If the President goes to the country where there is war - how come he doesn’t travel in the best possible airplane that has 4 engines and anti-rocket systems?

I see 4 explanations:

• either the war is fake and there is no risk (other than propaganda and fear porn), or:

• the president is fake (so there is no need to protest the actor that much), or:

• Kiev is fake, or:

• … both

If the President goes to the country where there is war - how come he doesn’t travel in the best possible airplane that has anti-rocket systems?

I see 3 explanations:

• either the war is fake and there is no risk (other than propaganda and fear porn), or:

• the president is fake (so there is no need to protest the actor that much), or:

• … both