Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society? How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the OT, or the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. When you take out all fhe dogma, they all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." More specifically they say things like, "You are the Divine Spark." "You are all Children of God." "You are a Split-Apart from Source." All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the Divine, of Source. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility of our own Divinity, our own Sourceness, the entire concept of "trust" and "hierarchy" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding in their hierarchical social control structures, which is why both the old and the new have this in common.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society? How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the OT, or the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. When you take out all fhe dogma, they all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." More specifically they say things like, "You are the Divine Spark." "You are all Children of God." "You are a Split-Apart from Source." All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the Divine, of Source. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" and "hierarchy" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding in their hierarchical social control structures, which is why both the old and the new have this in common.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society? How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the OT, or the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. When you take out all fhe dogma, they all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." More specifically they say things like, "You are the Divine Spark." "You are all Children of God." "You are a Split-Apart from Source." All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the Divine, of Source. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding in their hierarchical social control structures, which is why both the old and the new have this in common.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society? How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the OT, or the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. When you take out all fhe dogma, they all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." More specifically they say things like, "You are the Divine Spark." "You are all Children of God." "You are a Split-Apart from Source." All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding in their hierarchical social control structures, which is why both the old and the new have this in common.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society? How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. When you take out all fhe dogma, they all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." More specifically they say things like, "You are the Divine Spark." "You are all Children of God." "You are a Split-Apart from Source." All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding in their hierarchical social control structures, which is why both the old and the new have this in common.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. When you take out all fhe dogma, they all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." More specifically they say things like, "You are the Divine Spark." "You are all Children of God." "You are a Split-Apart from Source." All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding in their hierarchical social control structures, which is why both the old and the new have this in common.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. When you take out all fhe dogma, they all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." More specifically they say things like, "You are the Divine Spark." "You are all Children of God." "You are a Split-Apart from Source." All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding in their social control structures of hierarchical trust, which is why both the old and the new have this in common.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. When you take out all fhe dogma, they all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." More specifically they say things like, "You are the Divine Spark." "You are all Children of God." "You are a Split-Apart from Source." All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding in their social control structures of hierarchical trust.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. When you take out all fhe dogma, they all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." More specifically they say things like, "You are the Divine Spark." "You are all Children of God." "You are a Split-Apart from Source." All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) of the formal religions are right. They all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." The Inspirations say things like, You are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is no "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. They all say things like "God is Source," and "You are Source." The Inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say things like, You are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

Instead perhaps we should be looking at what both systems have in common. Ask the question, what are both systems hiding? Maybe the answer is simple. Maybe it's as simple as:

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is not "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. What if you are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one. Instead they all pine for "the good ole' days" of the old one.

What are both systems hiding?

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is not "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. What if you are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced their old one, that they already created and controlled, with the new one, rather than wishing to go back to the old one.

What are both systems hiding?

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is not "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. What if you are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced the old one they created and controlled with the new one, rather than wishing to go back to the old one.

What are both systems hiding?

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is not "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. What if you are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities to our present system in who really created it (not the inspirations, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced the old one they created and controlled with the new one, rather than wishing to go back to the old one.

What are both systems hiding?

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is not "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. What if you are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it has really done in the past to control society. How many notice all the similarities in who really created it (not the inspiration, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced the old one they created and controlled with the new one, rather than wishing to go back to the old one.

What are both systems hiding?

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is not "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. What if you are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that our current system (science, medicine, etc.) was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it really does to control society. How many notice all the similarities in who really created it (not the inspiration, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced the old one they created and controlled with the new one, rather than wishing to go back to the old one.

What are both systems hiding?

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is not "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. What if you are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that that are current system was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it really does to control society. How many notice all the similarities in who really created it (not the inspiration, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

"Trust in God" is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced the old one they created and controlled with the new one, rather than wishing to go back to the old one.

What are both systems hiding?

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is not "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. What if you are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

This is the hardest "trust" for most people to question. Even if we assume every tenet as absolute truth, it is almost impossible to get people to appreciate that The Church (and all its predecessors and later derivatives) created a hierarchical social control structure and ruled through it.

We are taught to trust in the "LORD your GOD" and too few ask who that really is. We are taught to gloss over the discrepancies, the demanded child sacrifices that are rife in the Bible, the "changing" God from OT to NT. No one asks if their "God" is really the God they think it is. And how could they? That would be heretical, which is the word that "Conspiracy Theorist" replaced in modern society.

Challenging such core beliefs and the associated trust that goes along with it is almost impossible, and in the case of religion, eternal salvation is tied to it. Questioning anything in that dogmatic system leads to H. E. double hockey sticks, so we train ourselves to not question at all.

The "God" of most people's religion sits at the top of a hierarchy. The priesthood (or Rabbi's, or Imam's, etc.) as interpreters of "God's Word" sit underneath. They become community leaders because they are trusted. In the religious hierarchy they sit closer to "the top," conveniently created by the tenets of the system. Even for those who don't go to church, but rather rely on their religious text, they still don't appreciate who really wrote "God's Word." They don't really look, because their holy books say that each word is divine. Questioning that "truth" is again, impossible and heretical, AKA a conspiracy theory.

We have seen that the PTB can create hierarchical systems of trust to control society. Is it possible that that are current system was not the only such system of their design? What does the evidence suggest? How many really look at how their particular religion was created and what it really does to control society. How many notice all the similarities in who really created it (not the inspiration, but the actual creators of the formal systems and "official" books)? How many notice all the similarities in the hierarchical system of trust and how it controls societies in the exact same way?

People decry the "religion of science," and say that science has replaced "God". To that I say "Exactly". Science is a religion, full of dogma and a hierarchical system of trust, exactly the same as the system it replaced, with just as much control. People want to go back to the "original" system, not appreciating that it was the exact same group of people who created and controlled that one, before replacing it with the new one. People should be asking why they replaced the old one they created and controlled with the new one, rather than wishing to go back to the old one.

What are both systems hiding?

God is Source.

Once you appreciate what that really means, the entire concept of a "separate" God and a hierarchy falls apart. Without a hierarchy we can't be ruled. There is not "PTB" without it.

What if what all the inspirations of the formal religions are right. What if you are the Divine Spark. You are all Children of God. You are a Split-Apart from Source. All science (quantum physics e.g.) and all the inspirations (Jesus, Buddha, etc.) say that on the most fundamental level, there is no distinction from you and Source. I think we live for a time in a state of self-actualization of the divine. There is a level of "separation" but only on a certain scope, not fundamentally. Our lives then, could be thought of as a moment of reflection for the Divine. If people appreciate this possibility, the entire concept of "trust" falls apart on a world wide level.

I think this is what all of these systems of trust are hiding.

1 year ago
1 score