I haven't watched a Hollywood movie in a long time, but I just watched Sicario (2013) and holy shit was it packed full of comms.
References included:
a blatant "17" reference
a big, dramatic Q center screen
A quip about Vaccines out of nowhere and not wanting to be in the dark about it.
Battle scenes in underground tunnels.
It's about the CIA and FBI teaming up so the CIA can work within American borders in their quest to “dramatically overreact” and "shake the trees and create chaos in an effort to get the man at the top." Many talks about "Order and chaos". Many talks about the idealistic, by the book, FBI agent wanting to whistle blow about the CIA's illegal activities and finally giving in to threat and manipulation and signing her soul away.
There's so much.
What motive does Trump have to lead us on about Q, then? If he doesn't have control over Q, he would have disavowed Q a long time ago. That's a major liability. Trump and his hardcore followers are now considered Q adjacent. So now Q could come out with pro-Nazi shit and make Trump look like a fool.
Rather Trump is constantly fanning the flames with his choice of rally music and retruthing Q content. There's a compilation where uses "17" way more than any normal human would. He's not stupid. He knows about the Q community and what we believe. Then there's Kash Patel and Dan Scavino....pushing our Q buttons left and fucking right. They're not stupid, either.
What's the motive for them? You want to make a case? First, we need a motive.
Well I've been studying Q since November 2017 and I've been studying the deep state much longer than that. I was a big Q skeptic for awhile, but the avalanche of Q proofs became undeniable and mathematically impossible.
Many people here on this forum are well versed on comms, Q proofs...etc. So when I post a possible Q comm, I don't need to spend 60,000 words prefacing it with Q proofs, Q history, comm structure...etc.
I tried to provide you with a source to catch you up, but you chose to maintain your ignorance on the subject (i.e wordpress bad). But please go on about logical fallacies.
Forums are not a perfect system for discerning and disseminating the truth, but what system is? Crowdsourcing is a pretty damn good system compared to most other systems where it's top down with government approved experts.
I think this forum has been right on the major core issues over time. In the short term, theories are throw around but are forgotten when there isn't much meat to them.
I think we're all very well aware of the arguments from the mainstream and the left. They are mainstream because everyone knows what they are. It's not a secret what CNN, NIH, Fauci, CDC, FDA and others think. It's screamed from the roof top 24/7. We're the ones being censored. It's the other side that doesn't care to research against their own confirmation bias. They just walk lockstep with the government narrative. That's not hard to do.
1.) I never said I'm against monetization. I said "many" blogs don't get funding from big pharma which is relevant if you want impartial information regarding vaccines. Notice how extremely specific I'm being here. I don't think the wordpress blog I linked too is being funded by "Big Conspiracy". So his opinion is probably his genuine take on the situation. That's the best we can ask for in life.
A lot of podcasts I listen to have commercials for men's hygiene and prepper companies. So you would think they would be biased towards doom and gloom. However, when you listen to Steve Turley, The Liberal Hivemind, X22 Report and many others, it's actually all 100% optimism. The only people I know who doom and gloom are people who listen to Fox News. Another notch for the indie podcasters vs mainstream.
2.) Political writers are not impartial, but again, the question is are they making their arguments in good faith. It doesn't mean they're right, but you brought up the idea that we can dismiss someone based on the mode of communication they use...or am I mistaken?
I think if you look closer, you'll find people are very skeptical on this forum. We are constantly calling each other out for "Datefagging". We are also constantly asking for the "sauce" because we may want to share something, but we need to verify it first. These are two examples I can't imagine you missed if you've been around for just a week.
We also have people in here with the sole purpose of sharing and agreeing with off the wall theories to make us look stupid and hope that maybe some of us will share them in our own circles and discredit us to the outside world.
I don't really care who says what on which platform. I just read and judge the content itself.
I think most people on the internet are trying to manipulate others. I think there's a small minority of people getting to the truth. You need to watch where people get their funding from, you need to see if their message is consistent and non-contradictory over a period of time....etc.
For example, the mainstream media gets a TON of funding from big pharma, so we need to be very skeptical of their messaging on vaccines. Meanwhile, many wordpress/independent blogs don't get any funding from big pharma so their analysis can be looked at as more impartial.
You should read up on comms and how they work. https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/
Agreed.
“The best political, social, and spiritual work we can do is to withdraw the projection of our shadow onto others.” - Carl Jung
On a personal level, I've dived deep into Christianity and Eastern religion since I was 12 (34 now) and, while I think there is a lot to gain there, it seems to be lacking something major that I believe Carl Jung nailed.
I'm now just diving deep into Carl Jung. Where as Eastern and Western religions focus on being like Jesus and looking to the light, Carl Jung asks us to turn to the shadow, dive into the shadow, integrate with the shadow. That, he says, is the path to not being "good", but being whole.
This is why religion has so many sexually repressed and frustrated members that act out in unholy ways. If they don't act it out, they project their inner demons onto the easiest target, homosexuals. The ego can't acknowledge it's unconscious demons (too painful) and so it uses projection as a go-around to avoid feeling said demons. Just fill yourself up with hatred and anger and you won't feel shit.
This is not to say that homosexuals aren't dealing with the same shit. Often homosexuals have a shockingly dark, dense shadow/unconscious self. They can project with the best of them. They are often dealing with severe childhood trauma from shitty parents, brutal romantic rejections to sexual abuse. I have a lot of homosexual friends here in New England and this is par for the course with them.
Many lesbian couples have deep resentment for their partners and I see them act it out accordingly while hanging out in their homes. They aren't really lesbians. Deep down they want a man and they want children. They take all their resentment for the romantic failures in their life and project it onto their partners. So you see them just blow up at each other for no reason and constantly talking to each other with contempt. They admit to living in a constant state of anxiety, depression and meaninglessness.
The lesbian relationship is just a political bond.
I didn't write him off. Read the second half of my post. I'm being pretty level headed about it.
Lin Wood is right that if they can fake a global virus epidemic, they can create a fake Q movement. I have no problem with that.
Heck, you can go look up Probably Alexandra. She goes one step further and breaks down exactly how Trump is simply the "white half" of the Freemason's Hegelian dialectic. Like Lin Wood, her videos are steeped in an exhaustive understanding of the Bible and Freemasonry. She makes a far stronger argument than what Lin Wood presents.
I tried reading through it. Lin Wood is basically accusing EVERYONE of being a subversive insider including:
X22Report, Robert Kennedy Jr., Mike Lindell (The list is massive)
Reason given? Guilt through association.
I need more than that.
Flynn could be a high level traitor, expert in creating large psyop networks. He certainly has the background and education to do just that.
Thanks to technology and forums like this, we don't need to rely on some figure to hand us down information. Everything is decentralized now. The cult of personality is over. Therefore, I don't think Flynn is a threat.
How is the definition wrong? I've been studying 9/11 since about 2004. When I say a 9/11 documentary is outdated, it just means better information came out. It doesn't mean 9/11 wasn't an inside job. There are major figures in the 9/11 truth movement that ARE pushing disinfo on purpose or by accident. There are many 9/11 theories and they all can't be true. There couldn't be planes and no planes at the same time, for example.
You are dense.
I think Dr. Judy Wood has the most accurate account for what happened on 9/11 as far as physics and engineering go. If anyone knows of any documentaries based on her stuff, that would be interesting. She does have presentations you can watch by searching her name on Youtube.
I've watched a lot of 9/11 documentaries but many are outdated now.
"high/low trust society" is a concept, and a line of research, that is popular when reading libertarian and anarcho-capitalist literature. I think it's very important to understand it.
You can't have low taxes or low crime without high trust. The idea is that if I don't trust you, then I'll vote for more government to keep you in line. So I'll be willing to pay more in taxes to have that government. Or....if I don't trust you, I'll steal from you before you have a chance to steal from me. Low trust > more crime > more government.
High trust also implies that we are similar people with similar values. So this "melting-pot" theory or the idea that "diversity is strength" is obviously bunk.
Kash definitely slipped in the truth of Q in that first video
"Whatever the movement is saying, matters to a lot of people, and you gotta take it seriously and move these people into the tent"
"We take the proceeds and drive it toward the mission"
"If you're not gonna have fun with it and can't get people to relate to it, you're not gonna have an effective...messaging....scheme."
"And I think, Donald Trump, better than anyone else, knows how to message"
Do the math. He's telling you right here Q is Trump.