1
Battlefield 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would question the 'We have shot abortionists and called it justifiable'. God's prophets in the Bible showed no mercy to Moloch worshippers who sacrificed children to their false god.

2
Battlefield 2 points ago +2 / -0

In the UK, less than 1 person per day is dying from the delta variant.

To put that into perspective, traffic accidents cause 5 deaths per day in the UK.

1
Battlefield 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not a scam website. Life Site News always source their stories with reports and data. Their article was sourced with data.

The key point from the article is that 700 women in the study were later than 28 weeks pregnant, and miscarriages after 28 weeks don't get classed as miscarriages, they get classed as stillbirths. Therefore from the data we can conclude that all of the miscarriage figures were in pregnant women under 28 weeks.

7
Battlefield 7 points ago +7 / -0

In the UK, less than one person per day has died from the delta variant (24.7 per month).

Five people per day die from traffic accidents in the UK, so traffic accidents cause 5 times as many deaths as the delta variant. The media Big Pharma puppets aren't whipping their sheep into a paranoid frenzy over traffic accidents though, because there isn't a vaccine for traffic accidents.

2
Battlefield 2 points ago +3 / -1

Millions of Europeans died because of Hitler.

If you don't care about Europeans, or if their deaths are acceptable to you, then you are not welcome here. Go spread your anti-European hate someplace else.

3
Battlefield 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exact quote from Hitler, "We are socialists. We are enemies of the capitalist economic system."

2
Battlefield 2 points ago +3 / -1

Millions of Europeans died because of Hitler. Their deaths were used by globalist puppets as an excuse for mass immigration into Europe to replace those killed in the war.

As with all socialists, Hitler was evil.

1
Battlefield 1 point ago +1 / -0

To put it another way, exposure to a virus increases your natural immunity against future viruses.

To give an example of this, 81% of the population already had cross immunity against the WuFlu from having had 1 of 4 other corona viruses. That was why on the infected cruise ship back at the beginning you had some people getting really ill while others got either no symptoms or barely the sniffles.

3
Battlefield 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean, OP's posted comment is true if nature is allowed to run its course, but you do add an important qualifier with regard to the vaccine, i.e. 'viruses become more contagious/less lethal' if nature is allowed to run its course without the introduction of an untested experimental non-sterilising vaccine.

Basically, mass vaccination while a virus is still widespread in society is idiotic (especially when the 'vaccine' is non-sterilising), because it puts increased pressure on the virus to mutate in a way which is deadly for the vaccinated. However, in a scenario without the vaccine, OP's posted comment is accurate.

When nature is allowed to run its course without man-made interference, viruses become more contagious/less deadly.

3
Battlefield 3 points ago +3 / -0

To expand upon your mutation point, in 18 months the most a virus could mutate is 0.3%.

2
Battlefield 2 points ago +2 / -0

The WuFlu vaccine has killed more people than all other vaccines combined in the last 20 years. You can verify that information for yourself on the VAERS website.

2
Battlefield 2 points ago +2 / -0

So far 6,000 people have died from the vaccine out of 150,000,000 who got it. That rates the chances of death at around 1 in 25,000. However, there are also over 100,000 adverse reactions to consider, putting the risk of an adverse reaction at around 1 in 1,000.

To say the vaccine is totally safe is a lie. To say everyone will die is also a lie (or at least, unproven speculation). We should occupy the objective middle ground. Anyone under 50 would have to be insane to get the vaccine. Anyone over 70 should only consider it very cautiously after doing thorough statistical research for their specific health circumstances.

4
Battlefield 4 points ago +4 / -0

There were two choices:

  • Permanent lockdowns, which would eventually lead to widespread famine and mass starvation. (millions of deaths)
  • Destroy their narrative with vaccines. (6,000 deaths)

This is a war. In a war their are no ideal solutions.

1
Battlefield 1 point ago +1 / -0

Permanent lockdowns lead to widespread famine and mass starvation. So far 6,000 have died from the not-vaccine. Even if the true figure is ten times that amount, 60,000 deaths is preferable to millions of deaths from starvation.

It is up to us to make the normie sheep aware of the risks and help wake them up.

1
Battlefield 1 point ago +1 / -0

Increased traffic helps their page rank, which increases the amount they can charge their advertisers. Not all adverts are PPC, some are PPM.

2
Battlefield 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's the Guardian. The Guardian are woke satanic establishment puppets.

OP should have linked to an archived link.

2
Battlefield 2 points ago +2 / -0

People have come to her to ask for her prayers. Her work makes her more aware of the problem.

It's similar to someone who works with depressed people knowing lots of people who have committed suicide. Those who work in a specific line of work are going to be more aware of the problem by nature of their line of work.

6
Battlefield 6 points ago +6 / -0

Many democrats are genuinely on the side of evil. Some have been tricked into thinking they're on the side of good, when actually they're on the side of evil.

We are on the side of good. We are not on the same side as evil. We can pray that those who have been fooled come to the side of good, but we are not on the same side as evil.

3
Battlefield 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think she's Deep State, but she clearly believes several evil policies. Most democrats are DS and do exactly what they are told, but some are independently evil and do what they want.

4
Battlefield 4 points ago +4 / -0

He didn't. He claimed vitamin B17 got rid of his wife's cancer. You need to go back and reread the post you replied to.

The linked articles claimed ivermectin is effective against cancer. Q has stated that there are cures for diseases which are being suppressed, so these claims, whilst not specifically confirmed by Q, are nevertheless in alignment with general statements made by Q. I would therefore suggest that you also go back and reread Q's posts before you post again.

1
Battlefield 1 point ago +1 / -0

You do not come together with evil.

YouTube evil a chance to repent and come to the side of good. If they reject that opportunity, they are the enemies of God and must be treated accordingly.

2
Battlefield 2 points ago +2 / -0

As a reminder, data from an official NHS report confirmed that vaccinated people are 6.4 times more at risk from the 'India variant' compared to unvaccinated people.

Unvaccinated = 0.1% death rate (less than the seasonal flu)
Vaccinated = 0.64% death rate

Those who got the vaccine were told it would protect them when it actually increased their chance of dying by 6.4 times.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›