Yes, Devin's original comment about that is actually on our assessment board and why we think Trump will acquire Netflix. It will be virtually impossible for a new streaming platform to gain any traction with giants like Netflix, Hulu, or HBO running around. One or more of these platforms have to collapse. Which is why we point at Disney and Netflix. They either completely fall apart or get eaten up by DWAC.
As for Hulu, Sling and Pluto, those are possiblites but we lean away from those because they aren't in the spotlight so to speak. Netflix's sudden about face on wokeism was a big indication that they might be taken over. Also the big Disney backfire with the "Don't say gay bill".
As for the news networks, there are so many that it's almost impossible to see what will happen to them all. One thing is for certain about the future of news. Independent journalists that we watch on YouTube and Rumble will be on those networks. Think Tim Pool, Steven Crowder, Patel Patriot, Salty Cracker, BCP, etc. Of course if they want the job.
Yes, but I'm not sure what happens when a company completely goes under. If there is anything of twitter left, then sure he may acquire it. A few of us have been guesstimating what the company will acquire and I think it will be the following:
- Disney
- Comcast
- NBCUniversal News Group
- Pfizer
- Moderna
- Johnson & Johnson
A few analysts and myself have been looking deep into these companies since 2020, and we have reason to believe these companies will be part of Trump's acquisition.
Too Long Didn't Read. This is basically why I don't watch Tucker or have much faith in DSouza. Both, in my opinion, are opportunists looking to gain fame from a tragedy that thousands of people are trying to actively reverse through grass roots efforts. These two get into a slap fight over who takes credit. Fuck em both.
You have Tucker that won't report on anything unless it is of benefit to him and his show. Then you have DSouza who has tons of information and evidence on this stolen election that he hides it behind a paywall. Its no different than getting into a car accident and a paralegal comes out of nowhere to hand you their card while you're still trying to climb out of the wreckage. Too many fucking vultures and not enough patriots.
I just watched it and I have to say it's a bit underwhelming and dramatic. If you've been following the election fraud, there isn't much new here aside from maybe a couple of minutes of surveillance footage. However, they claim to have several thousand hours of video of these mules. Which really should of been the focus of the film. One thing that did surprise me was that some of the traffickers were active participants in the BLM riots.
If I wasn't following this in any capacity, and someone showed me the film, I'd probably dismiss this film outright personally. My initial response would be "Okay, call the cops and show them the proof."
Anyone have any thoughts on the film? I just watched it and I have to say it's a bit underwhelming and dramatic. If you've been following the election fraud, there isn't much new here aside from maybe 60 seconds of surveillance footage. However, they claim to have several thousand hours of video of these mules.
If I wasn't following this in any capacity, and someone showed me the film, I'd probably dismiss this film outright personally. My initial response would be "Okay, call the cops and show them the proof."
I haven't seen it myself, and I don't plan to unless it is hosted somewhere online. I've always said I'm not a fan of something like this being sold to the public. It takes away credibility, and makes the whole thing look shady.
The fact of the matter is, there are thousands of people trying to make a buck off of people like us that want to find out what really happened in 2020. In my opinion, making a film was probably the dumbest thing Souza could of done. I'm not saying he can't be trusted but most of his information is behind a paywall and that just makes me raise an eyebrow.
I don't mean to piss off any fans of the guy, I'm just asking the question. Why make people pay a fee for this stuff?
I still fail to see how a movie would be any more convincing then actually presenting the evidence. In my opinion it takes away credibility.
"Hey I have proof of election fraud, but I'm going to make you pay for it by seeing it in a movie theater."
Just doesn't seem logical to me, but maybe I'm just missing something.
At this point it should be obvious. He's going to play it at the tail end of this conflict to end the conflict if no other strategies work. By definition, a trump card is something that gives a person or group of people a decisive winning advantage to the point the probability of losing is impossible.
Now I want to address timing a little bit. Trump cards have no value during the beginning of game because the opponent likely has several ways to counteract it. They gain value the longer the game is drawn out because the opponent won't have enough resources to stand agaisnt it. This is a universal law in any form of conflict or game.
Lastly, if the trump card hasn't been played yet, then it means the opponent has plenty of resources to match or counteract. Also, if Trump is already winning, he will keep the trump card hidden, possibly never revealing it.
I really don't like this roll out. Why all the theater, dramatics and ridiculous need to SELL the info?
"Hey guys we got proof of election fraud, but I'm gonna turn the video evidence into a movie and make people that are curious about it buy tickets to the film and score a nice profit."
Am I the only one that has a problem with this? I'm really sick of the ticket and T-Shirt sales. This really doesn't lend credibility to the case at all.
Correct.