Was Ukraine infected with idiocy by hosting too many us politicians offspring? Scary thought... But it should make Putin's job there easier.
Not that much on the books, a few million dollars. Not enough to accomplish anything really. So these are probably black budget items, totally legal stuff we promise
Are these guys at snopes overworked? That fact check was terrible! My favorite part was when they said that according to some random dude with a PhD it's impossible for humans to create a new virus in a lab. But really the whole thing was quite funny. I give it give stars
Maybe this is a reverse warrant canary. If it starts being updated daily that indicates it's comped..
Two words.. supply lines
Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's
Yes and I haven't seen any theory as to why suspended. Are there any archives?
Underrated comment!
It may be the case that they jabs screw up the immune system. That might make people more susceptible to HIV infection. But components of the jabs might trigger false positive HIV PCR tests if they code for something in common with HIV (as alleged in the BBC documentary at least for some vax design)
To me there seems to be decent indications that the jabs suppress they immune system temporarily and in some cases ongoing, perhaps related to the use of methyl pseudouridine to stabilize the mRNA.
Some new findings show this junk stays around in lymph nodes for at least 60 days
Read RFK's book, it has a few chapters on this. Pharma put a lot of effort into defining aids as a sequelae of an HIV infection but there's no real evidence to support that. There are people with AIDS without HIV and people with HIV who never develop aids.
Amyl nitrate Poppers do supposedly
Because yes you can get HIV but there is no evidence of causality to aids. However aids treatment drugs like azt sometimes cause AIDS by destroying your immune system. So a person could get HIV from a transfusion and would be fine except if they "treat" for aids they then "get" aids and die. Quite genius plan really, fauci's last rodeo.
Also possible that hiv insertions in vax mRNA derived protein cause false positives on HIV PCR tests, without really being an HIV infection in any real sense. An HIV antibody test would be more conclusive
It's not even clear the causality of HIV and aids. Duesenberg and others hypothesized that hiv was a relatively harmless virus that colonizes faulty immune systems and thus produces a correlation with AIDS. Same could be true of vaids that could be in turn caused by the methyl pseudouridine substituting for uridine in the mRNA formulations.
Makes going to the bank a lot more fun!
I heard if you inject covid vax into your ears it also solves the problem
Don't forget, when you get COVID anyway, and have a worse time than your unvaccinated friends, that's how you know it's working
Fidel Castro? Yes spinning in his grave at this cuck
The way of the road!
Strep is a bacterial infection so I'm not sure quercetin/zinc would be expected to help a lot. You would want an antibiotic.
No, it's still a problem per 100K. The rates calculate the fraction of cases discovered in each population, divided by the number of people in the population (population being vaxxed people vs not vaxed).
The claim is that vaxed people are more likely to get tested than unvaxed - that there is a bias in testing rate correlated to vax status.
If that is true, it would effectively reduce the reported cases in the unvaxed population vs the reported cases in the vaxed population, and therefore would bias the rate.
I have no idea whether the claim is true - and neither do they. I know that I didn't test myself for something that was a barely noticeable illness, even though it did occur to me it might be covid. Whereas covid crazies are reputed to test themselves repeatedly just hoping to get a positive.
A lot of testing is driven by blanket testing requirements, which could help reduce bias. Except that up until recently it was biased the OTHER way. For example, unvaxed school kids had to test weekly but vaxed didn't have to test at all. But now they're back to everyone testing weekly.
Bottom line, they have a point that the test rate biases the data. But I've never seen any credible analysis that quantifiably explains away the rate differential based on testing rates. It's always just a handwaving "muh testing bias" excuse.
There are dozens of us! Dozens!!
https://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/dozens_of_us_arrested_development.gif
The bias in testing could definitely skew the results. But it's funny how it only seems to skew them one way. Higher rate in unvaxxed? vax is working! Higher rate in vaxxed? must be something wrong with the data!
The data is way worse than what was quoted there anyway - vaxed people multiple times more likely to be infected with omicron:
Germany: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/german-omicron-data
it's everywhere where they have data that isn't shitty and corrupted like US data:
UK: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/vaccines-and-boosters-associated
Denmark: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/more-danish-vaccine-efficacy-data
Scotland: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/new-data-on-vaccine-efficacy-from
To be fair, I think I might have got omicron but never tested myself. It was barely noticeable and only lasted a day. And even then the tests don't work a lot of the time anyway.
On the other hand, most vaxtards test themselves anally on a daily basis, so the argument that there might be a bias is plausible.
Now I understand why the federal government seems more intent on securing the northern border than the southern one.
I was wondering whether they REALLY turned in all the guns.. good to hear
... anymore