3
Carry_Handle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you expecting a war in DC? It's going to be these NG troops vs... what group? Anything foreign doesn't make any sense whatsoever as only the United States itself has the ability to transfer enough troops across an ocean to fight a war with almost no notice.

2
Carry_Handle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cutting so many corners that you end up making virtually worthless garbage seems to be woven into the fabric of Chinese society. They make their own dams, military ships, military vehicles, buildings, etc in the absolute cheapest ways imaginable. (Have you ever seen counterfeit concrete that's really just garbage bags full of trash? That's a real thing in China.) Sure, they can sometimes make a decent product, but don't underestimate their ability to ruin things.

2
Carry_Handle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are there at least several thousand that were trained? That could be a problem. A few hundred token terrorists? That's just a nuisance.

3
Carry_Handle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Full auto is nice for very up-close engagements, like across the room distances, but it becomes a hindrance at even moderate distances. The work to modify a normally semi-automatic rifle into a select fire weapon is greater than the value gained by the firearm now being fully automatic.

3
Carry_Handle 3 points ago +3 / -0

and what I'm pointing out is that doesn't matter in the slightest. "Certified fraud" is an oxymoron. Something can't be legally certified if it breaks the law; them saying that Biden will be the next president is as factually incorrect as when they try to claim the election wasn't rigged. It doesn't matter what they say.

2
Carry_Handle 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they're there to arrest the deep state then you don't need super highly trained soldiers. I don't think the average bureaucrat is going to stand much of a chance against the average National Guard soldier.

1
Carry_Handle 1 point ago +1 / -0

1: He literally said "...peaceful transition uhh military power." The word "to" can be more lazily pronounced as "tuhh" which can then even more lazily be pronounced as just "uhh". As someone who has lived in the south my entire life, I've heard plenty of people lazily pronounce "to" as "uhh" in this manner.

2: The phrase "peaceful transition of power" is so commonly said that to add the word "military" to it would be very strange. Any notion of the power of the military being transferred from the previous president to the new one would be inherent in the commonly said phrase "peaceful transition of power"; if that's what he meant then surely he would have just said "peaceful transition of power" instead of "peaceful transition of military power."

Conclusion: Him saying "...peaceful transition uhh military power." could have been him saying "...peaceful transition to military power." and I think it make more sense for him to have said that than him saying "...peaceful transition of military power." over the most commonly used phrase of "...peaceful transition of power."

9
Carry_Handle 9 points ago +10 / -1

Not at all. He cannot legitimately and legally "get in". Rigging an election to "win" means you haven't won the election in the first place. Even if the federal government, MSM, and big tech LARP as if Biden is president that doesn't make him so. Legally speaking, Biden is a traitor and if he 'takes office' then the United States would be occupied by a domestic enemy.

24
Carry_Handle 24 points ago +25 / -1

If Biden gets in it's not game over. There's still the very real possibility of revolution. If We The People started a revolution then the government would stand absolutely no chance of winning.

6
Carry_Handle 6 points ago +6 / -0
  • "Either they're expecting a very legitimate attack either by china or iran/al qaida..."

I know this is going to bring up the "Chinese in Canada" thing, but how would those countries/groups get the soldiers here? They'd have to cross an ocean, either the Pacific or more likely the Atlantic, to get here. It's logistically impossible to get a fighting force to the United States without permission from the US itself. Other countries don't have enough of the proper ships to deploy an entire fighting force over a body of water; that's uniquely an ability of the United States with its' many, modern aircraft carriers.

2
Carry_Handle 2 points ago +2 / -0

1:He himself said he would have to check in.

2: You don't have to be military to know what an M4, M60, humvees, etc are; any firearms enthusiast would know.

3: Why would someone working for the deep state insinuate that the election was rigged?

2
Carry_Handle 2 points ago +2 / -0

By definition, an atheist is someone who hold the position that God does not exist.

4
Carry_Handle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Declassification of information to expect the rigged, deep state courts to do anything about the truth is lunacy, but declassification of information to shape public opinion can be very effective. You're right to suggest this newly declassified information is to shape public opinion to be receptive to the soon to come arrests of the deep state.

1
Carry_Handle 1 point ago +1 / -0

If he's truly a deep state double agent then he already ensured that he wont be able to walk out in public after having confirmed a rigged election.

3
Carry_Handle 3 points ago +3 / -0

If he's part of the deep state then he doesn't care about getting votes. Why would anyone in the deep state care about what we lowly voters think when the elections are rigged? The deep state appoints people to positions of power and the elections are just for show.

1
Carry_Handle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Triple agent, not double. If he's really a deep state shill but was only pretending to be on our side then he's a double agent. (really an agent of evil, but pretending to be an agent of good). If he's on our side after all and was only pretending to be deep sate then he's a triple agent (in this case, a good guy pretending to be a bad guy who was pretending to be a good guy).

1
Carry_Handle 1 point ago +1 / -0

It does kind of hurt them though. Over the past 10 years due to super low interest rates, corporations have been borrowing money to buy back their own stocks. These stock buy-backs, which used to be illegal as a form of fraud, is almost exclusively the reason why stock prices have risen over the past 10 years. Fewer stocks available for people to buy = lower supply = higher price. If the share prices crash, then that means all of these companies shares of their own company have crashed too. Where previously they could have sold these shares in their company for a higher price, now if they were to sell these shares it would fetch a much lower price. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if it came out that these companies were using these shares as leverage for loans; if this is the case then the stock prices plummeting might trigger a margin call for some of these loans.

1
Carry_Handle 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I didn't know any better, I'd say Trump is purposely poking the bear and is trying to get the DS to wrongfully impeach him.

2
Carry_Handle 2 points ago +2 / -0

The NSA isn't deep state though. It was taken over by the white-hats and has been instrumental for the plan. Once the NSA was taken over by the white hats, Snowden was used to try and discredit the agency.

8
Carry_Handle 8 points ago +8 / -0

Red4: Movement of MIL assets...to central locations under the guise of citizen riot control.

3
Carry_Handle 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just thought of this; what if the plan were enacted this Sunday the 17th? Imagine the satanists getting taken down on God's holy day which is also the 17th IE Q? That would be fairly legitimate.

2
Carry_Handle 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Pence both confirmed the rigged election and tried to use the 25th amendment to impeach Trump then clearly he was a double agent, but I can't see any logical reason why if Pence were truly deep state that he wouldn't also try to use the 25th amendment (incorrectly, but whatever) against Trump. Being a triple-agent is currently the only explanation that makes sense to me. having Llin Wood and other say he's a traitor could just be necessary deception.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›