1
CynthiaQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remember being convinced (at the time I heard this theory) that it was the brother, and the mother was covering for him.

3
CynthiaQ 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would probably try one of the covid-preventative protocol regimes.. FLCC, Zelenko, etc., if you're not already doing that.

1
CynthiaQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does it really matter? They borrow most of the money, anyway.

I just got my bill for January's bronze Obamacare that should be $1100+/month: 56 cents. The stamp to mail in the payment will cost me more. It's all smoke and mirrors.

by RIR1776
2
CynthiaQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Divorce with extreme prejudice".. Be realistic in this, as well, because pro-vacx judges have been awarding child custody to pro-vacxers. It could backfire.

1
CynthiaQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you can't survive 72 hours without eating, that sounds like a problem in and of itself.

I'm in a relatively rural area, but I'm pretty sure if I put out rabbit snares, I would catch zero rabbits in a month. (YMMV, is what I'm saying.)

2
CynthiaQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

There do exist Italian jews with Italian-sounding last names.

6
CynthiaQ 6 points ago +6 / -0

How is this possible? Who's picking up this astronomical cost??

2
CynthiaQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem here is imagining the PM would care.

1
CynthiaQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

It helps high blood pressure..!

1
CynthiaQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well... the Founding Fathers also hid behind trees and rocks instead of lining up out in the open like "gentlemen", so..

There have been lots of posters with links to legal resources, so I hope you dig those up and you don't try to go it alone.

by BQnita
1
CynthiaQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, but this is the wrong way to look at it.

The 10th amendment says, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

So either some individual state has the power to control a woman's fertility, OR "the people" retain the right to control their own fertility.

An analog to Thomas' argument would be: "since there is no explicit constitutional right allowing you to trim your toenails, the government can prohibit you from trimming your toenails".

Completely lost in this is the concept of any PRIVATE or individual realm whatsoever. Remember that the state-fertility-control battle began in the bedroom, over contraceptives, including condoms and diaphragms.

3
CynthiaQ 3 points ago +3 / -0

A retired policeman in the UK did exactly that: filed a police report, I don't know that it went anywhere. Will try to find a link for you if I can.

2
CynthiaQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

URgh, I know what you mean. Last time I gave blood (20+ years ago) the woman kept digging around with the needle, scraping tendons and such. I almost threw up.

I can't feel guilty anymore about not donating, since I lived in Europe for several years, and the current assumption is still that all Europe-dwellers harbor mad cow disease.

2
CynthiaQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Illuminati". Which reminds me, the gene-sequencing company whose products are used by all the players in the covid space is called "Illumina". https://www.illumina.com/science/technology/next-generation-sequencing.html

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›