1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh I wasn't implying Trump was doing anything here. I'm talking about antifa/storm shills. The entire reddit style of discussion boards is extremely susceptible to manipulation, and as you said, it's their main MO. I'd honestly want to recommend the site administration consider making at least a small adjustment to the way it works, but I doubt anyone would be in favor of it anyway.

6
Deadline 6 points ago +6 / -0

That seems unfortunate. I don't know if it's been considered, but does this mean that, for example, a dedicated group could arrange a silent subversion effort, using 20 or 40 accounts to upvote/downvote posts, without ever actually commenting at all? Meaning they could control post visibility and influence opinions without even risking the inconvenience of having their vote bots banned?

-2
Deadline -2 points ago +1 / -3

Because your idea of an honest and robust discussion is total condemnation of an entire race.

I'm won't bother to read past your first sentence because if you want to know what I meant to say then just read my previous comment again.

You may remember making this comment to another user that attempted to join in on your honest and robust discussion. I'm going to apply the same principle going forward, as I believe I'm familiar with this phase of the shilling process.

-7
Deadline -7 points ago +5 / -12

Because your entire series of posts was about black people.

https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRCCL5Y9/x/c/4Dx41sm3zWN

Talking about African countries. White people live there too. "And yet you can't name a single successful African nation or community, anywhere in the world that [...] isn't completely dependent on white dollars."

https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRCCL5Y9/x/c/4Dx41oB5orB

African American crime culture, "African hunting ranges"? "Blacks" looting and burning every city, despite the well known fact that whites were heavily involved? You have a single minded laser focus for where you place blame, and you disregarded any comment suggesting there might be any nuance to your sweeping claims.

You can fuck right off with your bullshit, shill. The fact that your most egregious posts have been deleted doesn't mean I don't remember, nor does it mean that you have enough restraint not to have ample enough evidence against your immediate arguments still sitting in your posting history.

-15
Deadline -15 points ago +3 / -18

Your arguments cumulatively amounted to the most extreme end of a racist rant. You even went so far as to say something along the lines of taking zoo animals out of cages and putting the real animals in, as I recall?

It's amazing your appeal worked, honestly. And now you're here literally campaigning in this thread. You look a lot like the spearhead of a shill campaign to me, but that is at least seemingly an unpopular opinion.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +8 / -6

You're the guy from earlier that made several posts amounting to a total condemnation of black people across the planet, yes?

I'm sure you'll find a way to get around the limitation.

8
Deadline 8 points ago +9 / -1

Replace the first 2 letters of the n word with Jo.

Actually didn't get it when I first saw it on TD. Eventually I bothered to ask myself why people were joking about hating casual runners. Thought it was some innocent meme.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because everyone just uses the substitute word. I've barely ever seen it, but I've seen the substitute plenty.

-4
Deadline -4 points ago +4 / -8

Most of them have taken to simply replacing the n word with the word for leisurely runners as a substitute. Always with the loopholes.

The votes on some of the discussions on certain matters kind of throw me off, but I imagine it can't be that hard to have a bunch of accounts setup solely for vote manipulation - without ever posting with them - just to create a certain perception...

Maybe. I suppose I hope that's what's going on anyway.

10
Deadline 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm not a lawyer, but the word United appears 88 times in the document in question, so it's not like they're avoiding saying United States at all.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

one does not preclude the other.

6
Deadline 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's not as if we're overflowing with reliable news sources. Assuming you're actually right and it'll be a news source owned by Trump, why would this be bad?

-1
Deadline -1 points ago +1 / -2

You're basically racist as fuck, and being upvoted en massé, repeatedly. Once again .win makes me wonder.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't he...trying to hide though?

But then, that location is conspicuous enough, I guess.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there a reason to believe mid April is significant? I'm fairly dead set against extending anymore without a concrete reason.

5
Deadline 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tentatively, March 4. If nothing happens by then, or it doesn't look like events have ramped up in a major and good way, that's probably it for me. Won't mean that I'll assume something happening is impossible, but I'll be done with watching and waiting. Because to me at least, it taking that long will mean the plan is either extremely slow in coming, or it's so secret that I'll never realize it's taken place anyway.

In both cases, continuing to observe would seem to be a waste of time. Admittedly my original cutoff date was the 20th, but in the days leading up to that I saw people on TD pointing out this .win to get past the dooming influx over there, and found signs worthy of an extension here.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it works the way it did on TheDonald (iirc), it's just a new account made by an old user.

...Which is a cover story for the Dominion cheating that actually goes on.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +3 / -1

How exactly do you account for time zones when using these time stamps for reference? Is there a specific timezone you're supposed to use? Genuine question.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +2 / -0

I initially thought it was supposed to be some indication of war related activity, weeks ago. Not sure anymore really.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +2 / -0

We don't live in a world where they can do more than that. I get the annoyance with what they're saying, as I've basically just stopped listening to them all myself. But the fact is that they don't have options. They have to talk about something - something their Global Tech overlords will allow them to talk about.

25
Deadline 25 points ago +26 / -1

In fairness, the guy just came right out and asked him if there was either a plan to unseat the Biden admin, or if it had already happened. If this were true, the fact that we don't know already is clearly intentional.

This means there was literally no other answer he could have given anyway. Firm denial was the only option. Evasion would be as good as an admission from him.

On a related note, that interview really should be stickied..

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›