What a confusing interview. There is no plan, military is not in control, but don't concede on your bets - "I'll leave it at that".
This interview seemed pretty conclusive initially, but these farther down comments make some good points. Guess I'm back to complete uncertainty in less than 5 minutes again.
(Sorry. It's Tucker C)
Interesting.
Oh good. I was going to find a quiet dead thread and make this list at the end of a comment chain to save for later, but this works much better.
Yeah I saw the link, tried to copy the post to see how it was done. But there's no way to upload media that I'm aware of. So I guess I'll just have to collect these links as I find them lol.
They...overlooked it? The Space Force being significant I can buy. That it was simply overlooked - an entire military branch created by Trump - this I find hard to believe. Maybe they can't be touched for one reason or another.
I guess the idea of a simple oversight might make more sense if I listen to the episode later.
This is actually pretty confusing if you think about it. They bring him on to discuss his Twitter ban, maybe his ban from certain stores, all of which is the result of him talking about election fraud and being censored for it. The moment he talks about exactly that, they try to silence him.
...so why even have him on in the first place if they're so adamant about the election? What else was he ever going to say? This just doesn't make any sort of sense to me. I am of course done with NewsMax and have been for weeks anyway, but this still seems confusing. As if the entire objective was to piss off a large number of their viewers and lose that audience.
Did this continue past this point or did they cut it off like the guy asked?
The problem is, he can't see what's wrong with the structure of the wall, the conditions of the city or the lands beyond the gate. He hasn't ventured enough away from the gates and is too afraid to let go of the status quo. It is this weakness and not actual malice that leaves people extremely disappointed.
See, this is the one thing I find difficult to believe. Given some of the things he has said in the past, places he's read and how much news he must consume to do what he does, I can't see that there's any way that he doesn't grasp the full scale of things. I think he's fully aware, and just chooses to state otherwise because the most important thing to him is staying firmly off Youtube's ban radar. So much so that he'll spend 20 minutes disavowing and ridiculing any sensible thing he says, just to be sure no one thinks he might agree.
Maybe I'm wrong, but that's the way he seems to me, and I'm not sure how to evaluate that behavior. What I do know is that it's annoying as hell listening to him do it numerous times in a single video, and that's what ultimately got me to unsubscribe from all his channels in the end.
I stopped listening to Tim Pool some time early last month. His tone changed completely after election night, and got progressively worse from there.
Besides, you can pretty much get most of what usefulness he was providing by looking at the title of the video and toning it down. Usually way down.
This could potentially explain it I suppose. Trump is in control and has been all along. There is no plan - only the show.
That's extremely optimistic though I must say. Could also be the FEMA bit.