2
Deadline 2 points ago +3 / -1

There's a tendency to ban left wing shills on this site, even if they're just asking questions. I approve of the policy myself.

6
Deadline 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump is trying to avoid a Civil War, so he has to sell the masses on a bad Biden presidency. I wouldn't be surprised if Biden was implementing his policies on Trump's orders. It's just too crazy. Biden is the red pill.

So he's going to do immense damage to the country to avoid Civil War? I get the point, but I'm not sure they'd do that. Some of these things can't be reversed without bringing about war anyway.

Small examples - seems I've read something about Biden reversing Trump's transgender military ban. That's not getting re-reversed, you'd just piss a ton of people off. Job losses Biden is causing? That's not a snap and reverse sort of thing either. That HR1 bill is a literal nuke.

Just saying, at some point the idea that it's a psyop for the left won't be plausible.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Getting harder and harder to believe he isn't doing this on purpose, at the very least.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Makes sense enough, thanks for the explanation.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

No?

When and where are you saying he did?

2
Deadline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is there some means of determining when a post is from Q himself and not an impersonator? Is this one real?

13
Deadline 13 points ago +13 / -0

As I've come to learn, people on the internet are shockingly bad at interpreting even the most obvious sarcasm. Very ineffective at mocking these days.

9
Deadline 9 points ago +9 / -0

More like a plot to use the military to legally take back the government from foreign and domestic adversaries that have stolen it through fraud, threats, bribes, and general subversion.

If I were a left wing shill I might see it your way though.

by Evspra
6
Deadline 6 points ago +6 / -0

That works for some. Others will use workarounds and continue registering new accounts forever.

3
Deadline 3 points ago +3 / -0

It sort of is, and the only partial remedy for this situation is for the NPCs to suffer as a clear and direct result of the leadership they support.

Unfortunately I do agree that letting that suffering go to the extent that it really needs to in order to sink in (i.e. a couple years under a fully realized communist dictatorship might do it) isn't really feasible if there's a plan, and as long as we have "freedom of the press", this cycle will repeat even in the best case scenario I imagine.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +2 / -0

...where are you getting this idea of them just selling off pieces of the country to the nearest buyer? I've never seen or heard of this.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are a fairly obvious left wing troll, so there really isn't anything else to understand.

7
Deadline 7 points ago +7 / -0

Ah, now I see the possible significance of the 7.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems to be the opposite of what you're saying, unless I'm missing something.

3
Deadline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gonna step out on a limb here and say he's probably not dead.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

That makes sense enough. In considering it myself, I was thinking that, as "HopiumPlease" sort of suggested, the operation is supposed to be foolproof to a certain extent, allowing for the uniparty and their allies to have been more or less aware of it the entire time, hence the 4 years they've spent trying to label Trump as a fascist dictator.

Could be preemptive efforts so that they can say they were right all along, and justify seeking intervention by the UN & others once Biden is removed and Trump is brought back? It'd be an easy narrative to sell after all they've done. Possibly they were just as convinced as anyone here that Trump did in fact have a plan, and that's the reason for the impeachment effort, along with Pelosi trying to stop the military from obeying Trump?

Could maybe go along with what you're saying. The plan to oust the uniparty is easy enough, but the public support needed for such an action to not completely destabilize the country may be more problematic. It's even possible that Biden fucking at least a few things up now is part of that effort (to get people to realize Biden is a mistake), but I see myself now theorizing the exact stretch in logic people have been joking about - Biden being President as part of the plan. Even so, it almost makes sense. The optics actually matter here.

Entirely guesswork though. Is there an "official" accepted reason by the long time Q researchers?

0
Deadline 0 points ago +1 / -1

What pleasure do you derive from this performance? That's another genuine question, to you specifically.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just out of curiosity, what is the understood reason that the people behind this operation would be deliberately leaking their plans for the last 4, 5 years or something like that now?

Genuine question - it's one of the things I don't really get about it all. Because if random people on the internet are following these breadcrumbs and can figure anything out, so can Q's enemies/targets, who can then make counter plans. It would be dangerous to assume the deep state/globalists/nwo/uniparty/china are idiots, so it seems like this entire process would be somewhat self destructive for Q.

7
Deadline 7 points ago +7 / -0

The thing bugging me is that Biden is already signing EOs and making deals. When/if these things take effect, I'm going to have a hard time believing he isn't effectively the President.

by DMEC
1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Coordinating downvotes isn't illegal...as far as I know. I wouldn't consider that necessarily an indication that someone's a shill. If they were calling for DDOS attacks or doxxing that'd be a different story.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice looking website, but yeah, unless Trump or his family/friends mention it, I'm going to assume it's democrats trying to hijack this before it gets going. Especially if the site is mentioned or directly linked anywhere mainstream, or doesn't get immediately banned on Twitter.

1
Deadline 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you didn't have such an absurdly high post score I'd think you were a shill trying to spread disinformation and mistrust with how much you keep repeating this claim.

2
Deadline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Believe they've said thedonald.one is no good anymore in that AMA thread, other two should be fine though.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›