VERY interdasting. Thank you for your time and effort in having researched. In truth, I've not bothered to look, but somewhere in the back of my mind I seem to recall from having read other anons' digs, that the last name, "Schiff" had been changed from something else -- another surname-- along the way. But maybe I'm thinking about the Rothschilds. Regardless, anymore I'm of the "if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, then it's a duck" camp. ; )
@BurnNewHistoryBooks
When I was in 10th grade, almost 50 years ago, I wrote a research paper about the bizarre relationship between Adolph Hitler and Eva Braun. Because it was such an usual topic, I had to use inter-library loan to get the books I wanted to use. In those days, it was a somewhat drawn out process to get your source materials. At any rate, the books took longer to get than had I just gone with the materials in the high school and/or local libraries. So my paper was late. But unlike many of my cohorts, I, at least, had actually read my sources, not merely paraphrased/summarized encyclopedia entries.
I wrote that paper on a manual typewriter, complete with Turabian citations and carefully executed erasures for my typos. In a word, it was flawless.
My history teacher accepted the late paper as though it were a personal favor in doing so. And of course, I could expect that I would get points off for lateness. Later, he kept me after class to question not the veracity of my claims, but rather, whether I had plagiarized. Apparently, it was so well-written that he was having difficulty believing a sophomore high school student had written it. Being somewhat, but not terribly, insulted, I told him that I'm a good writer, but that he would have no way of knowing that, given that he had not previously assigned any writing. I pointed out that thus far, his assessments had been mere multiple-choice quizzes which required only the memorization of information, such as the year in which Columbus had sailed the ocean blue, as opposed to assigning topics which required critical thinking skills, such as "refute or negate the claim, using textual evidence, as to whether Leif Erikson had actually been the first to discover the New World."
He stood there, mouth agape. And then dismissed me, without even giving me a pass for my next class, for which I was already late. In truth, figuring I was already late, I probably stopped in the bathroom to sneak a few drags of a cigarette prior to going to the next class, kek.
He returned my paper a few days later with no comments or corrections, just a big fat red A+ on the title page. That was it. And he never bothered me again, although he did begin to include short prompts on his quizzes which required written responses, usually adding up to 50% of that quiz grade, which I was easily able to bullshit my way through. For example: "Describe the life of an indentured servant during the American Colonial period." I mean all one has to do to effectively answer a question like that is to know the meaning of the phrase, "indentured servant." Still, he was trying.
But back to the Adolph Hitler/Eva Braun research paper: While I have long since lost or discarded it, and could not even begin to recall the titles of the sources I used, I can attest with certainty, ALL of my sources concurred:
Eva Braun was the niece of Adolph Hitler.
Surely, you, as someone who uses the moniker, "BurnNewHistoryBooks," would understand that.
o7
Why, shucks, thank you. I spent a lot of time those first few years following in real time, was actually present in the thread of Q’s original post Day 1 10/28/17 on /pol. Good times. After awhile tho it got to the point where I simply had to start sleeping again. So my memory’s fuzzy on some things, But those earlier posts seem to be coming full circle now, retrospectively. Future Proves Past, Indeed. 🐸
Wow. Methinks there is a lot to decode in that one post. The caps, the word choice, etc. But what stood out to me at first glance were the words, “Cease and Desist.” Wasn’t there a Q post something something “C before D”? IDK and I would imagine one can cease and desist at the same time, not necessarily one before the other. Still, ‘dasting to think about while phone faggin’.
Not always a fan of Peterson myself, but I agree 💯. THAT was a great analysis of not only Trump, but Vance, Musk, Ramaswany and Gabbard, whom he collectively likens to Superheroes, a veritable Dream Team of “XMen.” In a word: STELLAR. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Let us not forget for all intents and purposes Trump himself is a democrat of the JFK variety. Also wasn’t there discussion about the formation of a new party, the Unity Party? Something like that. Anyhow, we shall continue to enjoy the show.
He seemed nice