2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt they'd actually write it like that... then again the CDC quotes an NIH paper that states that 50% of the patients treated with Remdesivir for Ebola died to legitimize Remdesivir for Covid-19. In other words, they openly say that they are murdering Covid-19 ICU patients. So maybe they're transparent about their medical discrimination as well.

There have been rumors and unverified whistleblowing nurses that stated that they give Ivermectin to vaccinated but not unvaccinated. But who knows how accurate that is.

3
EUssr 3 points ago +3 / -0

Only if you're vaccinated with a bReaKtHroUgh InFecTIoN.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

i WaS jUsT FolLoWiNg orDeRs

Said every sociopathic fascist piece of shit ever when trying to cover their ass after the trials.

The fact they got away with it last time clearly proves that lenience is not appropriate.

Life in prison or capital punishment for anyone involved. No more of this "but it's too many people that participated" bullshit. There needs to be a crystal clear signal for any tyrants and any authority that plays along with tyrants in the future.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

That site does not exist, got a working link?

3
EUssr 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll be confronting a bunch of doctors, PhDs and professors with the fresh ammo from PV, the FDA, Australia going full fascist and killing an 80 year old protesting grandma, and this.

They keep trying to look the other way. But I've been going at it for over a year now as the evidence piled up. At some point they'll crack.

They've been going back and forth between pretending that they're informed and read something else and "even if, what can you do", so they seem about ripe.

Thanks again.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't give much of a crap about fake news, if people lack discernment and want to ruin their lives all power to them. Natural selection will run its course.

What is happening right now, however, is the media facilitating a genocide, a coup and destruction of constitution, country and basic human rights. Anyone involved in such a thing needs a rope or life in prison depending on severity of involvement.

And yes, we absolutely need to stop government from having power over anything other than maintaining basic law and order. If anyone wants to purchase a nonlethal drug (e.g. no public access to lethal toxins) to try a treatment that is fully in their right as a human being.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well aware. Not to mention them trying to ban supplements.

Regulators are cancer. Even when well intended, the power of coercion will always attract sociopaths and be levied against humanity.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nooo, you don't understand!

Trump's popularity is waning! The low attendance had nothing to do with 45 and everyone else warning of the glowie event!

1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because they're demented cultists that wouldn't recognize science if it were right in front of them.

Many of my peers are STEM PhDs, and they're pretty much braindead. Truly stunning.

4
EUssr 4 points ago +4 / -0

LARP, just like the McAfee one.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

but the simple fact is that VAERs is self reported and unverified

Nice Goebbels media talking point.

I understand you’re scared

No, I most certainly am not scared. Zero changes in life style. I understand that you are, you little shill.

but you’re grasping at straws because you want what you believe to true

No, I just see the data aligning in a certain direction regardless of where you look. If you don't like VAERS, which is reported by the doctors IF THEY get a report from the patient (which hence validates all the points I've raised), then look to other countries that paint a very similar picture while employing more rigorous data collection standards.

unfortunately you will never 100% and neither will I.

Is your vaccine kicking in or why the incoherence?

P.S. If you applied even 1% of the standards you try to (falsely) deploy here you'd be out in the streets demonstrating against these pseudo-vaccines.

1
EUssr 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn't matter who presents the data. Data is data.

And the matter of fact is that the data is an underestimation of negative effects in favor of the vaccines due to the way the data is collected.

his suggested death rate is inferred based on a perceived underreporting bias without any evidence to back it up

There are studies to back it up from before this pandemic. VAERS massively underestimates real cases. Even if you factor in the increased public awareness of it due to the current pandemic there is no way that it doesn't underestimate cases. Simply because a significant number of fools out there still believe the pseudo-vaccines to be "100% safe" and because there are people who are afraid of speaking about any side effects because they don't want to be labeled antivax by retards.

not for why the vaccine is dangerous (or else the side effect would’ve occurred after the first dose).

Other people have done that. Why a historically flawed at best and likely corrupt institution is not yet showing any of it is, for the time being, up to your imagination.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

If their fruits are good, they're not a threat.

Any further judgment is up to God.

Depending on the gravity of their transgressions the law may have to arrange the meeting ahead of schedule.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're wrong. They can make those decisions, but they choose to follow whatever they perceive as the most popular leader.

Bring forth better leaders, that lead by example and things will get better over time.

They are winning because we have few, if any, leaders in popular culture, media, politics, science, academia, and so on.

You can not desire what you do not know, especially in a world that constantly blasts you with "shut the fuck up and do as you're told".

1
EUssr 1 point ago +2 / -1

I believe I must end my 40-year friendship with Donna.

Not without a long, empathetic and well cited letter.

Here are two of the most recent and powerful redpills straight from the FDA:

There's also Israel proving invariably that the vaccinated are at best no better off and more likely than not worse off.

2
EUssr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ham with raspberry?

I better not regret trying that when the stores open or I'll be literally shaking!

16
EUssr 16 points ago +16 / -0

Couldn't be any other way after seeing all those mentally disturbed, gender confused, angry, hateful, suicidal degenerates.

8
EUssr 8 points ago +8 / -0

They showed vaccines killing more people than they save in the FDA presentation yesterday, as well as the fact that the vaccines cause the variants.

The tide is turning.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›