1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, most people have yet to admit that much, they think we "saved Europe" so, baby steps.

3
Ecl1pseGST 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, The Government^TM has been on the wrong side this whole time.

5
Ecl1pseGST 5 points ago +5 / -0

To note- we've been on the wrong side this whole time.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://youtu.be/QBeSNsyLuw8?si=vFvq3rqCA6tccCtH here's a video that dispels much of the exaggeration of nuclear Winter. I don't know a whole lot about this guy but he seems to know his stuff. Honestly I just don't care anymore. I'm far more concerned about having to fight a civil war if they steal the vote again. Or worse, living in a world where nobody was willing to fight that fight.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

That may be, but nothing in use today is remotely close to as powerful as even the 2/3 charge Tsar that was tested. The sarmat 2 carries 10 charges that are each 750KT (according to what we know) These are certainly devastating for a few hundred meters but no, there's no way it can take out all of France. What it could do, possibly, is take out 10 very strategic targets that would be devastating to France, but not wipe it from the Earth, nowhere near that.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most likely, yes, people in power like to keep up the "nuclear war would end the world" idea to keep the public afraid, and make threats like this seem that much more serious. I mean, you could say that nuclear war would end the world as we know it now, but not actually, literally, end the world. A Tsar Bomba at full 100MT load could take out DC and it's suburbs and bordering towns for like 50 miles, but the idea that 4 could take out the entire US is insane nonsense.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is risen indeed. Feel free to do your own research, but I can say my opinion has been formed by watching a nuclear engineer on YouTube who often posts about all the unfounded lies surrounding nuclear. Basically, the powers that be do not want nuclear because it would provide such cheap energy to us, and they prefer us poor. Chernobyl was terrible, so was 3 mile island and Fukushima, however, the things they taught us have made modern nuclear extremely, extremely, safe.

5
Ecl1pseGST 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thankfully, contrary to popular belief, there aren't even remotely enough nukes in existence to end the world. Nuclear Winter theory is complete bs. If the Ruskies nuked the libtard filled cities they would be doing us a favor. 48hrs indoors and then clean up the mess.

13
Ecl1pseGST 13 points ago +16 / -3

It infuriates me that the British gave up our Christian Holy Land to those Christ deniers. And that our churches have been subverted to teach the lie that these Canaanites and Khazarians are "God's chosen" which would be a lie even if they were real Hebrews. Under the New Covenant all those who follow Christ are God's people.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes a stock. It's traded around and it's value is totally speculative. The only acceptable replacement is backed currency.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +3 / -1

Crypto is nothing more than a stock. It isn't a real currency, it has no physical value, and nobody is entitled to accept it. Don't get distracted. Ending the Fed is priority number 1.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

The entirety of what we call the "Jewish race" traces back to the Pharisees. Boggles my mind that so many Christians have been convinced that these traitors somehow retain their Old Testament "chosenite" status.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's true, but, this name is such a same-ism that I don't see it being a big issue.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea so, this doesn't matter in the slightest. With the power of the Internet it will take all of a day to let everyone know what the new term is.

4
Ecl1pseGST 4 points ago +4 / -0

As someone his age I think the majority is strong enough to make that statement. Even when you see a group of us in a room with TVs, most of us have our phones out instead. Nobody I work with under 40 watches cable news. They might watch pieces of it on YouTube but they don't sit down after work and turn on the TV like our parents did. We hop on our PC or just watch something entertaining and maybe scroll our phone sometime before bed to check for interesting headlines, or posts here in my case.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

CIA. Not that hard to spell. And if they actually were out of power we wouldn't have had those false flag shootings. Who cares if they have a bot that scours the internet for their name? Let them be scared.

2
Ecl1pseGST 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uh you really think so? Nah, no, there are plenty enough of us who realize the fastest end to the war is to cut off the head of the snake. And if they hide outside our borders we would never let them back unless they came back in cuffs.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

As a percentage sold, what would your guess be? Are these K models? Laptops as a rule have cooling issues as it is so that would only exacerbate the issue. But just from what I've seen on the desktop side, only users using the Auto OC and/or Auto Voltage with manual ratios have seen any degradation. Nobody who set their own voltage in BIOS has any trouble, and nobody with a non-K or a K that is at stock settings, seems to have any trouble. At least, none have reported it and showed their cinebench scores before and after. Regardless, Intel makes products in the US and AMD sold out to Taiwan, so I'll stay Intel.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have seen and heard zero evidence of that. I have seen and heard of zero people who run manual voltage settings have issues. And also zero people running stock settings who have actually seen degradation. The only reports, with pictures of before and after scores, of degradation I have seen are users who used Auto OC, or manually set the ratios but used Auto Voltage. This info coming from large FB groups I'm in. Just everyday users not some YouTuber cherry picking things for clicks. This is being highly blown out of proportion. An update will fix it. Intel rarely makes these mistakes. Sure, they, are thirsty, whatever, V8s are thirsty, it's the American way to hotrod it to the limit.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been following it and am part of several FB groups and the overwhelming majority of folks answering surveys have had no issues, running manual voltage settings or stock speed. Those who used the "Auto OC" in XTU have seen degradation, I have only heard of some claimed failures and mostly "my cousin's uncle's brother said" stories. Not a single picture. Nowhere near as many as R9s that burnt up a few months ago. Which I saw a lot of, with pictures.

Nobody cared about Spectre because it was an irrelevant issue, totally hypothetical, that was never actually taken advantage of by any real hackers. IMHO it was a backdoor that someone accidentally let word of slip out.

1
Ecl1pseGST 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if they set it higher for benchmarks and then someone forgot to update the release models? Either way, just set voltage manually and you're fine.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›