It’s not because I’m lazy. It’s because there is no point in voting in fraudulent elections.
My support for Trump has been #1 specifically because of Q and the intel / play to drain the swamp.
I would vote Trump over DeSantis for this reason.
However, if no swamp draining is actually occurring, no voter fraud is being fixed, and all that's happening is Trump is just running in 2024, it makes me question if there is actually a plan at all. It's. been. years. If no action occurs between now and the 2024 election I will likely root for DeSantis, as I will consider all of this a bust by then.
This is a pretty well known thing
Someone should archive both of these links w archive.org —- not able to do it on my phone rn
Incase anyone else got confused like me,
The home page of their site shows the FTX sponsorship and then this link shows their studies
Wearing the blue shawl on the left side is a nice touch.
I'm assuming you don't know what jaded means?
Jesus fuck can we put a NSFL tag on this, I just watched a man get run over to death by a train what the hell. Others may be jaded to death but I am not, I really don't want to see shit like that.
Perhaps nothing has been done... strategically
Posted on 11:11 11/11
I'm sorry but how are we poised to win full control of congress? We barely grabbed the house, during the 2 worst years in recent American history, and during a mid-term election when incumbent party is typically complacent.
And no, I'm not dooming, I'm being realistic. Last night was embarrassing, it wasn't a red-wave, and it gives me a very grim outlook on 2024 if the fraud doesn't get fixed before then (and I never would have imagined after 2020 that it wouldnt get fixed before 2022, yet here we are).
(Edit: To be clear, it was a red wave, but it was met by an equally big [fake] blue wave)
My hunch as well, but there’s also so many commits to this repo over the years that there could be any number of exploits lurking in here. I only had time to look at a few dozen and this caught my eye but I don’t know enough about the library to know what is a real issue and what’s not.
LwIP has been defaulting to IPv6 since 2020, the bug I pointed to is an issue of the header size being wrong when IPv6 is used (not when it’s disabled), the proposed fix is calling a function to get a proper header size, that fix has not been implemented in LwIP at this time and therefore is an issue (and therefore potentially a vulnerability) in systems using LwIP from 2020 until now. I just am not sure if anything meaningful can be accomplished from such an issue.
Honestly tonight has felt more like a red ripple.
Electronic voting machines have active internet connections and IPs. Possibly using LwIP under the hood? OSS is rarely audited by those who use it, perhaps something was slipped in. Checking LwIP commits now to see if I can perhaps notice anything odd, just for curiosity's sake.
Edit: This is a lot to dig through for one man.
I did notice that back in 2019-2020 someone (Gao Qingshui) changed the protocol to use IPv6 by default. See commit here
Then I noticed on github a bug pointed out, this year, which is caused if system is using IPv6. See issue here
Have not figured out what may or may not be exploited due to said bug. I unfortunately know little about networking protocols, perhaps someone else on this forum can assist.
Edit: Found a few commits of people fixing "endless" loop bugs, see here.
This was posted 1 minute after west-coast polls closed. Let's see what happens in California
I swore off voting forever after 2020.
I only voted today because of the new Q post. If shenanigans happen again this time around I’m truly done.
“You have the tools you need” 🧐
It also seemed not like how Q talks to me (granted Q is likely a collection of people).
That aside, this sentence alone is also concerning: "White hats have secured many systems, but problems still remain" .... what?
Why does she use the word “inoculating”, the Covid shot is notoriously not an inoculation and is instead just experimental gene therapy.
Is this true?
Didn’t this happen last year?
This is excellent. Holy shit
DeSantis was labeled as swamp by arbitrary members of this forum. That doesn’t prove anything to me. Q hasn’t stated DeSantis is swamp. If DeSantis is a random conservative with no awareness or connection to Q does that automatically make him swamp? He could just be an independent conservative who wishes to run against Trump.