preddit is a piece of shit. But i have a few charged up accounts to use there if need be. I don't enjoy using that site, because to charge up my account i have to be overtly fake.... almost libtardish. It makes me feel icky.
But it's worth it to drop a few truth bombs at a later date like "Oh i am done, i'm now voting for trump, this was the final straw for me, this directly affects me, i cannot vote for her."
Yeah, seriously, to get 2mg per KG of paste is something like idk.. i didn't do the calculations on it.. but it's like 2+ full tubes at the absolute least.. i'd estimate about 3-4 tubes.
Gotta keep in mind that full syringe is for worms. and the doctor is saying 2.0mg/per KG for cancer.. it's just a lot to consider.
my question is more... say someone is 90KG.. how is someone going to take 180mg of ivermectin a day?
The pills i've found are 12mg. so someone 90KG has to take (180/12) 15 12mg a day. That's like 1 & 1/2 sheets of ivermectin pills.. (10 pills per sheet). It seems like a hell of a lot.
I use https://veracrypt.fr instead. It's a program that lets you encrypt files, and also allows you to have hidden partitions.
eg:
use veracrypt with password1 to open MyHoliday.jpg, and it mounts as a drive with:
pic1ofmeonbeach.jpg
pic2ofmeonbeach.jpg
etc..
or you can use veracrypt with password2 to open MyHoliday.jpg, and it mounts as a drive with:
top.secret.pic.of.Mike.Obama.Nude.Real.PROVEN.jpg
top.Secret.Pic.Of.Macrons.Husband.Nude-HES.A.MAN!.jpg
etc..
This way if the police are like "we think this is an encrypted folder" and you're forced to give out a password, you give out password1 and no one can see the files in the hidden partition. They can overwrite it though.. so make sure your secret stuff is backed up in another place too.
Good stuff thanks for unpacking the technical details.
For windows users, i believe you can download Python3 @ https://www.python.org/downloads/ and install..
But how to get bs4... that one is something i haven't done in windows, but this video might help: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcnc1fQ8c84
After that you should be able to save the script to a folder, and open up a command prompt to navigate to that folder and run
python3 'Fatality_GAW_User_Post&Comment_Scraper.py'
I have decided to stop taking vitamins unless i feel i need them.
Generally my thought is two-fold:
1: we don't know what they're putting in them.
2: we can get all the vitamins we need by eating meat and vegetables and fruits, things that God designed, and maybe men cut, but not what men processed to rip out the nutrients and package it up in a new form with in a crinkly package.
The Reich effect is a term used to describe the psychological phenomenon in which a person becomes more likely to agree with a particular statement or belief simply because it is repeated numerous times. This effect is named after the psychologist Wilhelm Reich, who studied the ways in which propaganda and persuasion techniques can influence people's attitudes and opinions.
When a person hears a statement multiple times, it can create a sense of familiarity and credibility, leading them to be more inclined to accept it as true. This effect can be exploited in propaganda and advertising to shape public opinion and behavior. The Reich effect highlights the powerful impact that repetition and reinforcement can have on shaping our beliefs and perceptions.
I have downloaded it and put it on catbox.moe here:
https://www.NSFWyoutube.com/watch?v=wkaX5n3pfZE
prefix NSFW before youtube
A New Pearl Harbor - aka 50 Questions They Can't Answer = 5 hours but really good.
I also recommend this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddz2mw2vaEg
I'll give you another basic example:
For instance, during a conversation a combative atheist may boldly assert "there is no God".
If you were already in the argument and that was aimed at you, or if you are someone looking to jump in, you can reply "do you have any evidence for your claim?"
Things could go many different ways after this.. they could respond... "do YOU have any evidence for YOUR claim?"
-
to which if you just jumped in you can say "i wasn't making any claims, but asking for you to provide evidence for this".
-
If you were in it already, you'll have to analyze what was said by both parties before continuing, but a possible avenue is "The Holy Bible is considered testimonial evidence, and people have tested and testified of its validity in every generation including ours. If you are excluding testimonial evidence which is part of the body of evidence available to humankind, that's nothing more than moving the goalposts on what defines evidence at best, or at worse appealing to ignorance and dismissing billions of people, or generalizing them to be worthless without any shred of evidence to support that."
They could also respond "I don't need to prove my claim" - to which you can say, 'those making the claim have the burden, for example i have a bucket, saying 'there is no water in this bucket - how would i prove it to you? simply by showing you there is no water in the bucket'. This puts them in a tough position because in order to prove their claim of "there is no God" they would need to be able to prove that they can be everywhere in all of creation and beyond at every moment (something they can't do).
these are just a simple examples. But i will tell you i have seen this, and you need to be aware of it:
Combative atheist sets up fallacy... people engage with the fallacy.. the atheist then controls the argument and piles more fallacies on (bad path).
Combative atheist sets up fallacy.. you point out the fallacy and rebut it soundly. They don't like it, so bring out a fallacy to prop up their failed fallacy. You rebut that second fallacy. They bring out a Nth fallacy to prop up their failed fallacy that failed to prop up their previous fallacy.. continue to rebut the fallacy. I stopped after 3, saying something like "Fallacy 3, you're out!" and moved on, much to their displeasure, but i gave them kind words to learn the scriptures better so they can learn not to require the crutch of fallacies. This requires you to know, and be able to identify fallacies (it's not easy).. it's kind of like regex.. sometimes you have to look it up.
tl;dr: Stay logical, stay truthful, stay reasonable, stay rational, don't get emotional, stay within WWJD (imagine him dealing with the pharisees and sadusees, or the money exchangers, but also imagine how he was when peter cut off a soldier's ear, or helping the poor - bold as a lion, gentle as a dove)
I was just saying.. i thought it was a weird insult for someone i beat senseless with words to use.. it amused me that they thought i even listened to or followed the guy. I never saw him as someone to listen to or look up to at all.
Anon, i believe you were engaging with atheists in the wrong way.
While not every atheist requires this (eg: atheists who are live-and-let-live, atheists who keep their beliefs private), there are some outspoken and combative atheists who I've engaged and defeated them completely and identified the patterns they use (they never go outside of them). It's very simple.
First: you need to understand that atheism has zero (0) arguments that haven't been defeated resoundingly already. Their best argument, "the problem of evil", stems from ignorance and unwillingness to learn the scripture they're arguing against (plus when they use "God", that means the whole scripture can now be used against their reasoning, and it's a matter of you of simply having a well-versed biblical faith).
Secondly: every whine = ignore. every complaint = mostly ignore. Every assertion = ask them to provide evidence for their claim. A lot of combative atheist try to control the argument, and you don't let them do this by quickly and immediately pointing out their fallacies and red herrings (otherwise you're going to be dragging yourself through their mud - don't go there. know your line and don't cross it). Additionally, with combative ones, to save time never let a question you ask go unanswered. Ignore everything they reply with (which will likely be more questions or more assertions) and just say "since you're not interested in answering questions, but more interested in talking at people there's no point continuing"
Thirdly: i can see by your unstructured and rambling post that your throwing out a lot of loose ends that can let people jump on to attack you. It's stupid. You need to keep your words tight, and provide no loose end you can't cover, and they will try latch on to that, but there will be no gaps for them to get in.
I fought successfully and victoriously in the 2005-2015 new-atheism battles. I will admit i was a bit rambling in 2005, with the sword (the word of God) cutting both me and them. But by 2010 i was cutting them more than me. by 2015 it was only them getting cut. It was a 10 year battle that massively leaped me to levels of faith i had never known to exist before. And where i stand now i can say there are still yet higher levels to attain and especially: unless you're looking to grow your faith and live as Christ asked, engaging with atheists that way is likely to end up doing more damage than good.
removal: dupe.. we have one here: https://greatawakening.win/p/1994fVsBE6/looks-like-the-plan-is-coming-to/c/
transfer declined.