Section 1a "Not later than 45 days" and Section 1b "Within 45 days". while I'm not an attorney, I'd put myself up against some. my business requires i know law. the exact wording is important and this wording would allow for the EO to have been initiated within 2 days of the "conclusion of a United States election"...whenever the fuk that was. i read somewhere recently that they were still counting votes in NY
either way, anyone that thinks 90 days needed to have passed between November 3 and initiation of the EO I believe are mistaken
not sure but seems it could be significant with jfk jr connection and all, and perhaps the news outlet trump has speculated about getting involved in. at a minimum it appears to be showing us pictures never before seen and that this person or persons had very close contact and access with trump. some video and photofags should try to find proof of who is likely the person taking these images using available press photos and such from other angles
I didn't read all of your message or others but it appears that DC is an independent state/territory just like the Vatican. there appears to be legit claims and evidence that DC is run by a corporation called the UNITED STATES and that the Fed is not backed by gold but instead by us american patriots as slaves essentially where we were signed over unwittingly and unconstitutionally as their property when we got our birth certificates. our names are in all CAPS because that is the name of our corporate name is how I've heard many explain it. strange sounding I know but do your own research and see what you think.
here are a couple of links to get you started:
https://beachbroadcast.com/articles/f/the-2nd-declaration-of-independence---power-back-to-the-people
...and actually starts around 15:20 actually with Alex first mentioning. not sure what I think of Alex, but I do agree 2nd declaration is the way to go and anyone that wants to stay behind and be part of the corporate UNITED STATES can feel free to live in that hell
here's a 2nd declaration of independence that's out there and seems plausible as what might be coming or similar to what we might expect
https://beachbroadcast.com/articles/f/the-2nd-declaration-of-independence---power-back-to-the-people
i haven't seen anything to suggest that it couldn't be
seems very legit that vatican bought us circa 1871 after we were broke from civil war. this investment appears to have been protected by an unconstitutional agreement to make we the people slaves of a corporation essentially beholden to this usurper of our constitutional rights. its existed since and included in early 1900s creation of the fed which just further usurped and enslaved us.
I'm open to hearing an argument to the contrary but seems legit
if you ask me, same as what happened in 1776.... declaration of independence. freedom.
whats this link? a 2nd declaration of independence
https://beachbroadcast.com/articles/f/the-2nd-declaration-of-independence---power-back-to-the-people
right, and what happened in 1776?.... declaration of independence. freedom.
whats this link? a 2nd declaration of independence
https://beachbroadcast.com/articles/f/the-2nd-declaration-of-independence---power-back-to-the-people
right, and what happened in 1776?.... declaration of independence. freedom.
whats this link? a 2nd declaration of independence
https://beachbroadcast.com/articles/f/the-2nd-declaration-of-independence---power-back-to-the-people
the link which i admittedly only listened to first 5 or 10 minutes, only appears to address how to handle the scenario where an unconstitutional corporation was created and used to usurp we the people. there's a "2nd Declaration of Independence" floating around there somewhere that seems legally appropriate. It would provide proper legal notice to the corporation that we the people never willingly consented to the usurpation via takeover by a corporation and thus immediately demand all of our land and rights as citizens of the united states of America. What argument would one have that this isn't a logical and appropriate response to the usurpation whether it actually happened in the 19th century or 20th?
And what harm does this theory and hope cause to this Q movement and community. If we can legally reassert our independence and get our freedoms back, what's not glorious about this outcome. The version i just read suggests that the corporate officers that essentially acted treasonously would have option to keep their heads if they willingly assent to the declaration. While I hold no love for a traitor, it would seem a trade most would be willing to make for true freedom! These traitorous ones would never be able to show themselves again either in most locales and might be driven to their own death whether by having depressing and soulless days on earth or by taking their own lives.
I see a 2nd Declaration of Independence as a real likely outcome designed by Q and/or Trump and/or those Patriots working with Trump.
Tell me why this isn't great hopium?
if EO activated and the foreign interference is the CORP called UNITED STATES then it very well could be that military is in control with Trump still the acting commander in chief, although i wonder if for the sake of the normies if Trump won't distance himself and act as a bystander with Pompeo acting as president. Biden, Kameltoe and Nanxi are all foreign agents installed by the CORP
if you're not familiar with idea that we were usurped by a CORP circa 1871 I suggest you do your homework