3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

The last time that happened the rightful winner was reinstated within 72 hours.

https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/bs-xpm-1994-02-20-1994051024-story.html

Also, notice the allegations and what they were able to prove. They're using the same tactics they used in 1994...unbelievable.

8
Insignificant 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm thinking of that "joke" Trump told to Hillary at the Al Smith Charity Dinner back in 2016. He said something about running into her in the hallway and all she had to say was, "pardon me." It's a great video if you haven't seen it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bmvxx_YbDsM

11
Insignificant 11 points ago +11 / -0

Or maybe he sees a firing squad that uses weapons from Operation Fast and Furious.

3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

These kids will one day tell their kids and grandkids about the time they spent 2 years under a communist regime.

3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

Q actually posted this years ago. It's hard to find anything about it though, aside from this.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you're implying that Joffe didn't work at Georgia Tech, you are partially correct.

"Joffe “tasked” Lorenzen and “two computer researchers” — Antonakakis and Dagon, who worked at Georgia Tech — “to search broadly through Internet data for any information about Trump's potential ties to Russia,” the indictment said."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/identity-of-tech-executive-in-durham-indictment-revealed

3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also the 91st Associate Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court. I like the Mueller theory.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

I admit, I am somewhat of a spelling Nazi. I just can't help myself.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

John Durman huh? Let's at least get the man's name right. After all, he is exposing the most significant conspiracy we've seen in 60 years.

8
Insignificant 8 points ago +8 / -0

I love the clip of Don Lemon making fun of Trump's test, then Lemon goes on to get one of the first questions wrong since he didn't know the difference between a rhinoceros and a hippopotamus. Trump answered correctly at least.

8
Insignificant 8 points ago +8 / -0

Now look at Charles Lieber and why he was arrested. He was not only stealing nanotech research and giving it to China, but also developed patents relating to the injection of nanotech using vaccines. This is no coincidence.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

The last sentence is telling. They will ask for you vax status so they can better implement "safety protocols...related to masking, physical distancing, testing, travel, and quarantine." So they've essentially admitted to discrimination based on your vax status. I was recently offered a position on the base near where I live, but masking is still a requirement. We must hold the line as they say, but they are also trying to hold theirs.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's no doubt that the devastation caused by a comet impact could provide the conditions that would allow viruses to thrive, but come on man. Like they find ways to tell us that everything is tied to racism, now they've shifted to say everything is due to covid.

5
Insignificant 5 points ago +5 / -0

I still think the first arrest and first indictment was Charles Lieber. His crimes tie to everything; the virus, patents, DNA manipulation, nanotech, Gates, Fauci, and all the rest. He's actual proof of collusion with China using the most treasonous methods. Like Q said about signaling future direction, where does this lead?

4
Insignificant 4 points ago +4 / -0

They'll just say that since it's "just a tiny fragment" of HIV, it's harmless...the same way they claim that mercury in vaccines is harmless since it's such a small amount. This is insane.

5
Insignificant 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is happening fast. I just read 10 minutes ago about New York dropping their mandate as well. Can we get to 50 states before Monday? Biden might be forced to announce that federal mandates are done during his state of the union speech March 1st.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was written over the course of a decade or more, but wasn't first published until 1981, 4 years after Quigley's death.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

He wrote many different things and yes, Bill Clinton thanked him publicly several times for his insight on global affairs. I don't know that he supported a one-world government more than he exposed the plans for one. This quote is from a book called "The Anglo-American Establishment: From Rhodes to Cliveden" where he breaks down how a one-world government is the goal of people he's studied his entire life. It seemed to me that he was shining the light on the big game, not exactly playing it himself.

1
Insignificant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Be careful. This could be considered misinformation or possibly hate speech depending on your political climate.

2
Insignificant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks. I get called a Nazi and racist, etc. quite often for pointing out some inconvenient truths. I'm just fascinated with history and trying to make sense of the historical narratives we've all learned. The more you know, right?

3
Insignificant 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's great when people take the time to look a little deeper with such important historical events. I remember those quotes from Lincoln as well. Newspapers from all over were writing about how Lincoln was only playing his "last card" in order to secure reelection and hopefully more workers for his factories and housekeeping. After all, the Emancipation Proclamation didn't free slaves in the northern or border states. And they wonder why the Underground Railroad ended in Canada.

But it was his tax policy that really got things moving. There were many meetings to try and convince Lincoln not to attack Fort Sumter, but he insisted due to the possibility of him losing the tax profits that came from there. Here's one of my favorite quotes from Lincoln, after being asked to leave Fort Sumter alone:

"If I do that, what would become of my revenue? I might as well shut up housekeeping at once!"

Preserving the Union, or preserving the wealth?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›