You might want to post your entire intake, exposures, and daily routine for review. e.g. I saw you're drinking OJ, but e.g. is it good OJ or an "orange drink" is an important distinction.
Maybe try making a big shift and see if it isolates a factor we're missing. For example, set up at a friend's house for a week. Have them cook for you. Drink their water. Use their natural space. See if you notice any differences.
Quercetin is the only thing I'd consider adding to your mix.
On the one hand this news is huge because a nation is publicly acknowledging it, but yes on the other hand it's like: tell me something I don't know. 🤣
I think this moves the conversation forward in a huge way for normies though, as for them the truth has more to do with alignment to power and if they feel the power structure shifting it forces reevaluation of their reality.
If this was our first go around w/POTUS I'd be freaking out but he's like some 40 year old professional baller who keeps fooling rookies w/a loopy, flat-footed hook shot.
He does this REPEATEDLY and I can forgive the young 'uns for freaking out but a lot of the vets should really know better by now. 🤣🤣🤣
Silver has been underperforming for my entire adult life.
I allocate a bit to it but it's never delivered a windfall for me, and I don't really expect it to until the day the commodities exchanges get wound down for some reason.
Not much movement on Poly market.
https://polymarket.com/event/james-comey-indicted-before-october
We really must be talking past each other here fren. You acknowledge that it's an old c-span stream from JULY but you think it makes sense to categorize it as a "live" stream that Obama is about to be taken down? Make it make sense for me.
OP you are linking to a scam live stream from paytriots.
Here is the original, it's from July.
https://www.c-span.org/program/white-house-event/white-house-daily-briefing/662932
Cultish--or maybe a just a wording mistake as it reads better inverted--but can't deny that job market is completely re-calibrating right now. Lots of folks who thought they had something carved out are losing it (software, education, law, movies, medical). Nice to see tradesmen getting a boost though.
Also think that the concept of educated, Rockefeller job begins to go away. There isn't a need for grinding 40+ hours a week, and many industries were parasitic or meddlesome at best (DEI/HR/insurance/finance).
I see seasonal work & quarterly shifts becoming a big thing. Harvest season was a boom time in my hometown. Folks worked hard, got big paychecks, and could relax a bit afterwards. Hard work yielded savings and prosperity.
My hope is the economy of the future centers on a husband supporting a full family on six months of work a year, with savings to spare. Hard work transforms from drudgery to something that is appreciated and rewarded proportionally. Fake jobs disappear and are laughed at as a silly ruse our forefathers fell for.
Followup post by Dan:
https://x.com/DanScavino/status/1968880713689653319
Didn't come up with any proof but seems worth having an eye on.
Things I noticed that might be fun digging on, and some of which conflicted with my earlier understanding of events:
-
Seems Epstein made a phone call around 7:49 pm Aug 9, 2019.
-
He had been removed from suicide watch protocol at behest of his lawyers. Didn't yet have a cellmate.
-
Michael Baden disagreed with the coroner examination results. Baden has been involved in about any shady death you can name off the top of your head.
-
Staff apparently don't do the 30 minute checks they're supposed to.
-
"You also described it as a 'perfect storm of screwups'..."
-
It states Epstein attempted suicide July 23, 2019.
-
Looks like a female was the recipient of the call earlier and they have it but the details don't seem to emerge here. Not Ghislaine.
-
Barr's dad was headmaster of the Dalton School in New York. Barr says not important.
-
Says Epstein-related investigations continued through his tenure. "And I didn't think this group of prosecutors would stop until they were satisfied that they had8 gone through the evidence."
-
"You said you felt like you had a good legal standing to bring the 2019 case against Epstein and then the 2020 case against Maxwell. But the current argument is that the Southern District of Florida can bind the Southern District of New York."
-
Barr's chief of staff's name is Brian Rabbitt.
Made it through a good chunk of it but not all.
<chomsky>I'm sure you meant to say "a made up noun phrase".</chomsky>
"Hate crime" is on the books in Texas. Didn't bother checking other states.
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/GV/htm/GV.411.htm#411.046
"Hate speech" is an in-progress operation/concept in the US, but it's on the books with the euros:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022R2065
And yeah I am aware this is being used to shoe-horn in restrictions on speech, but IMO that makes it all the more important to be frosty about what is actually being stated.
Pam is clearly making an offensive maneuver in our favor here (correctly classifying ANTIFA's activities as "hate speech" that rises to the level of a violent threat), and at the same time turning the "hate speech" terminology against the cabal and making them defend it.
The opportunity for the strategy you are pursuing--denying the existence of the term--has passed. This is a superior strategy: using the term against our opposition when they have little means to protect themselves from it.
That's not how English works.
"speech" = noun
"hate speech" = noun phrase, modified by the adjective hate.
"hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence" = complex noun phrase that even further limits the referenced noun
By your reasoning, anyone who uses a complex noun phrase has stated only the most emotionally triggering part of said phrase.
That would reduce our language to a ping-ponging of emotional keywords.
Oh...I see...
EDIT:
And I'll grant that over the pond this discussion gets different and they are trying to steer us that way so I am sympathetic to why folks are upset. It just pisses me off that she clearly scoped her language and all of a sudden there are 100s of accounts claiming she spoke generally.
Read carefully:
https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/1967913066554630181
"Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence" is a specific, illegal subset of "Hate speech".
Here is the original document:
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/reports-statements/mts/mts0925.pdf
And future statements are published here:
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/reports-statements/mts/current.html
If you look at the historical statements it's wild how often we do have surpluses though. So this is not as unusual as I expected...
https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/reports-statements/mts/mts.pdf
I would guess customs/duties is the tariffs as last I had dug into them they were bringing in ~$30 billion a month (with wildly varying theories as to where that # would ultimately land).