0
MichelesLeftNut 0 points ago +1 / -1

Exercise. Limit your caffeine. Find ways to work with your brain instead of against it.

by JC77
1
MichelesLeftNut 1 point ago +2 / -1

ITS AT 5000

20
MichelesLeftNut 20 points ago +21 / -1

"Are you ready to take the next step in the promising field of domestic terrorism? Operators are standing by ready to take your parents credit card.."

0
MichelesLeftNut 0 points ago +1 / -1

Dude the back with the white tee. Guess it WAS whitey after all.

4
MichelesLeftNut 4 points ago +5 / -1

I've had that same thought lately.

10
MichelesLeftNut 10 points ago +11 / -1

Editor as USA today earned it. As dumb games win dumb prizes. Enjoy that high horse.

9
MichelesLeftNut 9 points ago +10 / -1

Right?

PSA: things include dates. Dates are often relevant. If you've just found something from 5 years ago, awesome, share it if it's relevant- but don't label it as breaking news. This is supposed to be a place dedicated to serious discernment. I dont know if it's just shills but we seem to be completely incapable of telling when something is "recent". As if the 3 seconds checking the date found at the top of the article is just to much to think about before coming in for those sweet imaginary internet points. I dont get it. Unless it's a purposeful shill tactic [share posts and get up numbers in an attempt to "blend" when shooting your doom load later]

Maybe requiring a date in titles with a link could be a course of action. It would cut down drastically on confusion, misinformation, etc as we go into the portion where we're looking for the most clarity.

0
MichelesLeftNut 0 points ago +1 / -1

So where did you get the screenshot?

0
MichelesLeftNut 0 points ago +1 / -1

How about you provide it since all you provided are 2 old ass links. Burden of proof lays on the person making the claim.

1
MichelesLeftNut 1 point ago +2 / -1

"64 dead bodies found last week" Yet the article is from 2020....

Get your shit together.

0
MichelesLeftNut 0 points ago +1 / -1

Military choke point is my thought process. Maybe the kick off to the "live action"?

2
MichelesLeftNut 2 points ago +3 / -1

I think that's part of the idea with unloading. The offcial story being that were unloading for better buoyancy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›