1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Morgan Freeman has looked 70 since he was 35.

1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

It ain't a blood balloon was my point. Hard to tell if there was spray or not from video, tbh.

1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Barely kicks at all? Doub.

Here's me with a full size steel frame 1911

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuucO7nwt7w

.45 recoils. Nothing not controllable but it recoils. You're probably an experienced shooter and worried about re-acquiring sight picture/doing target focused shooting more than watching the gun recoil so you dont notice it as much,

4
MiyamotoHolliday 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thats not how rapid, sudden penetrating trauma works. Theres a half second before the bleeding starts.

Source: Was in Iraq.

by Evspra
1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you for your cervix!

1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +5 / -4

Who the fuck raised you? They failed.

1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't have to to violate that particular Texas Code. Also, later in that code... being real smelly is enough for a citation.

1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

calling a PA at concentra a cunt for not administerin

"Cunt" is known, in north America, to be a disturbing word. Motherfucker isnt. It's weird.

1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saw a video recently of a woman talking about that in her memoir. She walked in and fooled HW to his face. That's 30 years ago...

by gamepwn
1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're not relying on the shield. Break that wall, you"ll find out how fast these dudes can draw, aim, fire real quick.

This ain't the middle ages.

by gamepwn
4
MiyamotoHolliday 4 points ago +4 / -0

Outliers dont get to define the trend

1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Recruiters arent recruiting trannies yet despite the EO. Buddy is a station commander.

Isnt that an Executive Order from Commander in Chief?

3
MiyamotoHolliday 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Our own military" is honestly, right now, severely outclassed in everything but equipment (except individual weapon systems, carbines and pistols) by the Global War on Terror veterans... and a bunch would defect with their equipment if what you said played out.

2
MiyamotoHolliday 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought ol "Get Out" guy released one RIGHT after Trump's victory and inauguration? Deep fake of Obama. He did the voice for it... not that well.

4
MiyamotoHolliday 4 points ago +4 / -0

At one point calling someone "yellow" would've fit the definition. The vagueness allows for it to work over time.

I dont like codified laws on speech. I prefer the rights come with responsibilities model. We are capable of policing ourselves and others in the moment if we are raised right.

2
MiyamotoHolliday 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, go grab the shoes off of people who most certainly have security around... or from the home of people who certainly have private security in their gated community that will respond within 30 seconds to s silent alarm?

by BQnita
8
MiyamotoHolliday 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's weird considering there's tons of businesses designed around attaining just one specific government contract and nothing else. No private sector activity. Just heaps of start up costs associated with having the requirements to bid on a certain gov contract.

Idk about municipalities though. I only know federal security contracting.

4
MiyamotoHolliday 4 points ago +4 / -0

Depending on the state, that wont fly with that strong of a word.

According to the Texas Penal Code, you can be charged with disorderly conduct if you do any of these in a public place:

  1. Use “abusive, indecent, profane, or vulgar language,” of the kind likely to provoke a physical altercation. These are known legally as “fighting words.”
1
MiyamotoHolliday 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most states and SCOTUS have recognized restrictions on the first amendment. Personally, I take a "rights come with responsibilities" approach that I think should be taught instead of having laws that limit our rights. We can all take the responsibility to no use our rights in harmful ways, so to speak. But in Texas, for instance, you've lost the right to free speech when you use speech that tends to "cause a breech of the peace". I would assume slurs that have a history of causing fights fall into this area and that those slurs change over time. In 1880, calling someone "yellow" might get you shot, for instance. Not sure "cunt" falls into that, but it might because the law is subjective in nature.

6
MiyamotoHolliday 6 points ago +7 / -1

Q refers to the poster. They/It posted on boards that spun of off 4chan. 4chan users have long called themselves "anon" because of the "anonymous" username that used to appear above basically every post. Q and Anon is two different things.

Im what's known as an "oldfag" because I fucks with 4chan since the Boxxy days.

All I know about Q for sure at this point is that Q people fucking hate pedophiles and anyone claiming to know what or who Q is is full of shit.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›