2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

This technology is not new. In fact, it has been around for almost 10 years. I advised the regulatory pathway for FDA's approval of Otsuka's MyCite the line extension for Abilify (aripiprazole) used to treat bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome. MyCite has an ingestible event monitor (IEM) compressed with the tablet which is ingested. As the tablet disintegrates in stomach fluid the IEM comes into contact with the liquid, activating a "battery" which sends a signal to a patch worn on the wrist of the patient. The patch sends a signal to a cloud-based database which is accessible by the patient's physician who can then monitor his patient's compliance with the treatment protocol. Bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome patients are notoriously noncompliant with treatment regimens, and this in part overcomes that.

Bourla adapting this tech to his CV-19 tablet for monitoring purposes is something which can be defeated simply by dropping the pill + IEM into water, having the cloud signalling patch close by and letting it send its signal to whatever database collects it. Bourla is just jacking off here.

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

If one knows Feynman's work one also knows of his passion for identifying "first causes." Does Feynman claim that water is the first cause of protein? Does he claim that water in and of itself gives rise to carboniferous macromolecules? Have you studied Feynman closely enough to know yourself?

4
My2SonsAreMarines 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you do not have the ability to communicate on a level that shows you even understand Feynman, you are merely employing the argumentative fallacy of appealing to authority. When you say, "If you want to check out his ideas, in his words (since mine might be incomplete), ...," you have effectively admitted that you have no competence of your own to rely on to be able to hold up your side of a debate.

It has been <40 years since Feynman published his 4 lectures in "QED" and you can find a copy of it on the internet today for $1.55. But in spite of what he wrote the periodic table still exists today, as do principles of atomic theory, even as they did before Feynman was even born.

You have purloined the reputation of Feynman to buttress our own in this discussion, So why don't you, then, do some intellectual heavy lifting for a change and get back to me with where you think Feynman claims that water in and of itself gives rise to protein, even as you have claimed. We'll see if you have interpreted him correctly, and we can go from there.

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Rather, it sends signals to the water to tell the water what to do. The water then makes the proteins, which make up the building blocks of the human body.

If this theory is correct, ...."

I am a biochemist. His premise is not correct. Water in and of itself contains no carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, etc. - water does not make protein.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +3 / -2

And you think Communist China going after the Republic of Taiwan - THE #1 sophisticated chip maker in the world -- is a good thing, why?

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am still "class of 1998" over there, but I rarely visit there anymore, since they are largely populated with rusty nail chewing doomers. Was a great place to post and debate at one time, but things really went south when Rudy supporters got banned in 2008, at the time he was running for Prez (I was not one of those who was a Rudy supporter but was appalled at the treatment of Rudy supporters). Given Rudy's unfailing loyalty to Trump I wonder what the excommunicators over there now think of those Rudy supporters in retrospect. It is not like FR will reach out and invite them back.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

"He never bothered to tell the truth about the communist in the government."

If you have the capability of reading as much as you seem to have the capability of whining mindlessly, you should get a copy of Reagan's "Speaking My Mind," and get back to us with a better informed viewpoint.

Reagan's policies singularly defeated the Communist Soviet Union and he won the Cold War without firing a shot, and did so against a deep state that tried to kill him. What does someone like that have to do for an encore to please your small, forgetful, unappreciative mind, spoiled in your petulance, and steeped in selfish unthankfulness?

It is no surprise that later generations would fail to appreciate what Reagan's victories in 1980 an 1984 were all about.

As someone who was raised in the conservative movement beginning with Goldwater in '64, I watched Reagan begin to take the reins of thought leadership away from the deep state uniparty with his victory in 1966 in the California governor's race and straight through to almost securing the 1976 Presidential nomination against the incumbent, Gerald Ford. He brought victory in 1980 along with a Senate majority for this first time since 1954.

I lived through this time and prospered under Reagan's presidency. His "Star Wars" program bankrupted the Soviet Union in the technology arms race and Trump's Space Force will ultimately do-in the electoral theft by the deep state Communist infiltrators who were in his Administration too.

Look in the mirror and come face to face with the real self-serving coward

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

Socialism comes in many forms and is a philosophy marketed under a number of different and sometimes competing brands.

National Socialism was allied with Italy's Mussolini philosophically because each of their socialistic systems practiced a form of socialism called, fascism - private ownership of property, controlled by government. e.g., The conglomerate IG Farben Industrie prospered under Hitler's nazi regime. US Constitutionalism has in many ways been replaced in the USA by corporate fascism = government socialism promoting the profit of select "elite" mega-businesses, many of which are war materials procurers and "health" industrialists.

Communism - led globally at one time by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics aka USSR aka Russia + what constituted its Soviets "republics"/satellites, practices socialism as government ownership of all aspects of production -- no private ownership. Common-ownership of all by the overlord State.

Communist satellite governments exist or have existed under false branding: Democratic Republic of Vietnam (N. Vietnam), Deutsche Demokratische Republik (East Germany), and as you note Democratic People's Republic of North Korea. None of these nations are "democratic" by any stretch, unless you want call "Communist Party A" v. "Communist Party B" a "democracy." The Democratic Republic of the Congo is not run by a unitary Communist dictatorship like its similarly named North Korean "People's" counterpart or the "People's" Republic of China.

Your point manifests confusion. Nazis = shortened for National Socialists that is per Encyclopedia Britannica: "Nazi Party, by name of National Socialist German Workers’ Party, German Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP)" - a controlling political party of Germany from 1933-1945. Nazi Gemany's formal name was the German Reich and later the Greater German Reich

Socialism is the core philosophy of Naziism, fascism, and communism. Stalin's Communists once allied with Hitler fought nazi fascists in WWII when Nazis invaded the USSR. Communist USSR fought Communist Chinese even after assisting the ChiComs coming to power. The US exploited this rivalry as Nixon played the "China card" against the Soviets toward the end of the war. Communist Chinese and Communist Vietnamese clashed militarily in 1979.

Commie v Commie = Socialist v Socialist. Nazi fascist v Soviet Commie = Socialist v Socialist.

Nazis were, are, and have always been socialists, even as Communists were, are, and have always been socialists.

Your statement, "The nazis hated socialists and communists " making reference simply to socialists makes no historical sense whatsoever.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

"The nazis hated socialists and communists. "

You do realize of course that the term "Nazi," is a contraction of the full term, "National Socialist," right?

So, what you are saying then is the Nazi's hated themselves, because they were socialists?

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, there it is:

Human Gene Therapy Products Incorporating Human Genome Editing: Draft Guidance for Industry

"For in vivo genome modification, GE components may be delivered by viral vectors or nanoparticles. When choosing an in vivo delivery method, it is important to consider the ability of the delivery vector to target the cells/tissue of interest and minimize distribution to non-targeted tissue. Consideration should also be given to the ability to control expression of vector delivered GE components (e.g., using tissue-specific promoters, small molecule inhibitors), if appropriate. Viral vectors may support sustained expression of GE component transgenes, and nanoparticles may allow the temporal delivery of GE components as messenger RNAs or proteins. The potential for vector-mediated toxicity as well as pre-existing immunity to the GE component and vector should also be considered. The sponsor should select the appropriate delivery method based on the intended use. "

https://www.fda.gov/media/156894/download

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Jesus Christ IS the Tao. and IS IN every human, regardless of their path."

Respectfully, Jesus Christ is God.

Where Tao may be translated as "the way," as I noted earlier, this would be something that was adopted by I Ching directly from the identity of the Prime Mover of all Creation as Jesus Christ claims, "I am the way, the Truth, and the Life."

Tao does not claim to be the embodiment of Truth and Tao is not the giver of Life. It is something less, and therefore, the Tao is not Jesus Christ as you have claimed.

The Spirit of Christ does not live in all men even as I gave examples of in my last posting, and I will not belabor again here.

"what I mean by incomplete is that the bible does not describe all of history or science"

The Bible beginning in Genesis is history. Jesus Christ established Natural Law at the beginning of time, and Natural Law is the predicate to all Laws of Science within which the study of true science may flourish. Again, as John 1 says: "And He is before all things and by Him all things consist." Let that sink in.

"some info it leaves out is still true, and is covered by other religions..."

What do other religions cover that is truthful and foundational to life that he Bible does not?

re: the Theory of Everything --- is a movie from 2014 about the life and philosophy of the atheist Steven Hawking, and is taken from a term he coined. You are correct to say that Christianity is not something defined by an athesit philosopher who has upon his passing met his Creator and at this moment likely sees the world and this life very differently from what he contemplated in life.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus Christ as the Creator of all precedes the Tao, and as the passage from John chapter 1 is quoted "And He is before all things, and by Him all things consist." Any good that there is in this world is only so on account of the Person of Jesus Christ. It is no wonder that other religions might borrow from or be informed by the moralities embodied in the Person of the Prime Mover.

Even atheists often find themselves borrowing their sense of morality from what are at their root Christian principles, however, while they may borrow Christianity to have a standard at all by which to measure right and wrong, their worldview is inherently devoid of such a standard, defining what is "good" essentially in terms of what is what they perceive - rightly or wrongly - o be "good" for them, and advances themselves, regardless of the possible expense to others (Malthusian materialism), and it is not the equal of Christianity, which by contrast is based in love and self-sacrifice on behalf of others -- principles as embodied in the life, the example, the eternal sufficiency of the sacrifice of, and the person of Jesus Christ.

No other religion on its own is comparable to Christianity is this regard.

Jesus Christ is not to be found in all walks of life. For instance, Jesus Christ is not present in the walk of life chosen by a thief, a liar, a prostitute, or a murderer - just to mention a few.

You say I offer nothing but Scripture, but at least I offer something upon which to base what I am saying - quoting the Words of the Prime Author of the Christian faith.

You say that "Biblical Christianity offers a useful understanding, but not a complete one," but without meaningful discussion, this is a pregnant statement that exists without substance. Feel free to elaborate.

4
My2SonsAreMarines 4 points ago +5 / -1

When Jesus says: I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life; no man comes to the Father except by Me." (John 14:6), that is a Truth claim exclusive to Jesus Christ. All "religions" do not lead to this conclusion, and "religions" that do not ascribe to this unique and exclusive Truth claim are not of Jesus Christ.

"There is a way which seems right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death" (Proverbs 14:12)

No, all "religious" roads do not lead to Christ.

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

God's own finger wrote the 10 Commandments (Exodus 31:17-18), and he says he did it in 6 days, not 6000 years. The 10 Commandments are The Law given by the Supreme Law Giver. They are not open to private interpretation.

Read the text of the 4th Commandment regarding the keeping of the Sabbath, Exodus 20:11. There is no translational mis-understanding between Hebrew and English in this context.

Jesus Christ is described as the Creator of the entire Universe (John 1:1-5), and also described as the Author and finisher of our Faith (Hebrews 12:2). It is up to us to read what The Author has written Himself quite plainly, and to trust what He has said is Truth.

Jesus Christ is "The Way, the Truth, and the Life; no man comes to the Father except by Me." (John 14:6) This is a truth claim which you choose to believe as a celebration of the certainty of your eternal salvation, or not, -- choosing instead to die in your sin without claiming Christ's free gift of eternal life, that His own sacrifice on the cross made possible - done, as it was, on your behalf.

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

FDA's regulatory powers govern interstate distribution of drugs. State formularies can do as they choose to do within a State. That is how medical marijuana is allowed in many States and not subject to Federal Laws and FDA unless someone tries to ferry it over state lines.

NH can authorize tableters or capsule fillers at local compounding pharmacies to make ivermectin available to patients and healthy individuals inside of the State of NH without a prescription being required from a licensed medical practitioner.

6
My2SonsAreMarines 6 points ago +6 / -0

I have posted this prayer on a couple of threads here at GA and Patriots. You will not find it cut'n'pasted from the wider internet. I am the sole author. Many who have read it have agreed to join with me in this prayer daily. It is a prayer based in Scripture, consult the references. Be emboldened:

A Prayer for the Tip of the Spear:

Dear God,

Confound our enemies.

Cause the Deep State, the Shadow Government, and the Cabal to become the laughing stock of all time.

Go Psalm 2, Psalm 10, Psalm 35, Psalm 37, Psalm 59, Psalm 73 on all of our shared enemies: The Deep State, The Shadow Government, The Cabal. Finish them off with Psalm 109, remove them from power; give them no future.

Shelter us under the wings of Your protection as you have promised in Psalm 91.

Give us visibility to our protection even as You sent your visible angels to protect Elisha - greater are those with us than are with them. Send our opposition into blind confusion again as you did then. (2 Kings 6)

Allow Your servant, Donald Trump, to continue to lead like Gideon; let our opposition destroy themselves in their confusion as did the Midianites. (Judges 6-8).

Assure us that we need not fear our opponents, since, while we may not have complete visibility to it all yet, You have already won the war.

Cause our enemies who have amassed themselves against us to flee from us in fear as did the Syrians from Jerusalem. (2 Kings 7: 1-16)

Wipe out our enemies even as You did the armies of Sennacherib before Jerusalem - 185,000 of the enemy laid dead without swinging a single sword, or sustaining a single loss of one of Your own. (2 Kings 18-19)

Give our opposition an opportunity to repent, to lay down their weapons, and to cease making war with us. Have mercy on the red-pilled.

If the enemy fail or refuse to do so, as the vessels fitted for destruction that they likely are (Romans 9:21-23) destroy them entirely, and visit upon them ten times the pain and suffering that they hoped to visit upon Your people.

Let the whole World see and recognize that You are Just, that it is You that has done this great thing on behalf of His people, that the whole World will see that it is You who will defend His people, and that it is You who will be sure to more than settle the score.

Bless the Tip of the Spear: Donald Trump, Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, Michael Flynn, Mike Lindell. Bless Your servant messengers: James O'Keefe and Steve Bannon's "War Room," among others. Preserve and protect each of them as Your chosen ones in this time to motivate us in battle and to encourage us in the fight. Make us force multipliers.

Be with each of us, even as You have promised that You will never leave us or forsake us (Deuteronomy 31:6), as You stand together with us against the principalities, the powers, and the rulers of the darkness of this world (Ephesians 6:12-18).

Give us the courage to stand, as You control the shape of the battle. May You find us faithful.

In Jesus Christ's holy Name, we pray.

by jdqw210
2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the same young lady who allegedly jumped out the window of her apartment building last month, is it not? She was based.

4
My2SonsAreMarines 4 points ago +4 / -0

The SCOTUS will take this into account in regard to still-pending litigation. It's a "sense of the Senate" vote statement. Particularly noteworthy that 6 (D) Senators were not even present for the vote, yet the vote was still scheduled. Unlikely Schumer is in control on this. Were Manchin and Sinema 2 of the absentees along with that New Mexico stroke-out?

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

Drug approval submissions to FDA are contained in 5 Modules

  1. Administrative and labeling data
  2. Summaries of clinical and manufacturing data
  3. Manufacturing data, including for drug substance and drug formulation
  4. Non-clinical tox study data
  5. Clinical trials and reporting

This visual is from Module 5 Safety data. What I really want to see is Module 3 Drug Substance and Drug Product information. The mRNA coding for the Spike protein is the drug substance. The formulation is where the suspected graphene content resides, but formulation information has been completely hidden to this day and has not been disclosed in labeling as is required by law and regulation for purposes of obtaining informed consent of medication recipients.

1
My2SonsAreMarines 1 point ago +1 / -0

How hard would it be for the tow trucks observed in the act of towing a protester to be boxed in by other tractor trailers, rendering their effort useless?

2
My2SonsAreMarines 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Trump is made Speaker and Biden/Harris are both impeached immediately (at least as quickly as Trump was impeached the 2nd time), Trump as 3rd in line automatically becomes President. He can serve in that role up until 2024, run for President again, win, and in aggregate, we will have had the pleasure of having Trump in for a total of 10 years. These 2 years in the wilderness (2021-2022) would be the "dark" which becomes "light" and as he promised, we will be very happy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›