No?
Police back up at protests all the time. Crowds can rush forward, or merely advance. It happens all the time.
No it is fake. And it's not the first one where that chant is pasted over vid.
It's fake. And not the first one that chant has been pasted over.
The chant is pulled from some sporting event. They select a video where you don't see the crowd supposedly chanting except during a quick pan that jerks back and timed so there's never a clear moment in which you can, or ought to be able to, see mouths move in unism producing the chant.
At best it's some nobody chasing tiktok clout. At worst, it's manufactured to manipulate you into belief or action.
Guys, this is fake.
This is the second time I've seen this chant pasted over video. And again, video is selected and timed with the audio specifically so there's never a point you can see mouths in the crowd move in unism. They select video with quick back and forth pans/jerks.
This is some footbul/cricket/hockey/college football chant pasted over video. At best someone is chasing tiktok views. At worst the goal is to manipulate you into belief or action.
I'm pretty sure any person who kills UN jack boots on US soldier isn't getting taken in alive, will take out more than one sent to take them in, will give pause to anyone thinking to try it again, and will end up with statues.
Just you wait for corn-flu
Only the government can raise animals or crops. Too dangerous for regular people.
It's like the Cartman Anne Frank episode, only with chickens instead of cats.
SF Resident here.
They want liberals who won't slow roll the reopening from corona. They don't understand why they can't get 'normal' liberals, just without the 'politics'.
I spent 60 seconds skimming and it looks like a DARPA proposal for solicitation of approaches for next gen non surgical neural interface. At face value is has absolutely nothing to do with anything covid related, let alone the HIV false positives or the immune deficiency reports.
I know there are (yet unsubstabtiated) hypothesis that the vax contains any number of substances with alternative nefarious uses (such as facilitating biometirc monitoring or control) so that might be what the individual was suspecting. And maybe somewhere in there is something eyebrow raising, but I'm not going any deeper than a skim on the off chance. Nothing jumped out to me. No sections detailing what any of it would require or uitilize so it's not as if there was a readily apparent connection that existed to be made.
It really seems like independant things:
-
Spike protein destroys to some degree the immune systems of some people for some window of time
-
Spike protein false positives the HIV antibody tests much in the same way that FLUV can false positive the COVID PCR tests.
Because HIV and AIDS are connected, people are assuming 1+2 also connect, but I'm pretty very sure they don't connect.
Just because you test positive for HIV does not mean you have been infected with the HIV virus.
HIV and AIDS are not synonymous. HIV is a virus. AIDS is the condition that results from the virus fucking your shit up. The vaccinated may end up having their immune system fucked up. They may end up with the same end results (AIDS) but it is not because the vaccine "gave them HIV". The false positive on HIV tests has been known for a long time and my understanding is it's because the spike protein is sufficiently similar to a protein in HIV used for detection in those tests.
Health professionals suffering from AIDS aren't going to be convinced they have HIV just because they pass an HIV test. Please please make the distinction between these three things:
-
Auto Immune Deficiency Syndrome (a condition)
-
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (a virus)
-
Spike protein (being detected by HIV tests the way FLUV can be detected by a covid test)
Aside from the parralels, there are some interesting insights buried in the short clip and I'm very excited to see what the full movie offers. Thanks for finding and posting.
"What's the matter coffin maker?"
"When they die in these numbers, they don't bother wth coffins"
Q is neither god, nor infalible, nor does gold ernding the fed become an argument against crypto. You don't need a chip in your hand to transact Monero.
Mediums of exchange have two sources of worht:
-
Intrinsic - this would be any alternative use. Silver for example has alternative uses in electronics. Dollars can't even be used as toilet paper because they'll clog the drains.
-
Utility - This goes beyond merely the utility as a medium. Paper is light weight and therefore easy to transport, can be denominated conveniently, and digital forms may be transacted instantly across vast distances.
So stop. Even fiat has 'worth'. It derives it's worth from it's utiltiy. The problem is that the utility does not exeed it's inherent liabilities, notably that it controlled by a central authority who can at any time 'cheat' and break the rules.
Crypto has extreme utility, and that is entirely why it is worth what it is. Anyone who sees the collapse of fiat coming can recognize just how valueable a DECENTRALIZED, TRUSTLESS, PERMISSIONLESS medium of exchange is. One that you can't be deplatformed from, that carries zero counterparty risk, and is immutable from a centralized authority rug pulling, is a medium that would prevent what we are about to go through.
The collapse, destitution, starvation, and mass missery about to flood across the world could have all been avereted but for a DECENTRALIZED, TRUSTLESS, PERMISSIONLESS medium of exchange. What crypto brings to the table is the progress we've seen without the collapse that follows.
Crypto isn't worthless. It is worth far more than even the most bullish value it today. Right now only a fraction of the world recognize the utility, and have acquired a stake, yet the whole world requires the utility only a cryptographically secured blockchain can provide. You can buy in a greater stake than you will in a decade, and that remains as true today in 2022 as it was in 2012.
You can be a coward and safe or brave and true
You can live the most comfortable life, or the best life
I never mentioned etherium
You mentioned WHACKD alongside DWAC
Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian
Similar but distinct from DRS'ing, though I'm unqualified to weigh in on the distinction
I don't think you even know what that is
Obviously that's we're talking about the token since you discussed it in the same context as the security.
Low volume items aren't the metric for if supplies are making it then are they?
The high volume ones are. Those do not have a stockpile and will not last a week let alone months without additional shipments making it through. I am elabotrate because somehow something isn't clicking for you and you're not making an argument as to what that is.
Amazon does notoperate using a 90's fullfillment model where you maintain a large stock and reorder as it gets low. Theyutilize a just in time fullfillment system which reduces footprint massively. They don't keep stock. Those Amazon warehouses are distribution hubs for receiving and quickly distributing out.
They could not last a week, let alone months. Their just in time fulfillment model is literally what their business model relies on, (partly) why they smoked their competitors, and is entirely incompatible with the hypothesis that chinese goods are being denied offloading at US ports due to an EO from Trump.
Yes, that is what the hypothesis predicts.
But the fact that they are not out of stock, refutes this hypothesis. Amazon uses a just in time inventory system (that's literally what their business model revolves around) so unless you think this EO just kicked in yesterday, then the fact that they are not out of stock is evidence the hypothesis is incorrect. They do not stock inventory to last a week let alone multiple months.
No dude.
When you click 'buy', the item that they shipped 2 weeks in advance (because they sell on average x units per day) that just arrived in port yesterday and arrived in the warehouse 3 hours earlier is allocated to you and shipped out. It arrives at your local distribution hub 1 dday later, and your home same day or the next (1-2 day shiping)
And had you waited 24 hours before buying, you'd have gotten the item that arrived on the ship the following day. They order and receive constantly, in advance.
If enough orders are placed for that item from that warehouse, the supply tally will decrease to a preset replenishment level
No. They do not keep 10,000 units on hand, then place an 8k order when it hits 5,000, so they get back up to to 10,000 when their 2 week shipment finally arrives when they are then below 2k units and running real low. That's 90's fullfillment. Amazon broke the model by going 'just in time' and being able to offer lower prices in part due to needing a tiny fraction of the amount of warehouse space.
If they sell 500 units a day. They have 500 units arrive every day, with maybe a few hunded more as a buffer. The consequence is an insanely lowered warehouse footprint which saves a ton of money and allows them to redirect and instead open ton of region 'distribution' centers rather than larger stocking facilities - this regionality then allows for 1-2 day shipping.
All because they do what you can't fathom as actually being possible - have the item you purchase ordered and on a boat two weeks before you hit the buy button, using predictive statistical modeling, dynamic pricing, and product nudging (they order too much of something, it shows up in your feed for less, they order two few and it shows up costing more and you get shown alternatives first)
This is (in part) how Amazon stole the market.
Again. Nothing wrong with being born Kenyan except that he burried the truth of it.
His mother was an American citizen, therefore he is an american citizen. It changes nothing.