I get all of that. I do. Thanks for both previous comments, but why haven’t any legal pedes taken the argument and said…okay you isolated it, according to your documents, culture it, fill up some chicken eggs with virus and formaldehyde, and distribute it? The mRNA vector is the problem. I also think Trump’s plan exposed them all. Trump’s vaccine infowar is well documented. I still don’t quite get why he said he took it.
I actually didn’t know they actually isolated it…they say.
I know depopulation and control is the agenda. It’s too obvious.
Here it is at the CDC.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/COVID-19-related-codes.html
Large Oil & Gas company says they are waiting to see what OSHA will say. It'll be litigated.
Here's a little nugget of fact that you might be able to use. This is an NIH press release for Pfizer saying they do not plan to produce Comirnaty (approved). Meaning their coercion for an EUA drug is illegal.
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/dailymed-announcements-details.cfm?date=2021-09-13
I don’t want to think that way, but….
The date-faggiin is a major opposition point.
I think in terms of physics, momentum. The swing has a period…a resonance…a frequency…an inflection point.
This battle began a long time ago. Can we logically expect to resolve it in four years?
I agree. The “receipts” lie here. IMO. To me, they progressed in darkness. HIV took years to isolate. This was isolated quickly, according to them.
The difference is the vector. Why is it no one is asking this question? The mRNA vector is only viable if it’s not isolated. The mRNA vector is a modeled, partial response.