I'm done, for today. This level of cognitive dissonance broke my thinker.
While potentially correct (it was not a firm positive, but a maybe/probably), that still applies to the altered portions of the genome, as IP, not necessarily the actual people involved. IoW, it's likely that such patenting would just mean that Moderna, or whomever, could use DNA sequencing to prove that a competitor violated their patent with Treatment X.
For another analogy, patents on how your fancy new car's electronic stability control works doesn't make the car not yours. It just makes that particular combination of sensors, actuators, software behaviors, etc. not yours to commercially reproduce and sell.
Now, even if it did get ruled that natural vs unnatural DNA alteration changed your personhood status in some legal way, you would still have had to have that change made with full knowledge and consent, at the time of, "treatment," for it to hold any weight. If done to you without knowledge and consent, or under duress, then it's no good, as a way to deny rights because of the consequences. Informed consent has already been blown out of the water, across many dimensions, plus there's the use of coercion, as it concerns the jabs. I think the only ones that would be affected by this is some crazy way would be designer babies - genetically altered from conception, or during gestation, with the parents' informed consent. Vax babies aught to fall under similar pretext as vaxxed parents.
Everyone has them. Subsaharan Africans not having any was not correct, it turned out. They were like the Irish: they fucked around, and found...their way into everybody's family tree.
But the seller should be trying to make a profit. WTF?
Sure. Then, around midnight, they'll still magically win their reelections.
I'd be on the backwoods gunner's side, were it true. WTF are they doing having around your low altitude airspace?
Seems to me like a case for 1) showing that military might against citizenry may have some serious limits, 2) that the F-35 really is nothing but a big money pit (the F-22 was a big money pit, but it did eventually do its job as promised), and 3) if they can't secure the ground at home, what hope do they have when every foreign brown 12-50 year old might be willing to die to take one of these babies out? If they try to make this a 2A killer, it will backfire hilariously (even before evidence comes out about what actually happened).
Should have used F-16s. POTUS knows you can't fight against those.
50 years on, these janky jets are still taking themselves apart.
5, now? But, dude, it's been 12 years, ever since my dad was a little kid! What happened?
I don't see why it wouldn't. 5-10MBps was quite doable on 4G, prior to the 5G rollout.
While more study on specifics would be nice, you can pretty much go back to physics, for which they use an oversimplified conception of ionizing radiation vs safe radiation. It's not like that. As you go down in frequency, and thus energy density, the dosage needed to cause certain biological problems increases, even if a single energized particle isn'tenough to cause serious molecular damage. It's not safe just because it won't rend DNA with the minimum possible exposure.
They also did not do requisite safety research for 5G, just like a certain jab. Any of these modern wireless data technologies has human costs and risks, that need to be weighed against their benefits; and the transceivers need to be placed away from humans to an extent based on said never-done research.
That said, the way they're packing data, for 5G, is effectively creating bursts of those nasty high frequencies we're taught to avoid exposure to, except possibly on the low 500-700MHz bands. And 5G UC...just because that DEW can make the next Pokemon Go look like it was rendered on a RTX 4090 doesn't mean it won't slowly cook you.
They can so that, anyway, at least well enough. How many people turn location off, when not actively using it? Very few. The data is neatly formatted and stored for them by Apple and Google. Cell tower triangulation really isn't that precise, and can end way off, sometimes.
OK, well, first, Benadryl is not a decongestant. It's a strong antihistamine.
Second, Sudafed barely works anymore, just like cough medicines don't, because they replaced the effective ingredients with shitty ones.
Those are rookie numbers! The jab aught to be up to at least 1M, by now.
A different take: conscious precognition is rare, and unreliable. What about unconscious precognition? People do utilize precognition, but have to do things like have groups look into the same future concern separately, and then interpret what they each see, symbolically. Much like astrology, there's something useful there, but not clear and concrete. Some people have been able to learn to remote view near future front page images, and even partial lotto numbers. Never anything good enough to be clear and actionable as intelligence (FI, mixing up 3/8, 1/7, or 6/9, or seeing a mirror or 180' rotated version, with the numbers), but far beyond mere luck.
If you look back, in 20/20, there are some oddities that show up, in addition to the more concrete examples of buildings, dates, etc.. Pop culture had a wave of Middle Eastern influence, leading up to 9/11, FI, that started dying down by '03 or so. The same can be said for China back in the early to mid 80s, just before they got their new economy working, and changed the industrialized world.
If we take a similar example, with gobs of parallels to nowadays, the original Deus Ex, there wasn't any spook involvement. The lack of twin towers was a technical issue, that they never worked around - but it would have been simple to do so, and they chose not to. The creators were a small group, with one of them having done only surface-level conspiracy theory research for the plot. They've all been looked into, and interviewed, over and over again. It's like they tapped into a line from the future.
I'm not doubting that intentional predictive programming exists (Contagion, anyone?). But, I wonder if many of these little, "coincidences," especiacially as found in highly visual arts of movies and video games, set in the future at the time of creation, might more often be from something deeper. Like, this important event occurring has been set in stone, and someone involved in the work in question is intuitively pulling it out of whatever it is they write it on up there.
The weather had already been bad, well before they started, and it's not hard to find years where it's been even worse. I see no divine judgment, there. The whole thing is just ironic, now, as the festival attracts mostly people that love, suck at the teets of, or gladly lick the boots of, "the man," that they symbolically burn, every year.
And here I got a basic 2-year community college degree, to stay within my means. A friend of mine got accepted at one of the big liberal arts unis, to the program of his dreams. He didn't go, though, because he knew even his dream job would never pay off the loans, and he couldn't get enough financial aid...back around 25 years ago, when they still had prestige, and tuition was a fraction of what it is today. Today, I can't even imagine the debt involved. But, let's just cancel this debt, for the irresponsible, instead of incentivizing schools to lower tuitions.
Probably increased another 400% in the last 2 years, or at least will have, once current happenings are historical records.
Around 10-12, I don't recall exactly when, I stumbled upon John Gatto's books, at my local library. I was able to confirm a handful on his claimed quotes and paraphrased bits from old powerful families via microfiche archives. It's been a slow progression of finding other bits and pieces, ever since, with some spikey info-sponging periods here and there.
If we're talking about someone with no specific power, not in a trusted position, then I'd say it is morally a gray area, at first glance. You'll need the totality of circumstances. FI, little Susie with no, or a weak, or an absent, father, slutting it up at 13, with a fake ID, should be given accountability, not victimhood. Depending on how developed she was, and how good she could act, those fooled might deserve some punishment, but not to have their lives ruined.
Teacher and student, though, is a clear one. Some states have laws that make it illegal for over 18, too. I don't doubt for a second that there are men that lack sufficient willpower, and get seduced, too. But, they should have done something to avoid that situation, before it went too far (unfortunately, TBF, the social situation, there, wrt to men, is pretty shit, these days).
It's a betrayal of trust. Teachers are given leeway to deal with annoying and sometimes complicated realities of dealing with kids that are not perfectly normal. They are expected to maintain certain boundaries. In many, if not most, cases, there is a lot of emotional manipulation going on, and that is what is likely to give them issues. Their brain-crippling sex drive being used against them, for the authority figure to get whatever they want from them. A bored horny hot teacher with few scruples getting with a student on amicable terms may be a fantasy, and like a fantasy, isn't real.
No doubt.
I started getting, "red pilled," unknowingly, many years ago, when our sheriff's dept took over the city cops. Turns out, it was part of a plan to clean them up, as, among other things, they were working with the local CPS/DeFaCS, or whatever they called it, then, in a big child prostitution ring. A bunch of them went to jail, things got a lot better, blah blah blah. The thing that stuck out was not that, but how this, which should have been front page news for a whole week (the local papers were more than pamphlets, still), was a couple buried articles in two papers. I knew to pay attention due to knowing people that knew people involved in the sheriff's dept. I heard the state was stonewalling them on some connections with CPS, too. The only way that happens is if the news guys were in on it, too. It's a big club, and we ain't in it.
Anywhere several big interstates converge, you can bet this stuff is going on, sadly.
If you have kids that ever alone at home, teach them to deny entry. Same to babysitters. You never know when you got the short straw drawn on you.
Which is why they screwed up chain of custody and the like, so badly, in 2020, that a quality audit could not be performed. The ballots were printed, with plain text vote info on them. A mere 3rd party paper recount could have do e thar, 2with the actual ballots, if the laws had been followed, regarding handling, transport, storage, etc.. Even if we go full paper, next time, the intermediate stages need to be watched over carefully, in big counties.
...and why did so many go along with it? FI, as long as they aren't unnecessarily creating panic, the government has no grounds on which to order broadcasters covering this as news. Unless they are all in on it.
What actress? Margo Robbie has been fairly well known for awhile. I wouldn't think too highly of Congress Critters, though. Definitely don't expect them to be on your side. Their goals may just align, for awhile. But, almost all of them got where they are by serving themselves first.
That will likely require a change to use of a consensus-based standard of care, unfortunately. Fraud is way easier.