So let’s do the calculations. I have the formula from that webpage you sent and just need the data the formula requires and we’ll be on our way.
Could you please provide the information that connects to this formula they reference?
-rate of formation of stars in the galaxy
-fraction of those stars with planetary systems
-number of planets per solar system with an environment suitable for life
-fraction of suitable life planets on which life actually appears
-fraction of life bearing planets on which intelligent life emerges (you can even count the planet on which you reside here)
-fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
-length of time such civilizations release detectable signals into space
Now I just need that data to plug into your formula please. And like you said, the math will prove this out.
Why don’t you quote the article you linked to and explain that, with logic, rather than moving on to another irrelevant metaphor?
Show me your ability to read, comprehend, and apply your own intellect and logic by quoting and discussing the article you shared.
You could go to their formula and explain the logic behind the data (pretending it exists - you don’t even have to give real numbers) to apply in the formula to “do math.”
You can’t. Because the article is comms and irrational nonsense that is intended to communicate one meaning to those who are comms aware and to put a veneer of intellectualism (faux) for the sheep. If you can’t see that, you should delete your Pepe.