by DMEC
1
Sumarongi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uh... two different camera? Not sure what you are getting at?

by DMEC
0
Sumarongi 0 points ago +1 / -1

And?

by DMEC
0
Sumarongi 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes it dies and Yes they would. It’s the angle of where it’s taken Imagine you are looking birds eye view from above: the two girls are lined up in the middle parallel/vertical with the podium, with Robert’s on the right and Biden on the left (in a cross pattern) Now switch the angle to the one side of the photograph, until the two girls will appear to the right of robert’s and Biden . Then, if you move the camera angle 180degrees the other direction (in the video) the two girls will appear on the left of the two. It takes some spatial reasoning, but that’s what’s going on.

by DMEC
4
Sumarongi 4 points ago +5 / -1

I did watch the video. And yes it can, if you understand where they were spatially. In picture you are looking head on and above, and the video you are looking, at a different angle to the side/rear, at the back of Bidens head. It was taken with a telephoto lens, which compresses the space behind him (visually), and thus the two girls appear closer and to the left. I would expect this. This is not proof of anything.

The inauguration may have been fake, but this is stupid shit.

by DMEC
3
Sumarongi 3 points ago +7 / -4

That’s because nothing is there. It’s the angle of the camera. People are being stupid

by DMEC
1
Sumarongi 1 point ago +9 / -8

It’s nothing, It’s the angle from the camera. People are just stupid

by DMEC
7
Sumarongi 7 points ago +7 / -0

Typo I’m sure

4
Sumarongi 4 points ago +4 / -0

Look at it the other way around, lenders are more inclined to lend their money to borrowers who have a history of paying off their debts in a timely manner. They are willing to lend to others who don’t have a history ’ but demand to be paid more for taking the risk. . It’s called a ‘risk premium’ and it’s totally moral and justified.

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don’t even need to do that. ‘Borrow “ 30trillion at negative interest rates and ‘eliminate’ the debt (leave the FeD holding the bag) Reinstitute, constitutional sovereign money creation. Institute free banking. Tell globalists to fuck offf

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s a short squeeze. Though inflation is a risk in the economy m, There are better explanations.

3
Sumarongi 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s a massive short squeeze. It’s likely the hedge funds have already bought back their stock. Nothing is going to happen on Friday, except a bunch of incels on 4chan will get burned

1
Sumarongi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, it’s a 10bln market cap. This is like telling every incel in California to pee in the ocean to drown Tokyo. Makes no sense

3
Sumarongi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wasn’t there a story a few days ago that they were ‘locked out’ ?

3
Sumarongi 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s article was supposedly bullshit according to Sydney Powell

1
Sumarongi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does he reference any current events?

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +2 / -0

What percentage of the population, do you guess, believe the virus is a hoax?

How aware are people there of ‘the great reset’?

Do they connect the dots between the ‘virus’ and ‘great reset’?

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is stupid

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›