Red Castle you say?
It ain't easy. You're the sovereign. If you judge that you owe taxes, pay them. If you judge otherwise, govern yourself accordingly. Some are willing to lose that which was mostly bribed to them on an unjust system.
Yes, END THE FED.
Good start. Don't forget Bank of North America 1781-1791; Civil War income tax 1862-1872+; corporate income tax 1909-; McFadden Act 1927+; Victory Tax 1942-1944+.
However, calling them "Inc." and saying they don't use that name is a bit disingenuous. You can still describe their private nature without engaging in the rhetoric. The facial "proofs" like drawing inferences from the signatures are also unconvincing.
Rather, the real IRS (renamed from the BIR founded 1862) and US Treasury are indeed still government agencies, but benefit from sovereign citizens' misunderstanding of their own sovereignty. They act like corporations but they are agencies of a federal government entity created by state governments created by We the People.
Collateralizing myriad myriads of debt slaves is of course the goal, to be done by any means conceivable. That includes being so confusing about their quasilegality that the rule of law begins to break down. Sovereigns holding their servant governments to the law, under God, is the solution.
Read Griffin again. Bad money drives out good. Our servant decided it correctly represented us to decree fiat currency, and this means sovereigns hide their good money.
We can only repent as a nation for allowing this so long and work together for the better system. During this inflection point, however, the alternative has already been crafted behind the scenes and we will need to review it rapidly and decisively. We trust God it will suffice and will be less corruptible than before.
AI is still pretty stupid. It's only the square root of its number, divided by the number of different ways dates can be counted (3 or more).
More likely: Trump having been selected early as a potential contender, in his 20s or so his actual birthdate, whatever it may be, is manually adjusted to a date significant if he happens to be inaugurated in 2021. Along the way Trump avoids the worst corruption and turns this preselection into his advantage. He then in recent years plots RFK's entry, on a complex schedule of many other things, to coincide with his own birthdate. Then they wait until anons get it themselves.
That is: Actual odds are much lower even if manipulation is not used. However, they are still high enough that manipulation becomes a tenable alternate theory. God allows it in either case, and he certainly gets credit for it working out that way, but sometimes minor selections by humans over time contribute therein.
Everything the enemy claims (e.g. shapeshifting) is a perversion of the transcendent Truth.
From G1 to R22 we know all about real shapeshifting. So the enemy floods us with counterfeits. Get Shapeshifted Quick. Horns/implants.
If it presents as Homo sapiens I give it initial credit as the image of God. There are means to revoke that credit. Any image of God can invoke them.
If it doesn't, it is subject to that image. Know any good Sasquatches? Chupacabras?
When Nephilim got started they demanded too much too soon and were totally obvious about it. 2020 is a dim echo of the celerity and rapacity they first used, yes we can call it in Atlantis. They realized that they could not do so again effectively and ever since then they've been shoehorning more and more into the prophesied structure. Then Jehu brings down the house.
Individually, build your network, know the transcendent Truth, past and future cannot gainsay the writ. Don't sweat what 'That Man' does.
as of right now I have never used a 'time machine'
Good one John! As of right now I've never used that particular dissembling. Oh wait.
I agree with Red October. I don't use the Q Clock, I use the moon (new year and annular eclipse is evening of 2 Oct, giving 22 days of heavy activity). September has been too quiet. My personal marching orders were received just in time.
My gut feeling is that TPTB are practicing for the event where Iran is blamed for attacking Israel but they don't have to guts to go live this year. So a dry run instead. If Trump had not intervened it would've been ready this year. When that happens, agreed that Dome against Dome is very likely!
Right now though there seems to be too much intent to create bad feelings against Israel's strategy. It's like CIA and Mossad are trying to self-destruct at the same time. I don't know who is the Israeli counterpart of NSA. I favor trusting IDF but not their comms.
I mostly concern myself with local events and wait for my servants (the governments) to recommend global courses of action to me (the sovereign) so that I can voice approval or disapproval. Locally, fight NWO agenda in education and relationship, e.g. My current research has been into flooding, with Helene being very indicative.
Familiarity with Turandot should help with local and national elections.
Thanks so much. Sometimes I write like Q, just for keeping up practice, plus I like the style.
You already know the time council permits no disclosure prior to its generally accepted public discovery. Only hints of the future are permitted. I've told people that before.
I hope I didn't shill, or disagree with your post, I meant to be fully supportive.
I'm one of the longest answerers here, did you want to pose any direct questions that need more elaboration?
Nikola Tesla.
Nikolas of Myra.
Not St. Germain, Nicholas Flamel. The former was just a Dantes, the latter was for real.
Not Seraphinianus, Voynich. Except I can't read it all yet.
"Felix" Trump does like Solve Et Coagula. Gold too.
Tangent: The philosopher's stone was publicly disclosed in the 20th century but they decided bismuth was a bit easier to produce so they nixed gold when they could've done it.
However, his work is undone and will remain so, KEEP PRAYING, other deceptions are at work, beast succeeds beast, beast transcends beast.
Alchemy is not about physical gold. What is it about?
Alchemy is not about physical gold. What should it be about?
Four falls of man to recover from?
When did year 6000 usher in the micro-millennium? God knows and the angels know.
Fact: Chuck Norris will successfully wrestle an angel at age 97.
He seems to be addressing rumors of his death:
u/aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve u/Bedminster u/Kenphut u/LoneWulf u/Sadness
No evidence of anything other than opportunist greedy India website that backdates alternate history timelines. Too bad.
Of course he's the God of warriors and storms, he's the God of everything, duh.
"Dr. Justin Sledge" of "Esoterica" reports at 4:30, "Virtually everything I'm going to say in this episode can and would be taken up, taken to task by an army of specialists and can in no way, in no way taken to be definitive because there is simply that little consensus among the specialists."
However, he does seem to be taking a fair though higher-critical tack, and is presenting the evidence that can be backed up scientifically. The Soleb inscription by Amenhotep III ca. 1400 BC is legitimate and I was unaware of it; it contains reed-reed, reed-shelter, lasso, quail-chick, spelling Y, H, W', W, and it depicts a Semitic shasu (nomad). So this is not a far-out review and is more moderate than Eric Coomer, but it's not fundamentalist either.
However, many lines of evidence show the linguistic traditions are much older than the higher critics give them credit for; I've documented several sources, like the Rhind and Hearst papyri, consistent with the Exodus being part of the Hyksos expulsion in 1539 BC, and Deuteronomy's suzerainty form of 1499 BC is much older than the oldest document admitted by OP, Deborah's song of 1308 BC (by which time the dominant Levantine treaty form had changed significantly). Ahmose's Tempest Stele (18th dynasty) is sometimes almost verbatim with the plagues of Exodus 7-12. Therefore OP is not extremely problematic but seeks a relatively rational critical approach.
It appears OP author merely added Routh to his article after the fact, indicating (but not proving) the site just says, and backdates, crazy things to get clicks. Connecting Routh to Azov and Medvedev is enough.
Yes, article was modified, Heckman made another article today about Routh so we was back-inserting his data, but it's just trolling data intended to get clicks and (secondarily) to confuse the narrative. Routh with Azov and Medvedev is bad enough.
Looks like if a Homo rapax is a useful (not predator-programmed) name, its interfertility would indicate stronger tests are needed than mere pleasure-response monitoring. Since I just call the subject predators "satanists" for simplicity and they can be of any race, the spiritual (nonphysical) tools unique to Christians are essential components (Trump knows this and constantly asks for Christian prayer). Do you think our 500,000 sealed indictments indicate we may be on the right path and we need to hold the line by spotting both physical and spiritual indicators of predation (whether parasitically-inspired or deliberate)?
Richard Gage always has new angles! Way ahead of the evidence game.
THIS IS ACTUALLY CORRECT! In 4 weeks the narrative will be that we must respect the voodoo religion where pet-eating and cannibalism are acknowledged to be appeals to satan to intervene. But satan is bound with a chain almost as great as his future one. America is Christian and tolerates freedom within natural limits, but not the freedom to break moral law and sin unto death.
The Plan appears to be to have one month to parlay human trafficking, pedophilia, satanism, Obama's bio-admitted dog-eating, and all of it into one publicly recognized snowball that Jehu can destroy all at once. Biblical.
All the planes appear real to me. But evidence indicates the Pentagon was not hit by a plane, that one was ditched in the sea IMHO. Immediately after the Pentagon was struck, the "Doomsday Plane" was noticed by several witnesses in the vicinity, which suggests to me that the Doomsday Plane also accounted for all prestrike views.
Barbara Olson's phone call described by her husband Ted was fake because it didn't appear on any of the subpoenaed phone logs. Plus, it was the only evidence whatsoever that box cutters were involved, which was the only reason TSA began to confiscate all blades. Funny chain there.
The idea that the second NY plane was "bouncy" in video is new to me, I doubt it has legs.
The righteous do go right to Paradise and Jesus's presence, and the wicked do go right to torment in the lower Unseen. But there are greater heavens and hells to come, and so we should not get sidetracked by any slight inaccuracies in the sales pitches that focus validly on the heavenly and hellish aspects of the spirit departing the body. There are many Scriptures indicating that time and change still govern, such as the fruit of the Tree of Life being new every month.
One problem is that Wierwille hand-picked Craig Martindale as successor president, whose sexual victimization, corruption, and breach of contract against Frances Allen were found to be viable claims in court in 2000 and settled privately.
The group itself, The Way International, may be coming along in its theology but this is a flashing red warning siren that pursuit of truth is not the only thing going on. Same sex problems happened to WCG but it reformed and renamed itself (GCI) faster than TWI has come along.
The truth is that there's certainly an improvement in the heavenly state when Christ returns, but there is also a heavenly state right now known as Paradise and Abraham's bosom as others point out. I understand TWI agrees with Eccl. 12:7 that the spirit returns to God, but for it to speculate further against its consciousness requires grappling with the other passages.
Churchgoers who don't look into it get confused with the instant-gratification message that death automatically means "the highest heaven". Because I believe it's heavenly in its experience, it's not wrong to call it "heaven", but because there is a greater heaven to come it's more accurate to call it an intermediate state and the presence of Christ, as Ligonier rightly points out (the second quote above looks like someone else). But when they see the Bible using more moderate language than they've been "sold", they often overcompensate and deny all consciousness instead of admitting it's a different kind of consciousness than we are familiar with.
But people who go a fully unconscious soul-sleep route, under any name, have a whole lot of verses to deal with, like Paul's desire to be with Christ, that are not easily parried and that are not persuasive in the Greek workarounds that have been proposed for them.
You and u/Kensethfan2 might prefer to expound at u/TheWayInternational, which I set up to be more friendly to such discussion.
Soon I'm going to post about Ignatius to Philadelphia as it gives a much different meaning of Jesus to Philadelphia than usually received here.
I don't give satan any credit, so in particular he has no power to stop the holographic message of the Bible from getting through despite chipping away at the pieces of the hologram.
Q didn't say satan controls the RCC, he quoted Vigano at length who describes the situation in great detail and very accurately as infiltration with hope for the invisible church to engage recovery soon.
I'll just note that u/Graphenium is the other Thomas reader here. Your Thomas quotes are not much different from the protocanon. There are some Thomas quotes that require better context work to understand.
I was just studying that Jesus is the Monogenerate Son, the only to be begotten in his way. We are natural sons by creation, and also adopted sons after our fall; we will be like him; he will always remain unique.
Since you quote Gen. 1:26, the original word for man is of course 'adam, which is both title and name. We, like Jesus, each have rights to be an 'adam. But everybody else has fallen short and must trust Jesus.
There's plenty of argument over the degree of "stain by sin" and other concepts. Pursuit of holiness is great if one doesn't get so proud as to think one isn't sinning when lots of others are seeing one is.
In short, I love holiness teaching. It must also remember: If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
US Flag Code (4 USC 1-10) requires that normal US flags meet the ordinary criterion, and if a decoration is not expected to get the same dignity as a US flag it should be clearly distinguishable, so bunting just contains stripes and stars in other nondescript patterns (8(d)). I'm particularly sensitive when people try to depict a US flag and have no idea how to get to 13 stripes and 50 stars (or any other valid configuration). It ain't easy! In fact, Trump just endorsed something with an invalid flag and star field in today's GAW feed. [Add: Here it is. Hulk Hogan is absolute legend, but his artists were a bit too lazy to get all the stars in (the stripes are correct).]
This configuration has not 77 stars but either 81 or 83 depending on how the top cut-off row is interpreted. Having rounded corners it's clearly intended as bunting with the number of stars being irrelevant; it's a rounded-rectangle background prop, not a flag. Speculation of US 52 and Canada 25 is totally unwarranted.
Obama once famously referred to campaigning in "57 states". The territories are states for some purposes and not for others, and their count varies depending on what purpose. The US currently claims 16 territories. I've never seen Canada counted as 25, it has 10 provinces and 3 territories.
Yes, someone has pointed out that, since the case was originally styled NIFLA v. Harris, Scotus has already ruled against Harris on the Constitutional merits once before.
This is pretty accurate, even though the AI commits total innumeracy by blithely converting 50% into 49.7% and 50.3%. My feel however is that the secular faction is underrepresented here and we should stick to about 10 Orthodox 10 Conservative 20 Reform. Those who "engage" the Talmud would then be maybe 15%, but those who have read every page are still in the vanishing fraction of maybe thousands out of 15 million.
Christians also regard the Hebrew-Greek Bible as so inspired and inerrant that they get the wrong idea that Jews regard the Talmud that way. Rather, Jews mostly regard the Talmud like Christians regard the patristics (church fathers): convenient and cultural but eminently forgettable. Jews should regard the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) as inspired and inerrant, but those fundamentalists that do so still have a lower view of it, on average, than fundamentalist Christians.
So the key is not to monolith the Jews into being hidebound observers of the thousands of dense pages of the Talmud. Jews are largely anti-creedal: the one-verse Shema is the only creed for many, and for those who insist on more we have the 13-point Yalkut, which is much less binding than even the apostles' creed. Nobody makes the Talmud an article of faith; it is to be understood primarily for its place in culture. If there is any article of faith in its halakhah, it by rule is always taken from somewhere in the Tanakh, which makes it just as easily nitpicked by Christians as by Jews. We should read the church's magisterium and understand its many ways to "get around" hard Scripture (Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox, etc.) before we go around criticizing the Talmud for the same.
Thanks John. Lotta work in your name that I respect. Here's to chime in a couple perspectives from c/Christianity, where we discuss these a lot.
I say the Bible is holographic, meaning that the whole of the message shines through even if you don't have much of it. For thousands of years nobody had "all" of it, only that which had been revealed so far. By the time the last was revealed the first had already received many textual variants. So nobody on earth has ever had "the whole Bible" consisting of all the autographs at once.
This means a little wrangling over nonessentials won't hurt us. Even if we limit ourselves to the verses undisputably in the 66 protocanonical books, we have all we need. If we add the dozens of (often repetitive) verses removed in the 19th century from the "common" Bible because of "higher scholarship" under Hort-Westcott provenance, we only have a couple extra windows on the basics. Yes, Jesus's statement about fasting was removed from Matt. 17:21 and in part from Mark 9:29, but nobody could remove "when ye fast" / "when thou fastest" from Matt. 6:16-17, nor could anyone remove the collective tradition of the connection from fasting to exorcism. If we add the (variously counted) deuterocanonical 7 books and 2 sections that were also lost in printing earlier in the 19th century, we don't add much, mostly conflicted narratives, but nothing that a single doctrine is drawn from. If we add the extra (maybe?) 14 books that the Orthodox count as deuteros but the Catholics don't as of the 17th century (but I think these were excluded in Trent in the 16th also), the same is true. The holographic Bible still prevails.
Besides the dozens of verses previously accepted by most all as protocanonical (just use KJV 1769 standard to solve this problem), in textual criticism I uncover several variant readings that nobody tells us about. Until recently nobody carried the variant Mark 16:9 "short ending", but it's profitable and well worth a footnote. There are a lot more such texts, but big publishers don't want to overload people with them when there are so many more familiar variants. Every time I find one like the short ending, I get a new clerestory view of one cultural detail not often taught; but I don't get any new doctrine. So these are just gleanings on the way but the Way itself is well-marked.
There are also a wealth of books that give great human history around the Bible that have never been received by the covenant people as God's Word. I love these and many church leaders recognize they're profitable to read if you treat them as human books. I'm partial to the Odes of Solomon, 1 Enoch, and lately Ignatius of Rome, and someday I'll make time for the Sibylline Oracles. The church often shies away from teaching about these books to protect against the risk of their misinterpretation, and this protectionism may be a bit too heavy, but those who run with false doctrine because of such books are certainly much heavier in their error.
Now let's speak Anne Frankly about the Jews, which is what got me banned at ConPro (looking for people to put in good words). I always say, feel free to criticize individual Jews, and feel free to cite demographic evidence, but don't blame the innocent of any people group along with the guilty. What you do here is to intimate rather than speak frankly, but that's unnecessary because all that people need here is to follow that rule. Don't say "the Catholics" do this, say inquisitor Matthieu Ory oversaw the condemnation of Servetus to death. Don't say "the Jews" do that, say Benito Garcia confessed to a ritual child murder in 1491 and was executed. The perceived right to stereotype is the whole problem, and the use of indirection to speak of these issues is just a symptom of it.
Of course a handful of Jewish leaders, supported by an astroturf mob of hundreds, called for Jesus's death, and invoked a hasty curse on themselves and their people. However, Acts 4-5 shows that many if not all of this mob became some of the first 5,000 Christians. So there's no "the Jews" there.
Of course no other books besides 66 of them rose over time to be received as the protocanonical Bible. Every one of these went through the ranks of the covenant people for hundreds of years until it was sufficiently tested to account it placement in the canon. Every other book the covenant people has reviewed has never risen to that level of success under the same scrutiny. They were never "deleted" from the protocanon, but there were always arguments about how much influence and range the deuterocanon should have. So there was no suppression of other books, there was just never the staying power and divine inspiration found in any other book that rose it to the level of protocanon. Rather, there was always a clear demarc between the protocanon and any other book not in it.
Of course child sacrifice goes very far back, but it's a perversion of the gospel of Gen. 3. God revealed that the seed (child) of the woman would be bruised for sin, and so the enemy twisted this into the gospel of personal affluence by seminal (self) destruction. Before Abraham, child sacrifice was rampant (leading to what historians call Canaanite collapse), but Abraham learned that there was a truer, older seed-of-woman model that transcended and shamed the corruption, and he participated in acting out the proof of this model. So the fact that the enemy corrupted Israel later with the same Nimrod doctrine that had always been so successful at cooption before in every other nation is not relevant for determining its origin.
In short, the enemy is spiritual, the demons and those they have captured (except as we plunder their hostages). We fight satanists, luciferians, defined by allegiance, not any people group defined by upbringing. Behind "it's the Jews" (allowing a little criticism of the Jews as cultivating a divide-and-conquer strategy as hinted by Ron Paul) is an even more rewarding proposition "it's the satanists". This also allows us to continue evangelizing those same Jews, of which about a million accept Jesus as Messiah.
Ayers sarcastically admitted writing Dreams From My Father.