its easy to burn coffee, with an old-school coffee pot.
this is why k-cups are such a hit. a quick, fresh brew, with no leftovers in the pot.
oh i just have to go to Target to get my rainbow colored tuck-friendly swim-wear for my 5 year old.
hey kid come here? are you 16 yet? you got a job? i tell you what. you get a job here, we will give you some money, AND pay to have your dick cut off by an actual surgeon. what do you say? is it a deal?
so basically there are the experienced coffee drinkers who just drink it black,
and then theres all these noobie coffee drinkers who are still using sugar and cream to sweeten their coffee and knock the bitter edge off.
the attribute the bud light boycott to him too
the existence of bisexuals implies homosexual activity is a choice, at least to some people.
bisexuality also implies there are only 2 sexes.
isn't it weird how theres a B for bisexual in LGBT, but yet we seldom actually hear from bisexuals?
because bisexual isn't inclusive enough,
they are thinking about updating it to try-sexual, as in, they will try anything
vaccines are witchcraft.
vaccines are idolatry.
vaccines are evil.
I've been monitoring the trans community chatter for 40 years... ask me anything
hyperlinks to rabbit holes please
sorry, archive link in OP is bad. try this one instead. i can't edit OP
There is no link between vaccinations and queerness, medical experts told Insider. Still, these claims continue to spread on Telegram among QAnon conspiracy theorists who cited comments from Tabrizian, whose field of medical advice is considered a threat by Iranian health officials.
"There is certainly evidence that shows unvaccinated children are more likely to catch things like measles, but there is no relationship between vaccines or not being vaccinated and being queer or transgender," Dr. David Verhoeven, an expert in virology and professor of Vet Microbiology & Preventive Medicine at Iowa State University, told Insider.
Medical experts say there is no link between vaccinations and queerness Some of the claims say that the COVID-19 vaccines turn children queer or trans by somehow activating a recessive "queer" or "trans" gene passed down by the parents.
According to Verhoeven, this theory is false for multiple reasons, the first being the vaccines don't integrate into human DNA at all and only activate the body's immune system against the coronavirus.
"The only thing within the body that the vaccine 'turns on' is the immune system," Verhoeven said. "Since there is no 'gay gene' anyways, there is no connection between getting vaccinated for COVID or any other pathogen and 'turning' queer or transgender."
While researchers have tried for decades to find a specific gene that makes a person queer or transgender, no such gene has ever been found.
The other portion of the theory asserts the combination of the vaccine coupled with soy products in our food supply would lead to more children being queer or trans.
Again, Verhoeven said there is no evidence to back these claims, as certain East Asian communities have historically eaten many soy products with no disproportionate rates of queer or trans people.
"If we can stop looking at being queer or gay as some defect or disease that needs to be cured or prevented and just be accepting of diversity, society would certainly benefit," Verhoeven told Insider.
The QAnon community has played a major role in spreading COVID-19 misinformation
so, when i originally copy-pasted this article, from its reader format, all of the advertisements were replaced by the word "advertisement", and it became pretty evident what the content-to-advert format would be. so we get about 5 paragraphs of content, and the an advertisement...
no worries, we understand they have a business model, and bills to pay.
and this business model actually favors getting people to talk longer, or to be able to quote more of whatever they say, because if they can get another 4 paragraphs of content, they can sell another advertisement.
but getting these people to say more, sometimes backfires, like when we actually take the time to scrutinize and critique what they say.
so this "expert", Dr. David Verhoeven, an expert in virology and professor of Vet Microbiology & Preventive Medicine at Iowa State University, says
"There is certainly evidence that shows unvaccinated children are more likely to catch things like measles, but there is no relationship between vaccines or not being vaccinated and being queer or transgender,"
and how exactly would Verhoeven even know that?
has he read all of the relevant literature?
can he explain why the claim of "not finding the evidence" is commonly cited as actual evidence?
does Verhoeven believe he can "prove a negative" with a study?
example: if i can't find my keys, does that somehow imply my keys don't exist? or does it actually imply i haven't looked in the right place yet?
can Verhoeven cite anyone in this history of the world who has successfully used a "study" to "find the evidence" that any vaccine causes any problem?
because while "not finding the evidence" might sound exciting for an ignorant newcomer,
"not finding the evidence" has become tedious and tiresome to everyone else. we are to the point where your announcement of "not finding the evidence" is interpreted as "we aren't even looking".
so therefore, we aren't even listening to you anymore.
Verhoeven goes on to say theres no gay gene, which should be obvious, as any gene that made a person gay, would not be likely to be passed down from generation to generation.
but the real tell is this paragraph here:
"The only thing within the body that the vaccine 'turns on' is the immune system," Verhoeven said. "Since there is no 'gay gene' anyways, there is no connection between getting vaccinated for COVID or any other pathogen and 'turning' queer or transgender."
he is straw-manning the argument.
he is deliberately misrepresenting the argument, and then arguing against that misrepresentation.
our actual argument is actually alluded to by Verhoeven, which is that it is the immune response that causes so many problems.
and if Verhoeven was interested in "finding the evidence", he might want to start by actually listening to the parents of vaccine-injured children.
but we all know Verhoeven will find every excuse in the book, to avoid exposing himself to ideas that are outside of his comfort zone.
Verhoeven will continue to bleat the mantra of peer reviewed synthetic data,
Verhoeven wil continue to have this kindergarten-level of understanding of how a vaccine works, like they inject you with a dead germ, and you have an immune response, and then your immune system knows what to do in future encounters.
while this model is useful for getting kindergartners to take their vaccines like a big boy...
its woefully inadequate in the clinical settings.
like, i would imagine that Verhoeven would see "redness and swelling" around the injection site, and still have his doubts that it was caused by vaccines.
and it is because people like Verhoeven are in a state of mind we call "denial", it is impossible to get thru to them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denialism
until Verhoeven can bring himself to admit that vaccines are capable of causing adverse reactions, he will forever be helpless to actually address the problems in any meaningful way.
for example, if Verhoeven is still in a state of denial about vaccines causing autism, how will he ever help to prevent even a single case of vaccine-induced autism?
the fact of the matter is, every vaccine causes an immune response to everything in the vaccine, not "just" the dead germs.
SV-40 the cancer virus is a good model for understanding how a single virus could spread to lots of people thru vaccine production methods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40
and so it is the human DNA in vaccines, that causes pretty much every so-called "auto-immune" disease or disorder.
this stem-cell human DNA contains all of the information that is needed to unfold into an adult human,
and even if this human DNA is broken down into smaller strands, and becomes random "trace amounts" of human DNA, your immune system will still respond.
and depending on which random fragments of human DNA your immune system encounters, will determine which "random" into-immune disease you get.
so here we have Verhoeven spinning the narrative about gay genes not existing, when the elephant in the room is auto-immune disorders.
think about this for a moment.
why on earth would your immune system just randomly wake-up some morning and decide to attack some random part of your body?
why do some women wake up with PCOS at age 16?
why would your immune system randomly attack your ovaries at age 16?
why is it, that if you go into a PCOS group at Facebook, and search for "vaccine", you will find numerous examples of girls and women saying that they started having symptoms of PCOS soon after a vaccine.
and i can hear Verhoeven now, reciting the 5 mantras of the vaccine injury denier, which are:
-
coincidence
-
correlation
-
conspiracy theory
-
temporal
-
anecdotal
i will say this... i once had a job where i was responsible to "sex" dogs, and usually the "sex" was very obvious, and un-ambiguous.
however, one day a litter of puppies came in, and while they were being "sexed", someone discovered a hermaphrodite puppy, which is to say it had the sex organs of both a male and a female.
and this was such an unusual and shocking discovery, that everyone stopped what they were doing and stood around gawking at this puppy, who was laying on his/her back on the exam table. we all got a good look, and everyone agreed that we were all seeing the same thing...
and it was a bit of an "ah-ha" moment for me, because i had vaguely heard of a hermaphrodite, but i had never actually seen one, or was even sure it if was a real thing or another urban legend.
so i will concede that is it biologically possible for someone to fall outside of the definitions of male and female.
however, when someones sex organs are fully intact and normal, there is less ambiguity,
like, if they were to do a medical exam of their body, it would be in every way a male or female,
and the only reason that "assignment" would come into doubt, is by the words coming out of their mouth, and the way the person presents themselves to the world.
Daniel Webster invented the dictionary to preserve the definitions of words, primarily the words in the Bible.
we need to steer more students into the skilled trades
this is the best thing i have seen all day.
came here so say this. its highly unusual that any dog would bite, and draw blood, more than 3 times and live to tell about it.
i like how they made Trump red, and Haley blue.
so first of all, they are openly admitting to practicing "gender-affirming care" on minors, something that they had previously denied.
in clown world, a person who is not old enough to give their informed-consent to other things like cigarettes, or tattoos... is somehow old enough to give their informed-consent to puberty blockers and "gender-affirming hormones"
i was surprised by the breakdown of the study participants.
A total of 104 adolescents and young adults aged 13 to 20 years participated in the study: 63 transmasculine, 27 transfeminine, 10 nonbinary or gender fluid, and 4 who either did not respond to the gender identity question or responded, “I don’t know.”
ill have to do some more digging, but if this breakdown is accurately representative of the numbers in the real world, it is showing us that the most common form of gender non-conformity is "transmasculine"
ChatGPT: Transmasculine is a term used to describe individuals who were assigned female at birth but identify and/or express themselves as masculine or male. This identity may or may not involve transitioning through medical interventions, social changes, or legal processes to align their gender expression and/or physical characteristics with their gender identity. Transmasculine individuals may identify as transgender, non-binary, genderqueer, or simply as men.
what could account for such a lopsided number of girls over boys?
my first impression is that its probably the CHO-PCOS model.
it is because CHO cells are the most commonly used cells in vaccine production, that PCOS is the most common endocrine problem in women.
it is because females have ovaries, and males don't,
that there are so many more "transmasculine" girls, than "transfeminine" boys.
i go into more detail in this post:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17sP1nxgHO/transgenderism-is-caused-by-vacc/c/
No link between receiving puberty blockers or gender-affirming hormones and anxiety were discovered.
i suspect this sentence is a typo, but the way the sentence came out seems revealing to me. its like they are preemptively trying to disprove any link between these treatments and increasing anxiety.
but the big question here is, why do these treatments seem to work?
maybe, just maybe if theres a pubescent girl who thinks she might be a boy, the answer is to give her more estrogen, not to give her more testosterone, or "T" in their trans sub-culture lingo.
it just seems to me that a lot of this "gender" stuff boils down to basic biology and evolution.
every other species has this "LOOK AT ME" presentation that they show to the world.
a big buck has a big rack.
a peacock has big feathers.
why do women put on make up?
because LOOK AT ME!
my nephew has a childhood friend who was born a boy, and is now "transfeminine"
or a TIM (trans-identifying male, considered derogatory)
maybe the reason the kids in those study got better, is because they felt they were being seen, and attended to.
imagine if you are a little boy, and you wake up in the morning and put on blue jeans, a tee-shirt, and tennis shoes, and go out for the day, and literally nobody comments on how nice you look...
now imagine that same boy wakes up in the morning, and DECIDES to change his "gender" or his outward presentation to the world.
he DECIDES to put on a dress, some make-up, and some high-heel shoes, and goes out for the day. and literally all day long, he is gawked at, and told he is STUNNING AND BRAVE.
now, in the future, which "GENDER" is this poor boy going to want to gravitate toward?
maybe we need to tell little boys who wear cowboy boots, cowboy hats and big belt buckles that they are STUNNING AND BRAVE?
so we already know that gender dysphoria is highly associated with Aspergers, which is now part of the autism spectrum of disorders.
but on the flip side of "gender dysphoria" is "gender euphoria"
"gender euphoria" is officially a "just a crazy, baseless conspiracy theory", which should be a big clue to dig deeper...
gender euphoria is the euphoric feeling that a person gets, when they are "seen" the way they want to be seen.
for example, if a boy wants to be "seen as" a girl, and so he dresses up like a girl, and then he gets a lot of "positive feedback" by presenting himself as a girl, he gets a feeling of euphoria, or near -orgasm
he "gets off on it".
and like many other vices and addictions, the more they get off on it, the more their life starts to revolve around it.
this is why trans people insist on 100% audience participation.
LOOK AT ME... THE WAY I WANT TO BE SEEN.
if only ONE person doesn't LOOK AT THEM, THE WAY THEY WANT TO BE SEEN, it shatters their illusion,
and thats mean, and hateful, and oppressive, you bigots...
so for example, the pronoun thing. every time you buy into the pronoun thing, by actively using someones "preferred pronouns", you are wittingly or unwittingly participating in their kink.
and if you understand what is going on, and refuse to participate in their wankery,
then you are transphobic, un-democratic, exclusionary, white nationalist, with a hint of nazi-fascist...
jerk me off with your eyes, bigot...
so anyway, my nephews friend has been wearing what i assume to be a stuffed bra,
and i can't help but wonder... who are the breasts for?
are they for him, so that when he looks down at his chest, he sees these big breasts?
are they for him, so that when he looks in a mirror, he sees these big breasts?
what goes on in his mind, when he's "putting on his gender" in the morning?
wow this stuffed bra look stunning and brave today!
actually, i think the stuffed bra is for other people,
namely the straight males who gawk at females.
"the male gaze" has been a known-thing for generations.
so he puts on this stuffed bra, to give the "presentation" of breasts,
or a nice rack, in deer parlance.
if you listen to girls and women talk about this subject, you would understand what i mean...
apparently, from a females perspective, there are lots of men who stare at women, just a little too long, they gawk at women, and make them feel uncomfortable, like they are about to become victimized in some way.
and honestly, i feel that women's feelings on this are justified, because most western women have been the victim of some sort of sex abuse, at some point in their life.
so if you were to ask a beautiful woman, "do men ever gawk at you?"
the women would say, "oh yes, every day!... its kinda creepy actually"...
and if you were to ask her, "and at what age were you, when men started gawking at you?"
the answer would shock you... it would be like at age 5 for example.
and its all ages of men.
"creepy old men, gawking at young girls"
but this is the experience of the beautiful people.
what about the vast majority of people who aren't beautiful, and don't get gawked at as much?
some of them like the attention.
they like being gawked at.
and if you dye your hair neon green, or bright blue, or purple, people will probably gawk at you,
why would they want people to gawk at them?
because LOOK AT ME.
validate my gender.
stare at my fake rack.
tell me I'm stunning and brave,
bigot.
Notice how he mentions autoimmune diseases.
so they have to serve the entire sentence before they can appeal?
Im going to keep repeating this point. If Trump was sentenced to prison, would he have to serve the sentence before he could appeal?
they are very upset with us because we don't subscribe to newspapers anymore, we don't pay a cable bill anymore, we don't watch TV anymore, and they really don't have a way to "reach" their target audiences with their propaganda.
we aren't even listening to them anymore
Always Has Been
a post i made a year ago,
A Crash Course In The Recent History Of The Vaccine Debate, By Paul Offit
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JndTYy6r/a-crash-course-in-the-recent-his/c/
ok gang, here's the plan.
if you are a boy, and theres a tampon dispenser in the boys room,
then buy all of the tampons, and put them in a nice basket, and deliver them to the girls room, perhaps with a nice sign that says they are free for anyone in need...
well the big change is in the language.
they used to call themselves "trans-sexual" and now they say "trans-gender"
they have honed their propaganda game, in the same way as the homosexual community did,
for example, "homo-phobia" morphed into "trans-phobia"
their attitudes seem to have gotten more confrontational and militant.
they have circle-jerked themselves into believing all of their various slogans, such as
"trans women are real women"
they legit see straight men as being "oppressive" by "excluding" them from their dating pool.
they are famous for saying things like,
"if you don't want to date any particular trans girl, that fine... but if you don't want to date any trans girls at all, you should really stop and think about your transphobia"
like, they just don't seem to understand or accept that straight men are straight, and will not spend a moment entertaining the idea of dating a trans girl, when theres actual women available. they want you to think about how being straight excuses them, and how that should make you feel bad for them.
they seem to have asserted themselves into women's spaces, where they appear to have the motivation of voyeurism.
one notable incident involved a TIM (trans identifying male) inviting himself to a breastfeeding support group, and rationalized his unwanted presence in this group, by saying he needed to experience this kind of thing, to truly be a woman.
i do believe it is a mental condition.
so much so that i would not willingly associate with any trans person, knowing that the trans aspect of their personality is just the tip of the iceberg of toxic and crazy that lurks beneath the surface.
i have read all sorts of rationales.
one guy knew he was a female because he liked certain textures, like silk, and velvet, and lace, and satin.
one of their trans mantras is that "gender is a social construct",
and then we have this boy here who has a texture fetish, that he assumes only a female would have.
the entire medical field has gone crazy, trying to accommodate the crazy.
they no longer say "pregnant women", they say "pregnant people" to be more inclusive toward all of the men who keep getting pregnant.
how do men get pregnant, you ask?
oh its easy. you start with a person who was "assigned to be a female at birth". then you convince her that she is actually a man. and if she gets pregnant, then you tell her that men get pregnant.
and, because its coming from a doctor, it sounds reasonable.
of course men can get pregnant.
what doctor is going to want to argue with a pregnant person who insists they are a man?
they don't get paid enough to deal with that kind of shit.
so there are 2 aspects that should be considered.
theres the first aspect, where you don't really feel like the sex you were assigned at birth,
and theres theres the other aspect, which is they actually do feel like the opposite sex.
the idea of "feeling like" the opposite sex, is as cringe as a white man thinking he is black.
like, it would literally be impossible for you to experience life as the opposite sex, or another race, and here you are "appropriating" that experience,
... because you feel like it?
... because you are living life as your so-called "true self"?
i have a current working hypothesis that the CHO cells they use to make vaccines, cause causing an epidemic of PCOS in women. and because PCOS attacks the ovaries, it causes all kinds of hormonal problems for these women, namely that they start exhibiting male characteristics, such as facial hair, and/or male pattern balding.
i think there is also some munchausen by proxy going on.
for example, i know a family that got weirdly excited at the prospect of their young son growing up to be gay, because he was playing with dolls or some other activity that was "social constructed" to be a stereotypical female activity.
thank God he recently announced he has a girlfriend.