4
WHOSkiddingWhO 4 points ago +4 / -0

OK.

26 Wall Street is a really historical building, but it was not the first Central Bank. Alexander Hamilton established the first Central Bank in Philadelphia in the 1700.

It was in the 1700s the City Hall of New York and then later after the revolution it was where Congress met. It became known as Federal Hall in George Washington was sworn in as president there. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Hall

Later in the 1800s we had a money system called an independent Treasury and this building became a subtreasury building. The system got managed by the FED after 1913

The Federal Reserve Bank replaced the Subtreasury system in 1920, and the Subtreasury office closed on December 7 of that year.[60] The Assay Office leased the Subtreasury building to the Fed, which was constructing a building of its own, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Building, two blocks north.[61] The Fed started moving its monetary holdings from the Subtreasury to the new Fed building in May 1924.[62]

Lower Manhattan is pretty interesting. When I used to work down there. I used to eat lunch occasionally at the place where George Washington said goodbye to his officers.

3
WHOSkiddingWhO 3 points ago +3 / -0

Most of Trump Tower is condo apartments owned by the condo residents. Like Trump owns his triplex.

What Trump owns is the retail space. And I think some commercial office space.

As of 2021, the building's official owner is GMAC Commercial Mortgage.

1
WHOSkiddingWhO 1 point ago +2 / -1

There's a Community Note on this video saying it's fake. This was from some other event.

And thinking about it, I think it's true for two reasons. It was not really known what time Trump would be traveling. So it seems unusual to be that many camera crews on the streets.

That also is not the way you get to Trump Tower from downtown.

You can see in the video it's on 5th avenue.

5th Ave is a one way street going South.

5th avenue runs from Trump Tower to the courthouse, not the other way around.

https://youtu.be/OJ19q-a5p4k?si=FDMFvcqUbi-KALxT

This video starts right above Trump Tower and goes south down to the NY public library

3
WHOSkiddingWhO 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't understand this at all.

He's a witness. It's his first hand account of what he witnessed. That is evidence.

Pecker has known Trump for years and he testified about a conversation he, Donald Trump and Cohen had.

What exactly would prevent him from taking the stand?

1
WHOSkiddingWhO 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you’re missing the point. The grand jury saw the redacted version;

What document are you talking about?

Because again, the main document I heard about was a motion to compel Discovery. It's not grand jury material. It was written by Trump's lawyers in 2024.

The redactions are for the public. Trump's lawyers know all this information because they were the ones who wrote the document before it was redacted. And since it was in 2024, it's not for the grand jury which finished on 2023.

The grand jury would have heard of heard from the actual witnesses.

the unredacted version makes it quite clear that Trump was cooperating with NARA.

Which would not be unusual for a document written by Trump's lawyers.

I'm sure Hunter Biden's lawyer said he didn't evade taxes.

1
WHOSkiddingWhO 1 point ago +1 / -0

It looks like

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ELN/17-152

§ 17-152. Conspiracy to promote or prevent election. Any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means and which conspiracy is acted upon by one or more of the parties thereto, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

1
WHOSkiddingWhO 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a document written by Trump's lawyers because this information was already turned over to them through discover.

They have this material and are using this material to prepare Trump's defense.

The redactions were about preventing people from being able to identify the witnesses. Trump's lawyers have the whole witness list

3
WHOSkiddingWhO 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the case Mike Lindell was so hopped up about.

Remember when he claimed he was going to the Supreme court

2
WHOSkiddingWhO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait, Gateway Pundit didn't mention this was Judge Engoron?

Wow, that is funny.

2
WHOSkiddingWhO 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was a compromise proposed by the NY AG.

See this thread.

https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1RQ9avY/x/c/4ZA2uZyLoZt

One of the changes was KSIC agreed to NY jurisdiction. KSIC is headquartered in CA, but they are incorporated in Delaware. And the parent company is in the Virgin Islands.

-1
WHOSkiddingWhO -1 points ago +1 / -2

This is false.

I saw this going around on Twitter, but it's false. They settled.

It was the NY AG's office that suggested how they could resolve the situation. Trump has to change several details of the bond and resubmit it.

I wrote a thread on this earlier today

https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1RQ9avY/x/c/4ZA2uZyLoZt

3
WHOSkiddingWhO 3 points ago +3 / -0

He has not. He hasn't ruled on that at all.

And this wasn't a pre-planned dental appointment for the juror. They came down with a toothache and then made the appointment.

Tomorrow has is also going to be a short day for testimony.

1
WHOSkiddingWhO 1 point ago +1 / -0

David Pecker publisher of the National Enquirer is the first witness. He is testifying now.

1
WHOSkiddingWhO 1 point ago +1 / -0

what would the fakery be?

He did this in front of a crowd. Lot's of people saw it and there would be no way to control who was on the street to see him do this. He was specifically was in the area for pro Trump protestors right before this this.

So how could it be faked? a magic trick?

2
WHOSkiddingWhO 2 points ago +2 / -0

it's over Andrew Amer says "the AG is fine with all these conditions stipulated on the record."

Judge accepts it, and court is adjourned.

2
WHOSkiddingWhO 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://x.com/rscharf_/status/1782430881329672249

AGREEMENT REACHED: Kise says they'll agree to maintain the Schwab account in cash and give Knight exclusive control of the account. Under a previous agreement, a Trump trust shared control. Seems like this will moot the AG's challenge to the bond.

2
WHOSkiddingWhO 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have taken a break to work out a settlement

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›