And there still hasn't been? What's your point?
Sure, but neither did Biden, no?
Believe me I am NOT defending this pedophile - I just see people with what appears to be a factually wrong sentiment in this comment section. Facts absolutely matter - there's plenty to hate circle-back Jan and the rest of Biden's admin for, but let's just get it right.
For sure - I'm aware of the technique used here, but I also see some people in the comments acting as if the inverse of this statement is true as well.
They're absolutely pro lockdown so that's for sure a lie, but is it also not a true statement that most lockdowns happened before Trump left office?
That's unacceptable. ALL firearm restrictions are an infringement of our God Given Rights.
If she's pregnant, why are you giving her any drugs at all? Unless she's a fat fuck she'll probably be absolutely fine, especially given, "omnicron."
I think his point is pretty clear. The number 17 is a naturally occurring number outside of Q, and not every single freaking instance of 17 or the letter Q is a Q proof.
Some people take the smallest things and turn them into massive theories. There's nothing wrong with researching theories and making propositions, but some people treat every single thing that could possibly be related to Q and try to force it to be true.
If you have to force something to be true, it's probably not true. Take clot shots as a primary example of this.
Haiku's have been around for a lot longer than Q has.
If we're timefagging, it's always traditionally been based from EST.
Yep, I agree.
How about constitutional exemptions?
They're still requiring it for healtcare workers. How could it possibly be consistent with that theory?
They didn't uphold that at all - they didn't rule on that. It's an entirely separate case.
You could definitely go higher if you so desired, but of course that's your choice.
I honestly find the horse versions to be easier to use, because it's easier than taking so many stupid pills every day. I don't get why most forms of ivermectin come in 3mg tablets.
I'm about 2 minutes into reading this, and this is the biggest joke of science I've ever read. Here's a quote from the PDF:
What if you could very easily add that oxygen to water and consume it directly? Well, Mother Nature beat you to it. Did you know that hydrogen peroxide is simply oxygenated water?
The notion that you can tack on an extra oxygen atom to water and call it oxygenated water is at best disingenuous and at worse just atrociously bad levels of an understanding of fundamental chemistry. It's an entirely separate compound from water, and is toxic to most of our cells. You can't just straight up drink significant quantities of it like you can with water. Oxygenated water is absolutely a thing, and it's called water with actual air in it - not a completely different chemical compound.
All of this, right after the author instructs the reader through two pointless, "experiments" related to breathing - failing to mention whatsoever the importance that carbon dioxide plays into the related actions of breathing. For example, it's entirely possible to have oxygen in your body, but it can be unusable without sufficient carbon dioxide present and accessible as well.
He continues:
Low grade pharmacy/grocery store hydrogen peroxide is well-known to most people. When we apply it externally to an open wound, hydrogen peroxide produces a bubbling sensation, which is just the extra oxygen being released.
That's a joke. This entire thing reads straight like a scam, and the web design plus the fact that they sell hydrogen peroxide would encourage that. Applying hydrogen peroxide to open wounds tremendously slows the healing process, as it kills, slows, and destroys your bodies' attempt to seal and heal the wound. An oxidizer mixing with blood would obviously result in this outcome to anyone who knows the first thing about chemistry...
I don't claim to be a chemist, and I don't claim to say that hydrogen peroxide is or isn't useful in any number of applications - I'm just saying that as a source this is pathetic.
I only know that we were prescribed the same dose for prophylaxis and therapeutics with only an increase in frequency, by a doctor.
If you increase the frequency over the course of a day while keeping the individual dosage the same, you are increasing the total dosage.
It's just a different way of doing the same thing. You could argue if it's more or less effective but that's a bit beyond my level.
Another thing to note is that Ivermectin is a drug that you want to take after a meal or at least some fatty food, you'll have better absorption/application of the drug.
It'll certainly help regardless of the dosage, but if someone has a serious case due to bad health to start with, they definitely don't need to be underdosing.
It's basic 5th-6th grade math. You have everything you need in the OP if you just want to follow their dosing levels.
There's no reason not to increase the dosage. This is one of the safest drugs out there, period.
.4 mg per kg of body weight has been standard for when you are actually sick, .2 mg per kg is regarded as preventative.
It's absolutely crazy how stupid people are. I have seriously low expectations for people's intelligence and they find new ways to one up me every time.
It's like the quote about UI design and whatnot - where no matter how idiot proof you make something, there will always be a dumber idiot.
What relation does Jan 13th have with Feb 21st? Am I just overlooking something obvious here, or are we making a massive leap?
Don't do it for us - Do it for The Lord. He has a plan for you, and I doubt it's limited to, "doing it for us."
The timer is just a cheap timer - it's job is likely to connect some contact pads, allowing for other electronics to complete the circuit responsible for causing the boom device to go boom.
Granted, I have zero experience with this, but that's how I'd imagine it could be used.
Just an FYI, you should be really careful posting things like this. I have no idea if EXIF data is stripped on this website for uploads or not, but sometimes that can be telling. For example, it could list the model of your phone, in addition to location (location may not be relevant here, but that's not the point).
Furthermore, you're quite a unique outfit, especially with your human in the red coat with flag, and notable braided hair. If someone wanted to, they could probably obtain your face from other pictures and video footage from that day.
Please don't misunderstand, I am in no way attacking you or threatening you, etc. I am merely trying to remind you to be careful in your online presence at all times.
Acting as if predictions about Q have nothing to do with Q is quite coy.
If the two were unrelated, then you are claiming that this place has nothing to do with Q.
It was circulated as a possibility, but many others told people not to put stake in it as there was no Q source that confirmed any of these theories.
Sure, I didn't mean to imply this place as a hivemind. There were definitely people who thought that something was CERTAIN on March 4th, and those who warned against such thoughts.
"Kids have a survival rate of 99.98%"
Bruh that's much closer to the ALL age survival rate than it is to the one for kids...