2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

wow thanks for sharing

2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think those are all really good questions.

I think, whatever the Q phenomenon was, it got the ball rolling for a lot of people. Trump's presidency and Q's posts have exponentially increased the number of people seeking alternative sources of information.

It's important that we don't get overly fixated on Q/Q + , Trump, or the "plan." Putting all our eggs in that basket. We have to use discernment with everything we read, with all sources of information that we encounter. Whether that be the mainstream media, Trump, Q, Q+, Alex Jones, David Icke, Ron Desantis, Bill Cooper, etc. Interestingly, Q has helped so many of us realize it must be this way,

2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't really say. I don't think any of us know why for sure.

Honestly, looking at his response in the Candace Owens interview, I don't really see anything that could be identified as veiled language. In other words, there's no coded speech, double entendres as it were. He appears genuinely proud of the vax.

For me, this shows we cannot be reliant on any one guy, or even any one "plan." Even though Trump has a lot of good qualities, I think you'd have to say he's mistaken on vaccines.

He leaves little room for reading between the lines in his Candace Owens interview. To extrapolate some ulterior motive is just too flimsy in my opinion.

What's going on (with COVID and beyond) is so much greater than any one person -- including President Trump.

5
formerdemfortrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hahaha yes. either that or Nine Scalias

Or 5 Thomas's and 4 Scalias

5
formerdemfortrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Many of us had hunch that the politicians and bureaucrats in certain states that implemented the horrific nursing home policies knew that their plans were harmful. And if you thought that but wanted more evidence — here it is.

How could the people telling us that we could catch the virus and die from a quick trip to the supermarket, be the same people that directed COVID patients into the living spaces of the very elderly— the people most at risk of dying from the virus.

Either these people are completely inept (dim-witted even) or they knew what they were doing. The actions of the Admiral Fruitcake, make it seem like the latter option is the case.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump used it from time to time when addressing the crowds. I kinda liked when he used that expression to be honest. Biden is generally tedious to listen to, so expressions he uses tend to get tired-out fast. But I don't mind "folks" personally.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

The loss of taste and smell is one reason I tend to think COVID-19 cannot be seen as identical with influenza. The loss of taste, especially. I know that is a symptom of flu as well, but I think in that case it seems to be because of plugged sinuses/mucus buildup. I know someone who got COVID who couldn’t taste for, no joke, over a year. And it wasn’t because of plugged sinuses. It was very strange.

When I got the virus, I don’t how to describe it, but it just had a different “feel” to it than when I’ve gotten the flu. My case was extremely mild, but just felt different.

by gamepwn
1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Echoing some other posts on this thread: I don't see how there could be a plan given all that we are seeing.

Not believing in a plan does NOT mean one has to stop researching the globalists plots, spreading the word on the evils of Marxism/Communism, protecting yourself and your family.

There have been dissident researchers (of all stripes) before the Q movement, and this struggle will continue with or without Q's plan.

Among the young, there needs to be MASS non-compliance with the vaccine mandates. We need more protests like we are seeing in Europe. We need to start talking in terms of the formation of communes of like-minded individuals.

Dissident researchers must, in my opinion, always utilize critical thinking; we must constantly expand our knowledge and widen our horizons. I understand this .win can ban people for being "doomers," but I think that this move is in conflict with the spirit of the best dissident/conspiracy research. Follow where the evidence leads you.

What's wrong with being skeptical of a supposed plan? Maybe there are other approaches to understanding Globalism/the Cabal that should be taken into account other than what have now become the standard views in the Q movement.

I admire and care about the users in this community. I wish you all the best. But I think something more is needed than "trusting a plan" at this point.

by gamepwn
2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with you that this needs to be said. Sometimes it seems like this .win has become a big Trump rally, albeit a Trump rally consisting of people with views "off the beaten track."

At this point, I really don't understand what benefit one has in trusting "the plan." The fact that one is highly skeptical about a plan or a storm, does not mean that one has to trust mainstream narratives. Far from the truth. I wonder if putting trust in a hypothetical plan has actually delayed people's decision making on some fronts (Questions like : do I need to start applying to jobs where I can avoid the vax? Do I need to move to a state "friendlier" to the unvaxxed? etc.)

I'm sad to read that you are stuck in a situation like that, given how close you are to retirement. We are all really stuck in a very shitty situation.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me too hoping for the best. What comes next? What’s the next concrete development to look out for? I’m a little lost on that score.

2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's good to know. And a lot to take in. I'd imagine level of exposure would affect how much the ingested spike proteins harm the unvaccinated. I'd imagine it would not be as a severe a situation as actually taking the shot, but that might just be wishful thinking on my part. I really hope it's not the same severity; none of us will be able to completely segregate ourselves from the vaccinated.

2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone knowledgeable of biology answer me this:

Can an unvaccinated person “pick up” the spike proteins of an unvaccinated person through spit droplets ( talking in close proximity, sharing drinks, kissing, etc.) or would that only factor in such an instance as a blood transfusion?

2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

you should find a good amount on bitchute.com. Search for Ultimate 9/11 Redpill part II

4
formerdemfortrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

That seems about right.

I tend to think Mossad and CIA were the primary movers.

Bushes let it happen and maybe even contributed. Cheney got what he wanted in terms of oil/petrodollar (the international banks may have benefited from this angle as well).

Israel got America involved in never-ending wars.

Poppy Bush was able to implement a police-state

And there could have been a House of Saud connection, though I have not researched this aspect enough.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it says that powers that be would rather not have him in a trial for fear that the other players are not uncovered.

2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

The quality of comments on this .win has definitely gone down hill. Back during the election aftermath, there were so many interesting folks who were posting in the comments sharing really unique perspectives.

I guess ebbs and flows are only natural.

2
formerdemfortrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure what he means entirely but I believe that in the VAERS system if one dies within 14 days of getting a jab it’s much more likely to be counted as a vaccine death. But if it’s outside/after the initial 14 day period, it will likely not be counted as a vaccine-caused death — even if that is the most likely explanation.

I’ve read that a few places. I’ll try to find a link.

1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes exactly. He should speak out against passports and mandates at the very least.

by gamepwn
1
formerdemfortrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

like the idea. maybe notovax.win?

view more: Next ›