The question is: did his defection ever result in any info coming out? He was supposed to be similar to the American DNI and the thought was that he would provide certain info, which I guess is being kept classified, if nothing ever came out.
Ask him why he thinks doing something that didn't work a fourth time would have better results than doing something that didn't work the third time?
People like them usually like Einstein, who actually did have a good quote when he made that remark of doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
That said, don't try to overwhelm him with far out sounding claims, stick to authoritative sources that simply conjecture that the shots don't work, were pushed without sufficient efficacy evidence for monetary gain, and might be dangerous -- leave the far out stuff for once they start to see a bit of the truth.
Interesting. I've heard some things about the Mormon hierarchy and those admitted to temples that definitely goes with what you say. I also don't doubt that a mason would externalize some of their teaching, as they do tend to do that in a encoded way usually, and there does seem to be layers of initiation within the Mormon hierarchy itself.
That cycle is interesting, isn't it? Happened to Ghengis Khan, all throughout the Israelite days of old, Rome, etc ... Now we see it firsthand. Hopefully it turns out better for us than it has for some of the others. In order for that to be the case we will definitely need to enter an age of miracles.
Yeah, I think one of the most profound themes throughout the Bible is not only the focus on truth (and the fact that it is hated), but also the fact that you see an intentional inversion of all the things that are positive and good according to the God of the Bible in today's world. Those were some of the first realizations that took me in that direction and they are definitely scary parallels that are at work all over today. Sometimes these inversions by powerful entities and the outright contempt that is pushed and accepted for only one belief system (Christianity and beliefs that stem from it) are the things that most reenforce the truth of the Bible, as these are different iterations of the same power structures Jesus taught against way back in the day.
That said, good talking to ya!
That said, the movie's claims about banking and 9/11 are pretty accurate. Which is why I said the religion part of the movie is false -- not because it "hurt my feelings" or whatever, but because the claims have been completely demolished and proven to be garbage for over a decade.
You made a lot of assumptions there that I'm not even going to bother to address. What I said was fact and it seems like it's you who has a problem with the fact that Zeitgeist is based off the work of Acharya S who seemingly plagiarized some of Helena Blavatsky's new age nonsense and passed it off as fact when it wasn't.
Like I said, winter solstice has nothing to do with Jesus' birth. Mithras was never claimed to have been born from a virgin, he emerged from a rock... On and on.
However, it's from studying other religions that you can see that the paganism of the time was influential (through Roman and Catholic control of the teachings in those early years) on the practices of Christianity today -- that's not to say they influenced the Bible, since all of these practices were later added by man.
I was an atheist before I became a Christian, so another one of your assumptions was wrong. I don't have time to address all your claims, but the movie itself is a new age movie that intentionally, not by accident, teaches and refutes a false Christianity (why is there only one religion this is ever done with?) Further, it uses false truths to refute this false Christianity.
I assume you're interested in truth, since you're here. If so, put your faith to the test. I've seen what Zeitgeist claims, how about you see how easy it is to tear apart: https://youtu.be/30AunYXtYDg
Zeitgeist is BS when it comes to the religion part. It's to discredit Christ and lead you into new age.
In Christianity, Christ is never said to have been born on or near the winter solstice. That came from incorporating early sun worship with catholicism, which itself is steeped with sun worship at the higher levels.
Further, Easter is not a Christian term for the time of Passover, which marked the new year according to the Israelite calendar and the highest of their holidays. They observed a lunar calendar. Easter is likely named Easter because of Ishtar, who was heavily worshipped by some of the pagan cultures and sun worshipping sects within the Catholic church of that time.
There are a variety of zeitgeist "proofs" which are all based off of falsehoods from Acharya S, a new ager tied to luciferians like Blavatsky.
That said, the best method has always been to include enough truth to sound convincing and then to distort it into the direction you with the audience to go.
Aerial footage shows what looks like directional shrapnel spray, so the thing may actually have been blown up lol. Could have been they used trucks and pulled it out that direction though, but there was a scattering of smaller stones so I don't know
I always knew I had a high IQ, for whatever that's worth, but this whole thing has taught me that wisdom/understanding is really more about a) having discernment b) being capable of not following the herd c) not being easily hypnotized.
Most of what we see is a function of zero discernment, going along with artificially boosted beliefs or having been put into a hypnotic-like, non-thinking state by media.
Intelligence has some to do with it, but it definitely isn't everything.
I read it a long time ago too. It shouldn't be difficult to forecast something like that off of the vague trends of recent history. For them to change it that drastically meant they had reason to expect something significant to change.
They gave a lame explanation of economy and migration at the time but nobody bought it.
How long til orders are ignored? The enforcers of these political morons act against their own benefit and the benefit of the citizens in order to appease these tyrants who are making their way of life worse.
It's hard to believe, but I guess that's herd mentality.
Are they issuing opinions tomorrow? If so, would the decision on a Friday be the perfect set up for a bunch of summer of love bs occuring over the weekend?
Who knows, I don't plan to be around any of it anyways. Hoping for the right decision to come out soon, either way.
I think he's very honest too, though I do think he's prone to hysteria a bit. He seems like a good dude but he is all the way in the prepper world... To the point where shtf is always on the horizon.
That said, one day he'll probably be right, because it does seem inevitable that things continue to get worse.
Yeah, the fact that the news was repeatedly saying they thought another building would soon collapse when it sustained no impact should obviously make it MORE conspiratorial, not less lol