5
people_who_annoy_you 5 points ago +5 / -0

That’s huge actually, that Fox is reporting on that, even if it is only one part of a larger picture. Feeding us all drugs en masse accomplishes many of their goals at once while at the same time ripening us for further exploitation by them.

For one example, why is it that all of these shooters not only take similar rx drugs but were also groomed by the feds first? It’s because folks taking those drugs are more often the ones susceptible to fed-intervention in their lives and manipulation to do specific events. A complicit and malleable population, more easily accomplished through the mass use of their rx psychoactive drugs.

I thought Fox is sponsored by Pfizer as well?

2
people_who_annoy_you 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is always a possibility. It’s a possibility here equally as much. How do you know me commenting today isn’t hackers or rogue admins who have hijacked my account commenting tomorrow?

I wish Q would have released a public key they own, and occasionally signed messages as needed.

5
people_who_annoy_you 5 points ago +5 / -0

What the video shows is not a exploit, they literally modified the source code of the website and even explained that only server admin (codemonkeyZ and friends) can do this

10
people_who_annoy_you 10 points ago +10 / -0

“Kashyap Patel - name to remember.” Q

5
people_who_annoy_you 5 points ago +5 / -0

That was never a thing anybody really said before this year and the last

2
people_who_annoy_you 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t think that’s the Federal Reserve. Where did you find the picture?

edit: found the source: https://twitter.com/paintwithalex/status/1512517814636089344

And Alex Schaefer is the artist

edit again: It’s the Federal Reserve of San Francisco

1
people_who_annoy_you 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump called him Adam Schitt in 2018 I would add the screenshot of his tweet but I’m on mobile.. it’s listed on the q posts website though

2
people_who_annoy_you 2 points ago +4 / -2

This just seems unproductive and far off to me. Not worth the thought. Time travel, really? You’d think there would be plenty of better times to travel to than the present

1
people_who_annoy_you 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very true. Very true.. I guess it’s not very realistic. Not even positive what we’d do with the information we get from sitting there anyway..

15
people_who_annoy_you 15 points ago +16 / -1

That would be the ideal situation. But obviously that doesn’t appear to be in the cards yet.

I think a grassroots movement to monitor drop boxes and maintain surveillance video of each of them would be both reasonable and epic.

1
people_who_annoy_you 1 point ago +1 / -0

In this context, "compliance" is short for "regulatory compliance", which is a good thing...

The covid jabs have basically been omitted from having to take part in regulatory compliance.

1
people_who_annoy_you 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just a common courtesy to cite your sources brotha. Not sure where you get off.

You sure seem full of yourself for seeing somebody else’s post with a PDF link, whether here or elsewhere, scrolling to page 12, taking a screenshot, and making another post with that screenshot and a vague title. Really good job. Optimal research.

You were not the first to discover that NTI document.

Thanks anyway though. You’re on the right side but you’re too focused on points and bullshit. Focus on the goal. Cite your sources.

2
people_who_annoy_you 2 points ago +2 / -0

???

You posted a screenshot with a vague title. I can do research but to make such a crappy post is to shit where you eat.

Maybe next time just put the document in the first comment and say “this was from page 10”.

Thank you for responding to me and posting original NTI source anyhow.

by Qanaut
1
people_who_annoy_you 1 point ago +1 / -0

Truth me frens

@people_who_truth_you on TS

0
people_who_annoy_you 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's also very possible this video/"stream" has computer aided graphic effects, as we already know they use when reporting the "news" because they've been caught red-handed on many occasions.

0
people_who_annoy_you 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's also very possible this "stream" has computer aided graphic effects, as we already know they use when reporting the "news" because they've been caught red-handed on many occasions.

1
people_who_annoy_you 1 point ago +1 / -0

You didn’t even state facts. You stated ambiguous discussion points. Since you aren’t open to discussion and you just post the same copypasta over and over, I won’t be replying to you anymore. You’ve thoroughly demonstrated the extent of your uselessness. I hope you do figure out how to better invest your time and learn things and think critically, and not purposefully spend your time acting in bad faith.

Best of luck to you

1
people_who_annoy_you 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well when I tried to discuss these points with you, you incoherently started blabbering about “you’re so triggered!” like some kind of retard.

If you’d like to discuss the points you’ve stated the ball’s in your court. But like I said I take you for the bad faith type and you’ve already demonstrated that.

view more: Next ›