I kind of feel like it was staged.
Dude didn't you see the tweet? Then the retweet? Then the screencap? That's triple confirmed.
But it's got a Russian insignia!
Zero backup I'm seeing... Not even a "rumor says."
Ok, thanks. I'd still consider it a loose fit even given that info.
For the great awakening, the community. How does this fit?
Why is this here?
Can I see the ArmA footage?
It's almost like the inventor of the PCR test said EXACTLY the same thing over a year ago.
All other and newer videos are comment locked.
Let me just print some more money. Brrrr.... You now owe 3x more taxes, but here is your 6mo leased tesla.
Psaki's white house video still has unlocked comments.....
Those documents don't explicitly say location, but there is little reason to believe they wouldn't be.
I mean... they admitted they were doing this. It's not a secret.
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/diseases-conditions/coronavirus-bat-research
Socially socialist = socialist. Fiscally socialist = socialist. Socially and fiscally socialist = socialist. End.
It's in their name. Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. National Socialist German Workers' Party. You're trying to split hairs for some reason, I don't know why. They were socialist, regardless of your definition of "socialist."
I sort of agree. The largest thing I disagree with the Libertarians about is open borders; a country without borders is not a country. That's pretty cornerstone to at least the official party platform.
I'm not fiscally socialist and I don't really care what they would have thought of current "socialists."
I was a Nazi since I said "Trump isn't that bad." But in reality, I could never be a Nazi, since I'm not in favor of the socialist agenda. It's just a name they use because of ignorance.
When it's not a Photoshop, let me know.
This is so false. You can't just "make $10 million dollar art" as she states at about the 2 minute mark. After that she goes on to say that appraisers are in on it, which would absolutely hurt their value (livelihood) if they did this more than once. She also says that you need to market this person. None of this is guaranteed to produce any sort of value. There is no reason an artist, or their group of friends couldn't try this same on their own. She goes on to say that this scam would cost ~$250k, what if it doesn't work? Do you talk about how much they lost on previous endeavors, trying to hype up artists that never stuck? That no one ever talked about again after spending that money? No, of course not. This is an advertising and marketing exercise. It contains as much risk as it does reward. It's the exact same thing that Bugatti does. Their cars are not worth $2.5m they sell for, it's about status and word of mouth. For this to work, you need people to talk about the artist, or even like the artist, that's not guaranteed at all. The jumps this woman makes are fictional for the most part. She's probably just salty no one wants to do this with her shit art.
* I was partially wrong about her shit art guess, she also hates rich people.
Sure, my comment is a bit flippant, but a journalist should know better to make such an explosive claim without any proof. It would be impossible to say the man himself doesn't have a biased history, despite his often accurate accredited work. Asking for evidence, is not out of line.
Source: Trust the random Twitter bro.
Whores everywhere now!
This is one of the best posts I've seen on this /c.