1
suleo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Union did that with germans in 1862-3, so there is even precedent in this country!

3
suleo 3 points ago +5 / -2

Will it be before the sun goes nova, or after?

Just saying. Monitoring a REPEATED crime multiple times and letting it go unpunished makes you complicit at some point.

2
suleo 2 points ago +2 / -0

yea let's be clear, this isn't the result of 'democracy'. It's the result of the East India Company (US 'military') bringing 'democracy' to those savages. And taking their stuff as payment for services rendered.

14
suleo 14 points ago +14 / -0

The best part is the 'proprietary code' used in them.

Because addition is so complex and oh so super secret that the code needs to be locked down so that competitors won't steal the trade secrets!

Or maybe the machines do more than just adding.

4
suleo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I feel sorry for the HEALERS whose mission is to heal. They have to go through lots of hoops of this corrupted shit-system.

But the 'doctors', i.e. drug pushers? I also feel sorry for them, but in a different way. They willingly chose the path of evil. They will reap the consequences.

4
suleo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Go to Miami. Try to get any construction/house work/handiwork/anything manual without knowing spanish.

Good luck.

Not just illegals by the way. Lots and lots of 'legals' from south america. With honestly earned, or not-so-honestly-earned money. Their countries are unstable, so they take (some of) their stuff and come to FL.

5
suleo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where does the Eastern Roman Empire, the continuation of Constantine, based in Constantinople, and surviving (and sometimes thriving), for 1000 years after the fall of the city of Rome stand into all this?

That part of the empire DID NOT subject itself to the 'authority' of the guy with the funny white hat. Not at all in fact.

There's another part of 'the church' that you completely ignore. The eastern part. Very little to do with the western part.

They also fought the Khazarians, the Arabs, christianized the Russians & the slavs, held the Muslims at bay for a long time and eventually succumbed first to the crusades (one of the actual purposes of those things in fact), and then to the turks.

A 1000+ year, VERY powerful state entity is completely ignored in your narration of events. They need to fit into the story somehow. They have been intentionally brushed aside by the 'western' version of history, but that is obviously by design.

7
suleo 7 points ago +8 / -1

Some slight disagreement with you here fren, as to the timeline of events.

  • Western Rome (where the actual city was) 'fell' (i.e. ceased to exist as a state entity) with the sack of Rome around 479 AD.
  • Eastern Rome continued for ~1000 after Western Rome fell.
  • After the sack of Rome by the goths and eventual restoration of some rule, the pope started his shenanigans about being some sort of secular ruler. This pissed off the Eastern Roman Emperor (which represented actual Roman authority at that time, whatever that meant anyway). There was some uneasy peace between them but a growing rift that culminated in the Schism of 1054.
  • "Holy Roman Empire" was a germanic construct, that took place at least 600 years AFTER the fall of Rome (the city). It was neither holy (lol), nor Roman (it was basically the proto-german state), nor an empire (it was a federation of german and german-adjacent principalities & city states).

The gist of your message I agree with, but there was no immediate transition from Roman Eagles to "Holy Roman Empire" via the funny guy with the white hat. It was a lot more nuanced than that.

2
suleo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, the US army is helping/facilitating the invasion so...I guess it counts?

2
suleo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fren, I time-bounded it to people still alive today :).

This is why I mentioned the pacific theater.

The last actual attack was in 1941. The last actual occupation was in the 'civil' war.

No, the 9/11 false flag doesn't count as an 'attack'. Pearl Harbor, while clearly manipulated & known, was an actual organized attack by a state actor, with actual soldiers involved, i.e. the kind of thing that you end up with a desire of 'defending your country'.

12
suleo 12 points ago +12 / -0

More specifically, did israel, to who the US sends at least 8B PER YEAR of 'aid', refuse the aid that year?

I seem to remember some dancing dudes instead.

12
suleo 12 points ago +12 / -0

When was this country last attacked and in actual threat of occupation?

Like really, really attacked? Not "gulf of tonkin" attacked. Not "we have to fight them there, so that we don't fight them here". Not "we are spreading democracy", but really, really, actually...attacked.

And no, 'guarding' the fulda gap doesn't count either, sorry.

Once you answer this question, you'll have your answer as to whether you were at any point 'fighting for your country'.

The ones that actually did are either dead or hitting 90+. And only the ones that fought in the pacific theater.

3
suleo 3 points ago +3 / -0

which is funny because they also wrote it.

But it doesn't apply to them. It's for us.

2
suleo 2 points ago +2 / -0

For the same reason they are in Syria.

'terrorism'.

2
suleo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, the real issue is allowing Vindman & his ilk ('ukrainian' khazarian 5th columnists) into the "once great" (maybe not really, too much propaganda) US army.

The ukrainization/nazification/khazarification of the US army is now evident. It was only a matter of time.

And they LOVE using 'evangelicals' and other naive people as their cannon fodder (i.e. the ones actually doing the dying, unless you think Vindmann and any -mann is going to go catch bullets, nope). Problem is, they went too far, the evangelicals are now thinking twice about joining the US east india company. So expect them to recruit hordes of illegals next.

That's what the late romans did.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›