1
wideawakeuk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or if she read her own obit and hopped it.

2
wideawakeuk 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of the old (v old) Nokias, I used to have one of the JCB shockproof phones, that really did knock nails in. Coverage isn't great, but that's more a 'need to change network' issue than anything else.

3
wideawakeuk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can't beat a brick phone. Never upgraded myself. Oh, and short of anything else they will knock a nail into a wall pretty well.

3
wideawakeuk 3 points ago +3 / -0

A pleasure fren, well deserved! I think you are right, yuuge bigly things on the horizon, exciting times!

3
wideawakeuk 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like this, the frog species flip decode is great. Nice catch fren!

It's got a 'full circle' feel about it, as so many things do recently.

10
wideawakeuk 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm not so fond of NIH or FDA stuff currently. Both have spent time trying to kill us.

2
wideawakeuk 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Midgard serpent, Jörmungandr:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%B6rmungandr

The original ouroboros. Let's not let it eat too much of itself and squeeze us to Ragnarök.

2
wideawakeuk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kek, always doing that..

They tend to select very aesthetically pleasing people to converse with, no?

2
wideawakeuk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wondered why Edinburgh castle closed for high winds.. good storage? Or the no fly zone around Windsor- stop busy bodies peeking?

The other numbers thought I had was to do with Rosicrucians- they seem to put significance in 53 and 106 (53 + 53), often shortened to 16. Eliz II Coronation '53 (I think they waited from '52, her father's death) and IIRC there could have been some 16's in your previous decodes. Just a random thought, no idea if they've ever been connected to the royals.

https://amallulla.com/bacon/ (inc Amundson, guy that did the Bacon/Shakespeare decode)

1
wideawakeuk 1 point ago +2 / -1

I did, brushed the cobwebs off it and rolled it out for a whirl. You like?

4
wideawakeuk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, they've had it drip feeding in the UK news cycle for a bit, definitely soft disclosure going on. A 'false announcement' by the army a while back too IIRC (that might have been a threat though). They're currently talking of Kate as a future Queen, the media seem to know something is up and are covering all bases possible. The scandals are dropping hot at the moment, she's likely the cleanest option on the horizon.

https://archive.fo/wip/wNtiL

Just lining up the numbers perhaps?

1
wideawakeuk 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lots of that ilk here if interested fren, odd site but very dasting.

http://www.human-resonance.org/

4
wideawakeuk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe a part of the pattern, maybe an inopportune moment for a pic! I'll have a better look in the morning for patterns in the dateline (woke up this morning with laptop on face, mustn't do it again...)

4
wideawakeuk 4 points ago +4 / -0

ThanQ fren, it's a work in progress, I haven't been able to match appearances or dates yet- a little more in comment above^.

5
wideawakeuk 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's a bit of a guess fren.. Her initials have been bothering me for a bit, could be it, I'll keep thinking though.

Have you seen younger pics of her? Could be a natural process (I'm not great at spotting facial differences), but these 3 pics look different to me, all of them!

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/9Xi2yboQ6MDC29HVgAhbCh-768-80.jpg

There's loads of her partying when younger, could've been dangled as bait, honey trap style.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›