3
OSS_1 3 points ago +5 / -2

https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2012/10/12/diary-of-an-israeli-shill/

Diary of an Israeli Shill

I am writing here to come out of the closet as a paid shill. For a little over six months, I was paid to spread disinformation and argue political points on the Internet...

1
OSS_1 1 point ago +4 / -3

Diary of an Israeli Shill

https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2012/10/12/diary-of-an-israeli-shill/

TINFOIL –- Jewish Control of the Media https://themillenniumreport.com/2016/05/the-motherlode-of-jewish-lists-everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-jewish-control-of-american-society/

Israel to pay students to defend it online

http://news.yahoo.com/israel-pay-students-defend-online-122456876.html

Hasbara Spam Alert

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/09/israel-foreign-ministry-media

The Internet: Israel's New PR Battlefield

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-rise-of-digital-diplomacy-could-be-changing-israels-media-image/

Israel Invests Millions in Drive for Elite 'Cyber Warriors'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/9648820/Israel-invests-millions-in-drive-for-elite-cyber-warriors.html

Israel Recruits "Army of Bloggers" to Combat Anti-Zionist Web Sites

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israel-recruits-army-of-bloggers-to-combat-anti-zionist-web-sites-1.268393

Israel to Hire Pro-Government Tweeters and Facebookers

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57598577-93/israel-to-hire-pro-government-tweeters-and-facebookers/

Israel Targets U.S. Lad Mag Market

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6221714.stm

Israeli Government to Recruit Students as Undercover Agents on Social Media

http://rt.com/news/israel-recruit-students-undercover-509/

Israeli Students to Get $2,000 to Spread State Propaganda on Facebook

http://electronicintifada.net/comment/2626

Prime Minister's Office Recruiting Students to Wage Online Hasbara Battles

http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/.premium-1.541142

3
OSS_1 3 points ago +6 / -3

The amount of propaganda coming out against the International Criminal Court suddenly is astounding. The Federalist literally put out an article saying "The ICC and What Army?"

https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/20/what-army-is-the-icc-sending-to-arrest-benjamin-netanyahu/

4
OSS_1 4 points ago +6 / -2

Being hardened through battle is not necessarily the same as just being hard.

Zechariah 10:5

“They will be as mighty men, Treading down the enemy in the mire of the streets in battle; And they will fight, for the Lord will be with them;"

12
OSS_1 12 points ago +14 / -2

...Marching as to war. With the Cross of Jesus going on before.

2
OSS_1 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the saints." – Ephesians 6:10-18

o7

2
OSS_1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Appreciate you, so let us work together. You share love and I'll flip tables, maybe we can get somewhere together. Some of us are priests, some of us are crusaders.

10
OSS_1 10 points ago +14 / -4

There is no shortage of heresies these days.

If you want to adopt some blasphemous, perverted, fun house mirror reflection of Christianity, you will find a veritable buffet of options. You can sift through all the variants and build your own little pet version of the Faith. It’s Ice Cream Social Christianity: make your own sundae! (Or Sunday, as it were.)

And, of all the heretical choices, probably the most common — and possibly the most damaging — is what I’ve come to call the Nice Doctrine.

The propagators of the Nice Doctrine can be seen and heard from anytime any Christian takes any bold stance on any cultural issue, or uses harsh language of any kind, or condemns any sinful act, or fights against evil with any force or conviction at all. As soon as he or she stands and says ‘This is wrong, and I will not compromise,’ the heretics swoop in with their trusty mantras.

They insist that Jesus was a nice man, and that He never would have done anything to upset people. They say that He came down from Heaven to preach tolerance and acceptance, and He wouldn’t have used words that might lead to hurt feelings. They confidently sermonize about a meek and mild Messiah who was born into this Earthly realm on a mission to spark a constructive dialogue.

The believers in Nice Jesus are usually ignorant of Scripture, but they do know that He was ‘friends with prostitutes,’ and once said something about how, like, we shouldn’t get too ticked off about stuff, or whatever. In their minds, he’s essentially a supernatural Cheech Marin.

Read the comments under my previous post about gay rights militants, and you’ll see this heresy illustrated.

That post prompted an especially noteworthy email from someone concerned that I’m not being ‘Christlike,’ because I ‘call people names.’ He said, in part:

“You aren’t spreading Christianity when you talk like that. The whole message of Jesus was that we should be nice to people because we want them to be nice to us. That’s how we can all be happy. Period. It’s that simple.”

Be nice to me, I’ll be nice to you, and we’ll all be happy. This is the ‘whole message’ of Christianity?

Really?

Jesus Christ preached a Truth no deeper or more complex than a slogan on a poster in a Kindergarten classroom?

Really?

A provocative claim, to say the least. I decided to investigate the matter, and sure enough, I found this excerpt from the Sermon on the Mount:

“We’re best friends like friends should be. With a great big hug, and a kiss from me to you, won’t you say you love me too?”

Actually, wait, sorry, that’s from the original Barney theme song.

God help us. We’ve turned the Son of God into a purple dinosaur puppet.

There’s no way to be certain, but most theologians believe that, despite popular perception, Christ looked nothing like this.

I don’t recognize this Jesus.

This moderate. This pacifist. This nice guy.

He’s not the Jesus I read about in the Bible. I read of a strong, manly, stern, and bold Savior. Compassionate, yes. Forgiving, of course. Loving, always loving. But not particularly nice.

He condemned. He denounced. He caused trouble. He disrupted the established order.

On one occasion — or at least one recorded occasion — He used violence. This Jesus saw the money changers in the temple and how did He respond? He wasn’t polite about it. I’d even say He was downright intolerant. He fashioned a whip (this is what the lawyers would call ‘premeditation’) and physically drove the merchants away. He turned over tables and shouted. He caused a scene. [John 2:15]

Assault with a deadly weapon. Vandalism. Disturbing the peace. Worse still, intolerance.

In two words: not nice.

Not nice at all.

Can you imagine how some moderate, pious, ‘nice’ Christians of today would react to that spectacle in the Temple? Can you envision the proponents of the Nice Doctrine, with their wagging fingers and their passive aggressive sighs? I’m sure they’d send Jesus a patronizing email, perhaps leave a disapproving comment under the news article about the incident, reminding Jesus that Jesus would never do what Jesus just did.

Personally, I’ve studied the New Testament and found not a single instance of Christ calling for a ‘dialogue’ with evil or seeking the middle ground on an issue. I see an absolutist, unafraid of confrontation. I see a man who did not waver or give credence to the other side. I see someone who never once avoided a dispute by saying that He’ll just ‘agree to disagree.’

I see a Christ who calls the Scribes and Pharisees snakes and vipers. He labels them murderers and blind guides, and ridicules them publicly [Matthew 23:33]. He undermines their authority. He insults them. He castigates them. He’s not very nice to them.

Jesus rebukes and condemns. In Matthew 18, He utilizes morbid and violent imagery, saying that it would be better to drown in the sea with a stone around your neck than to harm a child. Had our modern politicians been around two thousand years ago, I’m sure they’d go on the cable news shows and shake their heads and insist that there’s ‘no place for that kind of language.’

No place for the language of God.

Jesus deliberately did and said things that He knew would upset people. He stirred up division and controversy. He provoked. He didn’t have to break from established customs, but He did. He didn’t have to heal that man’s hand on the Sabbath, knowing how it would disturb others and cause them immense irritation, but He did, and He did so with ‘anger’ [Mark 3:5]. He could have gone with the flow a little bit. He could have chilled out and let bygones be bygones, but He didn’t. He could have been diplomatic, but He wasn’t.

He could have told everyone to relax, but instead He made them uncomfortable. He could have put them at ease, but He chose to put them on edge.

He convinced the mob not to stone the adulterer [John 8], and you’ll notice that He then turned to her and told her to stop sinning. Indeed, never once did He encounter sin and corruption and say: “Hey, do your thang, homies. Just have fun. YOLO!”

The followers of Nice Jesus love to quote the ‘throw the first stone’ verse — and for good reason, it’s a beautiful and compelling story — but you rarely hear mention of the exchange that occurs just a few sentences later, in that very same chapter. In John 8:44, Jesus rebukes unbelieving Jews and calls them ‘sons of the Devil.’

Wow.

That wasn’t nice, Jesus.

Didn’t anyone ever tell you that you can catch more flies with honey, Jesus?

Of course, you’d catch even more flies with a mound of garbage, so maybe ‘catching flies’ isn’t the point.

While we’re often reminded that Jesus said, ‘live by the sword, die by the sword,’ we seem to ignore his other sword references. Like when he told his disciples to sell their cloaks and buy a sword [Luke 22], or when He said that He ‘didn’t come to bring peace, but a sword’ [Matthew 10].

Now, It’s true that He is God and we are not. Jesus can say whatever He wants to say. But we are called to be like Christ, which begs the question: what is Christ like?

Well, He is, among other things, uncompromising. He is intolerant of evil. He is disruptive. He is sometimes harsh. He is sometimes impolite. He is sometimes angry.

He is always loving.

Christ was not and is not a cosmic guidance counselor, and He is not mankind’s best friend, nor did He call us to be. He made dogs for that role — our destiny is more substantial, and our path to it is far more challenging and dangerous.

And nice?

Where does nice factor into this?

Nice: affable, peachy, swell.

Nice has nothing to do with Christianity. I’ve got nothing against nice — nice is nice — but even serial killers can be nice to people. They generally are exceptionally affable, except when they’re murdering. That means they’re nice to, like, 97 or 98 percent of everyone they meet.

I guess they’re following Christ almost all of the time, right?

And tolerance?

Tolerance is easy. Any coward can learn to tolerate something. Tolerance is inaction; intolerance is action. We are called to refuse to tolerate evil. We are called to get angry at it and actively work to destroy it.

Who’d have guess it — anger is far more godly than tolerance ever could be.

Obviously I’m not suggesting that anger is automatically, or even usually, justified. Christ exhibited righteous anger; righteous anger is the sort of anger that naturally fills our soul when we confront the depths of depravity and sin. It is wrong to seethe with rage because someone cut us off in traffic or gossips about us behind our back, but it is also wrong to feel no anger when babies are murdered and the institution of the family is undermined and attacked.

Anger is good when it is directed at things that offend not us, but God. Just as Christ’s intolerance, like the intolerance we’re commanded to have, stems from a desire to save souls and defend Truth.

Even when we have righteous anger, we do not have carte blanche to act on it in anyway we please. But, according to the Bible, there are times to use strong language, there are times to cause a scene, there are times to hurt people’s feelings, and there are times when we might need to use physical force.

Jesus told us to turn the other cheek when we are personally attacked; He never told us to turn our backs entirely and let lies spread and evil grow.

So, enough with the niceties.

Christians in this country sound too similar to the the Golden Girls song, and not enough like the Battle Hymn of the Republic. There’s too much ‘thank you for being a friend,’ and not enough ‘lightening from His terrible swift sword.’

We’re all hugging and singing Kumbaya, when we should be marching and shouting Hallelujah.

We’re nice Christians with our nice Jesus, and we are trampled on without protest.

Enough, already.

I think it’s time that Christianity regain its fighting spirit; the spirit of Christ.

I think it’s time we ask that question: ‘What would Jesus do?’

And I think it’s time we answer it truthfully: Jesus would flip tables and yell.

Maybe we ought to follow suit.

https://themattwalshblog.wordpress.com/2014/04/07/jesus-didnt-care-about-being-nice-or-tolerant-and-neither-should-you/

2
OSS_1 2 points ago +3 / -1

There is no shortage of heresies these days.

If you want to adopt some blasphemous, perverted, fun house mirror reflection of Christianity, you will find a veritable buffet of options. You can sift through all the variants and build your own little pet version of the Faith. It’s Ice Cream Social Christianity: make your own sundae! (Or Sunday, as it were.)

And, of all the heretical choices, probably the most common — and possibly the most damaging — is what I’ve come to call the Nice Doctrine.

The propagators of the Nice Doctrine can be seen and heard from anytime any Christian takes any bold stance on any cultural issue, or uses harsh language of any kind, or condemns any sinful act, or fights against evil with any force or conviction at all. As soon as he or she stands and says ‘This is wrong, and I will not compromise,’ the heretics swoop in with their trusty mantras.

They insist that Jesus was a nice man, and that He never would have done anything to upset people. They say that He came down from Heaven to preach tolerance and acceptance, and He wouldn’t have used words that might lead to hurt feelings. They confidently sermonize about a meek and mild Messiah who was born into this Earthly realm on a mission to spark a constructive dialogue.

The believers in Nice Jesus are usually ignorant of Scripture, but they do know that He was ‘friends with prostitutes,’ and once said something about how, like, we shouldn’t get too ticked off about stuff, or whatever. In their minds, he’s essentially a supernatural Cheech Marin.

Read the comments under my previous post about gay rights militants, and you’ll see this heresy illustrated.

That post prompted an especially noteworthy email from someone concerned that I’m not being ‘Christlike,’ because I ‘call people names.’ He said, in part:

“You aren’t spreading Christianity when you talk like that. The whole message of Jesus was that we should be nice to people because we want them to be nice to us. That’s how we can all be happy. Period. It’s that simple.”

Be nice to me, I’ll be nice to you, and we’ll all be happy. This is the ‘whole message’ of Christianity?

Really?

Jesus Christ preached a Truth no deeper or more complex than a slogan on a poster in a Kindergarten classroom?

Really?

A provocative claim, to say the least. I decided to investigate the matter, and sure enough, I found this excerpt from the Sermon on the Mount:

“We’re best friends like friends should be. With a great big hug, and a kiss from me to you, won’t you say you love me too?”

Actually, wait, sorry, that’s from the original Barney theme song.

God help us. We’ve turned the Son of God into a purple dinosaur puppet.

untitled (42) There’s no way to be certain, but most theologians believe that, despite popular perception, Christ looked nothing like this.

I don’t recognize this Jesus.

This moderate. This pacifist. This nice guy.

He’s not the Jesus I read about in the Bible. I read of a strong, manly, stern, and bold Savior. Compassionate, yes. Forgiving, of course. Loving, always loving. But not particularly nice.

He condemned. He denounced. He caused trouble. He disrupted the established order.

On one occasion — or at least one recorded occasion — He used violence. This Jesus saw the money changers in the temple and how did He respond? He wasn’t polite about it. I’d even say He was downright intolerant. He fashioned a whip (this is what the lawyers would call ‘premeditation’) and physically drove the merchants away. He turned over tables and shouted. He caused a scene. [John 2:15]

Assault with a deadly weapon. Vandalism. Disturbing the peace. Worse still, intolerance.

In two words: not nice.

Not nice at all.

Can you imagine how some moderate, pious, ‘nice’ Christians of today would react to that spectacle in the Temple? Can you envision the proponents of the Nice Doctrine, with their wagging fingers and their passive aggressive sighs? I’m sure they’d send Jesus a patronizing email, perhaps leave a disapproving comment under the news article about the incident, reminding Jesus that Jesus would never do what Jesus just did.

Personally, I’ve studied the New Testament and found not a single instance of Christ calling for a ‘dialogue’ with evil or seeking the middle ground on an issue. I see an absolutist, unafraid of confrontation. I see a man who did not waver or give credence to the other side. I see someone who never once avoided a dispute by saying that He’ll just ‘agree to disagree.’

I see a Christ who calls the Scribes and Pharisees snakes and vipers. He labels them murderers and blind guides, and ridicules them publicly [Matthew 23:33]. He undermines their authority. He insults them. He castigates them. He’s not very nice to them.

Jesus rebukes and condemns. In Matthew 18, He utilizes morbid and violent imagery, saying that it would be better to drown in the sea with a stone around your neck than to harm a child. Had our modern politicians been around two thousand years ago, I’m sure they’d go on the cable news shows and shake their heads and insist that there’s ‘no place for that kind of language.’

No place for the language of God.

Jesus deliberately did and said things that He knew would upset people. He stirred up division and controversy. He provoked. He didn’t have to break from established customs, but He did. He didn’t have to heal that man’s hand on the Sabbath, knowing how it would disturb others and cause them immense irritation, but He did, and He did so with ‘anger’ [Mark 3:5]. He could have gone with the flow a little bit. He could have chilled out and let bygones be bygones, but He didn’t. He could have been diplomatic, but He wasn’t.

He could have told everyone to relax, but instead He made them uncomfortable. He could have put them at ease, but He chose to put them on edge.

He convinced the mob not to stone the adulterer [John 8], and you’ll notice that He then turned to her and told her to stop sinning. Indeed, never once did He encounter sin and corruption and say: “Hey, do your thang, homies. Just have fun. YOLO!”

The followers of Nice Jesus love to quote the ‘throw the first stone’ verse — and for good reason, it’s a beautiful and compelling story — but you rarely hear mention of the exchange that occurs just a few sentences later, in that very same chapter. In John 8:44, Jesus rebukes unbelieving Jews and calls them ‘sons of the Devil.’

Wow.

That wasn’t nice, Jesus.

Didn’t anyone ever tell you that you can catch more flies with honey, Jesus?

Of course, you’d catch even more flies with a mound of garbage, so maybe ‘catching flies’ isn’t the point.

While we’re often reminded that Jesus said, ‘live by the sword, die by the sword,’ we seem to ignore his other sword references. Like when he told his disciples to sell their cloaks and buy a sword [Luke 22], or when He said that He ‘didn’t come to bring peace, but a sword’ [Matthew 10].

Now, It’s true that He is God and we are not. Jesus can say whatever He wants to say. But we are called to be like Christ, which begs the question: what is Christ like?

Well, He is, among other things, uncompromising. He is intolerant of evil. He is disruptive. He is sometimes harsh. He is sometimes impolite. He is sometimes angry.

He is always loving.

Christ was not and is not a cosmic guidance counselor, and He is not mankind’s best friend, nor did He call us to be. He made dogs for that role — our destiny is more substantial, and our path to it is far more challenging and dangerous.

And nice?

Where does nice factor into this?

Nice: affable, peachy, swell.

Nice has nothing to do with Christianity. I’ve got nothing against nice — nice is nice — but even serial killers can be nice to people. They generally are exceptionally affable, except when they’re murdering. That means they’re nice to, like, 97 or 98 percent of everyone they meet.

I guess they’re following Christ almost all of the time, right?

And tolerance?

Tolerance is easy. Any coward can learn to tolerate something. Tolerance is inaction; intolerance is action. We are called to refuse to tolerate evil. We are called to get angry at it and actively work to destroy it.

Who’d have guess it — anger is far more godly than tolerance ever could be.

Obviously I’m not suggesting that anger is automatically, or even usually, justified. Christ exhibited righteous anger; righteous anger is the sort of anger that naturally fills our soul when we confront the depths of depravity and sin. It is wrong to seethe with rage because someone cut us off in traffic or gossips about us behind our back, but it is also wrong to feel no anger when babies are murdered and the institution of the family is undermined and attacked.

Anger is good when it is directed at things that offend not us, but God. Just as Christ’s intolerance, like the intolerance we’re commanded to have, stems from a desire to save souls and defend Truth.

Even when we have righteous anger, we do not have carte blanche to act on it in anyway we please. But, according to the Bible, there are times to use strong language, there are times to cause a scene, there are times to hurt people’s feelings, and there are times when we might need to use physical force.

Jesus told us to turn the other cheek when we are personally attacked; He never told us to turn our backs entirely and let lies spread and evil grow.

So, enough with the niceties.

Christians in this country sound too similar to the the Golden Girls song, and not enough like the Battle Hymn of the Republic. There’s too much ‘thank you for being a friend,’ and not enough ‘lightening from His terrible swift sword.’

We’re all hugging and singing Kumbaya, when we should be marching and shouting Hallelujah.

We’re nice Christians with our nice Jesus, and we are trampled on without protest.

Enough, already.

I think it’s time that Christianity regain its fighting spirit; the spirit of Christ.

I think it’s time we ask that question: ‘What would Jesus do?’

And I think it’s time we answer it truthfully: Jesus would flip tables and yell.

Maybe we ought to follow suit.

2
OSS_1 2 points ago +3 / -1

19While Pilate was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent him this message: “Have nothing to do with that innocent man, for I have suffered terribly in a dream today because of Him.”

20But the chief priests and elders persuaded the crowds to ask for Barabbas and to have Jesus put to death.

21“Which of the two do you want me to release to you?” asked the governor.

“Barabbas,” they replied.

22“What then should I do with Jesus who is called Christ?” Pilate asked.

They all answered, “Crucify Him!”

23“Why?” asked Pilate. “What evil has He done?”

But they shouted all the louder, “Crucify Him!”

24When Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but that instead a riot was breaking out, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,c” he said. “You bear the responsibility.”

25All the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!”

26So Pilate released Barabbas to them. But he had Jesus flogged, and handed Him over to be crucified.

1
OSS_1 1 point ago +3 / -2

Zionists are still just a front and only one facade of the Satanists who are trying to destroy us all.

Greater Israel is their planned means of control to force the One World Government through international shipping lanes. Zionist, satanist, Luciferians, jews, gentiles it makes no difference. The seat of power is in Israel.

Regardless of all that, satanists or not, no other countries should get a free pass to send military personnel here to maim/murder college students. And beyond that, the people planning the attacks should not be going on Fox News to celebrate and brag about it.

Aaron Cohen an Israeli intelligence officer can also be seen here https://archive.is/g8bYY working with the LASD at UCLA during all of this.

Aaron Cohen

https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6352207133112

Aaron Cohen

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6352215935112

-1
OSS_1 -1 points ago +5 / -6

Question of the Day:

Should foreign soldiers be able to enter the the US with the intent to harm/kill American college students without a visa, or should we force the Israelis to get one first?

Edit: I saw your downvotes, my fault, I forgot add "Not all Jews" disclaimer before the question. Now that we have that out of the way, what do you guys think? Is illegal immigration ok if it is an Israeli Operative?

3
OSS_1 3 points ago +5 / -2

Leaked chat reveals coordinated pressure campaign by Jewish billionaires to crush pro-Palestine protest

https://justicereport.news/2024/05/19/leaked-chats-reveal-jewish-cabals-pressure-campaign-to-crush-anti-zionist-dissent/

IDF member and Israeli CEO linked to bloody attack at UCLA

https://justicereport.net/2024/05/16/idf-member-and-israeli-ceo-linked-to-bloody-attack-at-ucla/

UCLA Attackers Exposed: Meet the Violent Zionist Agitators LA Police Haven’t Arrested

https://scheerpost.com/2024/05/16/ucla-attackers-exposed-meet-the-violent-zionist-agitators-la-police-havent-arrested/amp/

A few weeks ago at a group of pro-Zionist/Israel thugs showed up to the encampment at UCLA and beat the shit out of the unarmed protestors with metal poles, baseball bats, and 2x4s for over 4 hours straight while the LAPD watched and did nothing. It was captured on livestream and even on helicopter cam for the whole world to see.

For weeks the LAPD, the FBI, and the DA have been unwilling to identify and arrest the ones responsible. This injustice will no longer stand, the identities of these criminals who are guilty of countless violent counts and even attempted murder (pic related) are now being released.

Through the investigation we have identified one of the perpetrators as Alon Abishoor. Alon Abishoor comes from a very wealthy family and through my investigation I have found him and his entire family to be running a money laundering scheme with nearly a dozen 501(c)s and a fraudulent real estate company along with multiple investment LLCs.

None of these people are American Citizens, they are all here on 90 day visits that don't require Visas. They are running fraudulent companies, scamming US tax dollars, one of them is literally a foreign soldier attempting to murder US citizens on US soil.

The media, the LAPD, the DA, the Governor NO ONE is willing to touch these jews because they are rich and powerful! NO MORE! Their names are now known to all!

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/468201839/

UPDATE: https://x.com/KyungLahCNN/status/1790908711898165639

CNN reports on the violence for the first time in three weeks and names a few names (not the important ones though) -- CNN names pic related as "Edon On" and he "Plans to join the IDF in September" also "He is 17 years old"

CNN also confirms no pending/active investigation from LAPD, CHP, or UCLA Police as everyone suspected.

The United States Congress is obligated to bring these people to justice.

The name of one such IDF soldier was Eliran Bismut. He was in the US not on a VISA but on a 90 day "special visiting pass" that allows Israelis to bypass VISA requirements. HE IS AN ISRAELI SOLDIER WHO SPECIFICALLY CAME TO THE US TO ATTACK AMERICAN CITIZENS AND ATTEMPT TO SERIOUSLY INJUR OR KILL THEM. Eliran Bismut a literal IDF soldier who had his brother recently killed in Gaza. He was there to crack skulls and he accomplished that goal using a large piece of wood to crush a mans skull in to the point where it needed over 20 staples

To make matters worse the DA, the Police Chief, the FBI, every LEO is actively protecting these men after they so viciously and brazenly attempted to kill American Citizens on livestream. There are no warrants out for their arrests. There ARE no ongoing investigations. The media is refusing to talk about it!

ARCHIVES OF PREVIOUS THREADS: https://archive.is/7Du6v

https://archive.is/oZLsd

https://archive.is/9L0we

https://archive.is/npT4x

https://archive.is/DF0db

https://archive.is/yK79R

https://archive.is/qcMGV

https://archive.is/oZLsd

https://archive.is/9L0we

https://archive.is/g4DA5

https://archive.is/DF0db

https://archive.is/37x4q

https://archive.is/qcMGV

https://archive.is/vXKCw

https://archive.is/bx8h8

https://archive.is/p5Bbg

https://archive.is/OzXgT

https://archive.is/KtAJF

NAMES

Alon Abishoor

Rony Abishoor

Maytal Abishoor

Aviel Fattal

Eliran Bismut

Nathan Shaolian

ELAN CARR - FORMER LA DDA

Malachi Joshua Marlan-Librett

Alon Abishoor comes from an extremely wealthy and jewish family with lots of connections

He is running 5 or 6 501(c)s out of the same address and he is listed as the Chief Financial Officer for all of them (Pic related)

The other employees at his companies consist of members of his family such as Rony Abishoor

Alon Abishoor supposedly works at House of Shoor (another family business) which as of a few hours ago took its instagram account private in an attempt to hide more information from leaking out https://www.instagram.com/houseofshoor/

When Alon's identity was first discovered somehow he immediately was able to dox his doxxer (within 15 minutes) who posted Alon's information on Instagram and sent him this seething and threatening voicemail demanding that he take down the post or Alon would use his connections and destroy the doxxers "Credit Score": https://vocaroo.com/1iyfjxMIlxrA

Rony Abishoor recently (as of 2022) purchased a multi-million dollar development property in LA.

Rony Abishoor

listed as contact for Love is Real Movement 501(c)

SALE

DATE: 03/31/2022

?ADDRESS: 315-319 N. Alvarado St.

MARKET: Los Angeles

ASSET TYPE: Development Site

BUYER: Rony Abishoor

SELLER: Justin Bokhoor

BROKERS: Nathan Shaolian (@NathanShaolian) & Ardy Ishal (@ArdyIshal) - BRC Advisors

SALE PRICE: $1,375,000

Looks like when they aren't conducting seemingly shady business through their 501(c)s they are buying lots of multi million dollar properties.

Money laundering for MOSSAD?

Would explain why the Police Chief, the DA, and even the FBI are unwilling to go after these men despite overwhelming evidence of them committing assault, attempted murder, battery, and hate crimes on livestream.

This is Eliran Bismut, Here is Eliran Bismut proud to be a soldier

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1714591598187552.webm

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715760335523519.jpg

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715761744834714.png

His brother who died

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715757896773408.png

This is Alon Abishoor

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715716179352023.jpg

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715762979054570.jpg

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715716087009290.jpg

This is his families money laundering operation that they run through half a dozen or more 501(c)s

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715726556608247.png

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715744148541177.jpg

More Ashiboor MOSSAD Unit

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715726556608247.png

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715727074302529.jpg

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715675484159610.jpg

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715731615111959.jpg

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715732046968894.jpg

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715733731436629.jpg

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715735483962613.png

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715735931361517.png

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715736989153220.png

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715737595838652.png

Maytal and Shai Abishoor which are both listed as employees at Alon Abishoors 501(c)s both signed this letter which was sent to UCLA administration.

https://dailybruin.com/2015/05/20/submission-uc-must-protect-jewish-students-combat-anti-semitism

This is a whole family of IDF agents

IDF Agent Dodgers Cap

https://i.not4pcdn.org/pol/1715733432987136.jpg

Meet UCLA attacker MALACHI JOSHUA MARLAN-LIBRETT.

https://twitter.com/FilmThePoliceLA/status/1791147781635309878

https://twitter.com/FilmThePoliceLA/status/1791157909935833479

Video of MALACHI JOSHUA MARLAN-LIBRETT repeatedly assaulting a protester.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1791169078700519777

Here is Malachi Joshua Marlan-Librett making on @ABC7 the day after he assaulted UCLA students and journalists. A week later, UCLA responded by arresting journalists that covered this event.

Not the attackers.

https://twitter.com/FilmThePoliceLA/status/1791185884873904433

Aerial shot of Malachi Joshua Marlan-Librett attacking the black journalist in the blue hi vis

https://twitter.com/repeatwatch/status/1791186979230556233

MEET ELAN CARR, FMR DEPUTY DA IN LOS ANGELES & FORMER SPECIAL ENVOY TO MONITOR AND COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM. DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO ABISHOOR THIS GROUP. CURRENT CEO OF THE ISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/468267263#p468267263

MEET TOM BIBIYAN

https://x.com/i/status/179094139884768494

House of Shoor = 12 letters/12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL

Be Careful Who You Follow. Symbolism will be there DOWNFALL.

https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1kByLOz/be-careful-who-you-follow-symbol/c/

12 Letter News Agencies - 12 Tribes - Obama IRS Scandal - [MOS]/[AJ] Backed Media - Edited Graphic to conform with rules

https://greatawakening.win/p/17siXSOSG6/12-letter-news-agencies--12-trib/c/

MEET Matin Mehdizadeh - Throwing fireworks into crowds

https://x.com/ACatWithNews/status/1791005400374165863

Aaron Cohen an Israeli intelligence officer can also be seen here https://archive.is/g8bYY working with the LASD at UCLA during all of this.

Aaron Cohen on Fox Business

https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6352207133112

Aaron Cohen on Fox News

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6352215935112

-2
OSS_1 -2 points ago +1 / -3
  1. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad.

Try again.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›