1
truthloveliberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sound like someone who doesn’t know a thing about programming or code.

Any programmer can read the Bitcoin code and check for any issues like you describe.

And the whole point of blockchain is it makes the code tamper proof.

3
truthloveliberty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe Trump goes into “prison” 10 days…. To keep him protected during final phase of The Storm?

1
truthloveliberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s the cool thing about blockchains, nothing in the code can be changed without everyone knowing about it. Thats the whole point.

1
truthloveliberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah… it would be total chaos and mayhem. No one will be concerned about metals, just bullets.

2
truthloveliberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can trust the code. Thats the good thing about open-source software. It’s just math. You can trust math.

2
truthloveliberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can track your cashing out of crypto at centralized (licensed) exchanges. But other than that, you can remain anonymous. Thats why, ultimately, we don’t sell our crypto on an exchange, we use it to transact just like we would dollars. This is how we build a counter/parallel economy to starve the Beast.

You need to do your homework Mr. Princeton.

2
truthloveliberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bitcoin’s value is derived from its protocol, which is built on a scarcity principle, secure nature, and stakeholder interest as a savings technology.

Bitcoin serves as digital gold, offering an inflation hedge and currency debasement protection.

Market cycles and liquidity shifts drive Bitcoin’s price volatility.

Bitcoin security is reinforced because of its high computational power and energy, which protects against potential attacks and bad actors.

-4
truthloveliberty -4 points ago +4 / -8

Wrong about it being vaporware. You haven’t done your homework.

2
truthloveliberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

And he’s probably clueless how Obama and Holder were doing exactly that.

4
truthloveliberty 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually, he has touched upon this topic before today. Even last week. And there’s even a compilation video floating around from a couple years ago showing him calling out the Zionist and Mossad.

1
truthloveliberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Real movements don’t go mainstream. They never succeed. We will never break free. Because you Q people trust the government and never taking action. So cool your jets people. Nothing is happening. Go back to sleep.”

I always ask people like that: So what are you doing that I’m not doing? How have I been lulled into complacency?

1
truthloveliberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t think people say he shills for Zionism, but that he “never blames Zionism.”

3
truthloveliberty 3 points ago +4 / -1

My personal theory is that Alex was always good but got compromised… probably by his first wife.

He had to avoid certain topics and occasionally do certain things to comply.

Mossad had someone on staff at InfoWars/supplements.

Q said certain people would be freed from such bondage and would be counted among us. Alex was always good and a patriot, but was being threatened.

Alex’s chains were broke (he was set free from Mossad) during Trump’s term.

Trump and Alex (etc) talked and Alex was given a role.

Alex was to support Trump — but to act as though there is no Q Plan.

This would serve to keep the media from conflating Alex/Infowars and Q and Trump as one/same.

So you’d have typical Republican Trump supporters … conspiracy/patriot Trump supporters (led/inspired by people like Alex)… and Q Trump supporters (us). Alex serves as a bridge to the Great Awakening. Stepping stone.

7
truthloveliberty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Vivek defended Trump the whole campaign. He didn’t suddenly start “brown nosing” after it ended. He was consistent.

1
truthloveliberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

I added the question, “right??” because I’m not saying it with certainty. Just asking our forum for feedback and insight.

1
truthloveliberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Continue in your ignorance and see where it gets you.

Of course we are in the middle of a war.

3
truthloveliberty 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is dumb. Lots of stuff taken out of context, first of all. One context being that many clips are from when he was younger, before his ideas evolved to what they are today.

And he addressed his brief role doing research with a group that reported for the UN.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›