A central paradox of the modern American presidency is that citizens regularly call for strong presidential leadership while at the same time their political culture predisposes them to be reluctant followers.1 One of the ways contemporary presidents resolve this paradox is by invoking an electoral mandate. By persuading others that he possesses a mandate from the voters to pursue a particular policy agenda, a president can disguise his leadership under the pretense of simply carrying out “the will of the people.” The presidential mandate thus enables presidents to lead while seeming to follow, to exercise power over people under the guise of empowering the people.

Ellis, R., & Kirk, S. (1995). Presidential Mandates in the Nineteenth Century: Conceptual Change and Institutional Development. Studies in American Political Development, 9(1), 117-186. doi:10.1017/S0898588X00001188