Under Toxicity Conclusions near the end of the document.
"....In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated."
If sharing with normies, beware of the following.
"These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time and do not reflect a specific finding of concern."
So UK is still not acknowledging the harm the product was proven to cause during the trials. They're only stating the reality that existed prior to the clinical trials, before the harm was known.
Basically the UK advice is based on info that is more than two years stale...
Yes, they are not coming out just yet to admit the genocide, but the fact they do admit they still can't confirm safety, given the incessant 'safe and effective' mantra, and push to get pregnant and breastfeeding mothers vaccinated, hopefully this will wake a few people up.
For any naysayers you come across, a video I saw yesterday may help, with an Australian politician and doctor talking about the massive increases in miscarriage and stillbirths, and birth rates declines: https://t.me/s/craigkelly/2759
What study showed the proven harm? Might be useful to help solidify the foundation of the argument
That is from the Pfizer studies that were being held suppressed from release. I'll try to track down a primary source link and page number later.
Okay please do! Because it’s one pretty minor thing to have lack of data but proven harm is huge
Here is the Pfizer FOIA dump:
https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
You can search for:
125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-interim-mth6-adverse-events
..and you'll get a big pdf. And at that point you're in the weeds with the rest of us, because the analysis I'm finding in the last hour or so is admittedly not strong in support of my point.
Firstly it appears that Naomi Wolf mis-analyzed this data at least partly. Not to blame her (there are literally thousands of documents to go through in no order whatsoever, with many thousands more still unreleased). It makes conclusions very hard to draw. She grouped "adverse events" with "serious adverse events" that ended up in a double count. You can read the rundown here:
https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=10017
But AFAICT it's still not determined what the exact proportion is, or at least I haven't seen anyone put together a good series of steps to obtain a well-reasoned number.
So for example if you search for this subject in the .pdf: "C4591001 1013 10131255", you'll see her twice but the argument is that is a single event (makes sense). And you can also go back up to phmpt and search for her by id.
We also don't know the setup of the study as far as picking subjects and whether they were screened in any way as regards to whether they intended to start a family. All sorts of possibilities here. I think Pfizer would know how to setup the study to get the results they want..
I'll dig a bit more and if I come across something interesting I'll let you know. It's an extremely difficult topic to dig on because the search engines censor it heavily so if you don't know a few starting point sites you have no primary source material to review--just "fact checks".
Thanks for the detailed answer! I don’t doubt that it’s tricky to find all the answers, but I’m interested in seeing what we can dig up! I’ll poke around too
Pfizer's own documents show evidence of harm, as there were elevated miscarriage rates in the jab trial groups.
Naomi Wolf has been discussing it a fair bit.
Which documents though?
None, they don't exist, we're making it all up.
…are you against showing me or something?
Lol you clearly got the info from somewhere, I’m just asking where. You don’t need to get butthurt if someone doesn’t just take your word for it
I work for Pfizer and they are safe, trust me. Lol.
As I mentioned, Naomi Wolf; they have an entire team of around 2500 people going through all the Pfizer docs released by court order.
She has spoken a few times about the issues seen in trials, but covered up or glossed over.
Dailyclout.io is the website. That would be a good starting point for you to go.
https://dailyclout.io/multiple-concerns-emerging-around-covid-vaccines-reproductive-health/
And there are also multiple anecdotes from reproductive health doctors that are seeing issues in their practice - it's happening.
Bro if you wanna have a genuine conversation let’s have one. I’m not interested if you’re just gonna be jumping back and forth with sarcasm
MSM won't report it. Their Rockfeller funding would be gone otherwise.