The FBI massively erred about civilians stopping active shooters
I’m one of those who believes that what stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Sometimes, that good guy is a police officer, and sometimes, the good guy is a civilian. Leftists claim that the good guys’ contribution is so in...
Why wouldn't they lie if there's no consequences, only benefits?
That's precisely the question. Why is there no consequence? Or is there? I've learned that if you can't file a lawsuit against an entity that has immunity, you attempt to separate the individual from the immune entity. In order to pursue a lawsuit against the individual, the identity of the individual(s) is need. Was the individual representing and acting in the trust and capacity of the agency or were they acting in the interests their own personal agenda? Does the agency approve of this individual's behavior? If this can't be achieved through FOIA and other mechanisms, then the next best tactic is to file a lawsuit against the unscrupulous practice of the attorney representing the agency. Someone must always pay for bad behavior and evil.
You had me at the FBI lied.
It's only for the headline readers.
They then parrot that around as fact.
"erred"
ie
lied