Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

It's important to remember that "no outside comms" means no "This is Q" comms outside their unique ID on that platform.

It doesn't mean no outside comms at all. For example, DJT does outside comms all the time. Pompeo, Scavino and Flynn likely do as well (though Flynn is more disinfo than info imo). There may be others also.

People use "no outside comms" as justification for ignoring someone or justifying some belief in ways that it was never intended to be applied.

For someone like Simon who says "I spoke to Q" you know you can immediately ignore him with no loss of good info. For other things, like GeorgeNews, we didn't know for sure until research was done on them whether they were an insider or not. They never pretended to be Q, nor did they ever pretend to have "spoken to Q". In truth, I'm still not convinced they are intentional disinfo, though I doubt they are an insider.

Perhaps a less controversial example is Lin Wood. We don't know whether or not some of his info is his own research, or directly from Trump. And if its directly from Trump, its not too hard to assume that it would fall into that "no outside comms" category for some people even though it would be in that case legitimate comms, from a Q source (assuming Trump is a Q source), outside of 8kun.

3 years ago
4 score
Reason: Original

It's important to remember that means no "This is Q" comms outside their unique ID on that platform.

It doesn't mean no outside comms at all. For example, DJT does outside comms all the time. Pompeo, Scavino and Flynn likely do as well (though Flynn is more disinfo than info imo). There may be others also.

People use "no outside comms" as justification for ignoring someone or justifying some belief in ways that it was never intended to be applied.

For someone like Simon who says "I spoke to Q" you know you can immediately ignore him with no loss of good info. For other things, like GeorgeNews, we didn't know for sure until research was done on them whether they were an insider or not. They never pretended to be Q, nor did they ever pretend to have "spoken to Q". In truth, I'm still not convinced they are intentional disinfo, though I doubt they are an insider.

Perhaps a less controversial example is Lin Wood. We don't know whether or not some of his info is his own research, or directly from Trump. And if its directly from Trump, its not too hard to assume that it would fall into that "no outside comms" category for some people even though it would be in that case legitimate comms, from a Q source (assuming Trump is a Q source), outside of 8kun.

3 years ago
1 score