When it came out, yes. No repeat viewings.

I am not skeptical of the possibility of election fraud. It could have happened.

I am skeptical that the BEST explanation is that enough people could come together as would be needed to attack an elections monitored internationally so effectively and so secretly that it seems largely impossible to prove it through any legal channels, in any court of law, and so forth. And doing that all while the guy they were trying to unseat ran the entire government and apparently knew they were coming.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence is all. Election fraud is an extraordinary claim.

For your claim to be true, it means that tens of thousands, probably hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of criminals are lying to me. Tens of thousands of people knowingly, secretly, and maliciously committing massive crimes and expertly covering it up. Which is possible.

I personally find it highly challenging to believe that so many government people could do ANYTHING expertly.

For your claim to not be true, it largely requires one man to have lied to you about the election being stolen from him. And for enough people to believe that lie that they begin using confirmation bias to interpret small and vague incidents to support the belief in that lie.

I believe that the media and politicians and scientists are certainly capable of lying. But when it comes to an extraordinary claim requiring an extraordinary solution (replacing the President), we will need extraordinary evidence. I can't let the fact that the media twists things cause me to assume that literally everything they say is a lie.

Knowing that the media lies means that I evaluate every claim they make. Not that I discount what they claim.

And I have to choose between two possibilities: That Trump is a liar, or that literally everyone EXCEPT Trump is a liar.

And so far, I can explain literally everything that's happening in the world by accepting that Trump is a narcissistic liar who lies to serve his narcissism. I can't explain or predict nearly as much (like the vaccines) by accepting that Trump is what Q claims him to be.

When it came out, yes. No repeat viewings.

I am not skeptical of the possibility of election fraud. It could have happened.

I am skeptical that the BEST explanation is that enough people could come together as would be needed to attack an elections monitored internationally so effectively and so secretly that it seems largely impossible to prove it through any legal channels, in any court of law, and so forth. And doing that all while the guy they were trying to unseat ran the entire government and apparently knew they were coming.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence is all. Election fraud is an extraordinary claim.

For your claim to be true, it means that tens of thousands, probably hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of criminals are lying to me. Tens of thousands of people knowingly, secretly, and maliciously committing massive crimes and expertly covering it up. Which is possible.

I personally find it highly challenging to believe that so many government people could do ANYTHING expertly.

For your claim to not be true, it largely requires one man to have lied to you about the election being stolen from him. And for enough people to believe that lie that they begin using confirmation bias to interpret small and vague incidents to support the belief in that lie.

I believe that the media and politicians and scientists are certainly capable of lying. But when it comes to an extraordinary claim requiring an extraordinary solution (replacing the President), we will need extraordinary evidence.

And I have to choose between two possibilities: That Trump is a liar, or that literally everyone EXCEPT Trump is a liar.

And so far, I can explain literally everything that's happening in the world by accepting that Trump is a narcissistic liar who lies to serve his narcissism. I can't explain or predict nearly as much (like the vaccines) by accepting that Trump is what Q claims him to be.

When it came out, yes. No repeat viewings.

I am not skeptical of the possibility of election fraud. It could have happened.

I am skeptical that the BEST explanation is that enough people could come together as would be needed to attack an elections monitored internationally so effectively and so secretly that it seems largely impossible to prove it through any legal channels, in any court of law, and so forth. And doing that all while the guy they were trying to unseat ran the entire government and apparently knew they were coming.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence is all. Election fraud is an extraordinary claim.

For your claim to be true, it means that tens of thousands, probably hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of criminals are lying to me. Tens of thousands of people knowingly, secretly, and maliciously committing massive crimes and expertly covering it up. Which is possible.

For your claim to not be true, it largely requires one man to have lied to you about the election being stolen from him. And for enough people to believe that lie that they begin using confirmation bias to interpret small and vague incidents to support the belief in that lie.

I believe that the media and politicians and scientists are certainly capable of lying. But when it comes to an extraordinary claim requiring an extraordinary solution (replacing the President), we will need extraordinary evidence.

And I have to choose between two possibilities: That Trump is a liar, or that literally everyone EXCEPT Trump is a liar.

And so far, I can explain literally everything that's happening in the world by accepting that Trump is a narcissistic liar who lies to serve his narcissism. I can't explain or predict nearly as much (like the vaccines) by accepting that Trump is what Q claims him to be.