I tend to agree it is not specifically a "kill shot. "
It is also not a vaccine.
There is no scientific evidence that it prevents anyone from getting Covid or any other illness.
There is no scientific evidence that it prevents anyone from spreading Covid or any other illness.
There isn't even any evidence that it reduces symptoms. The Pfizer study showed a less than 1% difference in the test group vs. the control group in regard to reducing symptoms. This is when the statistics are looked at correctly, rather than being misreported the way Pfizer and the media did (i.e. they lied about the results).
And we don't even know if that small difference is valid at all because the study was flawed in so many ways: it was not a double blind study, it appears that both groups got the drug (the control group, too), results were declared after just 7 days rather than a more typical several months or years, and the raw data has never been released so that other researchers could verify the trial results. On top of all that, Pfizer did not disclose in their two reports how they determined if someone in the study "had Covid." If they used the PCR as a diagnostic tool, then the entire study is meaningless.
Add to that the big increase in deaths and injuries reported in the VAERS system and the huge amount of miscarriages in pregnant women that were reported (over 100 in 800 pregnancies).
Something is suspect, for sure. It may not be a massive "kill shot," but that does not mean it is not harmful.
More importantly, it is a setup for future shots, and we have no way of knowing what those might include.
I tend to agree it is not specifically a "kill shot. "
It is also not a vaccine.
There is no scientific evidence that it prevents anyone from getting Covid or any other illness.
There is no scientific evidence that it prevents anyone from spreading Covid or any other illness.
There isn't even any evidence that it reduces symptoms. The Pfizer study showed a less than 1% difference in the test group vs. the control group in regard to reducing symptoms. This is when the statistics are looked at correctly, rather than being misreported the way Pfizer and the media did (i.e. they lied about the results).
And we don't even know if that small difference is valid at all because the study was flawed in so many ways: it was not a double blind study, it appears that both groups got the drug (the control group, too), results were declared after just 7 days rather than a more typical several months or years, and the raw data has never been released so that other researchers could verify the trial results. On top of all that, Pfizer did not disclose in their two reports how the determined if someone in the study "had Covid." If they used the PCR as a diagnostic tool, then the entier study is meaningless.
Add to that the big increase in deaths and injuries reported in the VAERS system and the huge amount of miscarriages in pregnant women that were reported (over 100 in 800 pregnancies).
Something is suspect, for sure. It may not be a massive "kill shot," but that does not mean it is not harmful.
More importantly, it is a setup for future shots, and we have no way of knowing what those might include.