I say the same thing.

If the test can’t identify the very thing it’s testing for, then that means the virus hasn’t been isolated. If the virus has, indeed, been isolated, then the tests would be accurate. The tests are not accurate, therefore, the virus the tests are looking for has not been isolated.

I think there are two viable explanations as to why there is no isolation:

A) Covid doesn’t exist. The flu and the cold have been hijacked, coupled with incentives for drs to code for this thing they call “covid,”and a media push of epic proportions...viola, there’s your global scamdemic. Let’s not forget the exponential jump in flu deaths back in 2018. 80,000 influenza deaths that year.

B) Gain of function. If Covid DOES exist, then [They] DON’T want it isolated. Otherwise the gain of function portion of the genome would be exposed.

I say the same thing.

If the test can’t identify the very thing it’s testing for, then that means the virus hasn’t been isolated. If the virus has, indeed, been isolated, then the tests would be accurate. The tests are not accurate, therefore, the virus the tests are looking for has not been isolated.

I think there are two viable explanations as to why there is no isolation:

A) Covid doesn’t exist. The flu and the cold have been hijacked, coupled with incentives for drs to code for this thing they call “covid,”and a media push of epic proportions...viola, there’s your global scaled mic. Let’s not forget the exponential jump in flu deaths back in 2018. 80,000 influenza deaths that year.

B) Gain of function. If Covid DOES exist, then [They] DON’T want it isolated. Otherwise the gain of function portion of the genome would be exposed.