Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

No worries, fren. The problem with your way of viewing the numbers is that you're missing a whole bunch of variables.

For example to make the claim that instead of 700k deaths it would be 2m you would need data that the government is simply not providing. The gov labels anyone who dies or is hospitalized within the 14 day window after second jab as non jabbed. That Immediately skews the numbers.

They don't release the number of repeat patients in ICU/hospitalized. They don't release terminal/non-terminal data and considering the vast majority of deaths are elderly from nursing homes who have multiple comorbidities, it becomes impossible to make the claim that the jab is doing any saving at all.

In fact, since I posted that post, Ontario now has DOUBLE the amount of people in ICU who are two dose vs one dose even though there are MORE one dosers.

You for whatever reason believe the government on this issue but call them crooks otherwise. Wake up. And if you're going to try and prove a point using numbers, understand how numbers actually work.

Find me the data that subtracts every single 14 day window jabbed death/ICU/hospitalization, terminal patients not due to covid, and all the labelled as covid deaths because they were tested positive within a 14 day window prior to death and then let's talk about data.

The issue is you'll never be able to because it doesn't exist and it doesn't exist because it's easier to prey on and fool gullible people like you than it is being honest.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

No worries, fren. The problem with your way of viewing the numbers is that you're missing a whole bunch of variables.

For example to make the claim that instead of 700k deaths it would be 2m you would need data that the government is simply not providing. The gov labels anyone who dies or is hospitalized within the 14 day window after second jab as non jabbed. That Immediately skews the numbers.

They don't release the number of repeat patients in ICU/hospitalized. They don't release terminal/non-terminal data and considering the vast majority of deaths are elderly from nursing homes who have multiple comorbidities, it becomes impossible to make the claim that the jab is doing any saving at all.

In fact, since I posted that post, Ontario now has DOUBLE the amount of people in ICU who are two dose vs one dose even though there are MORE one dosers.

You for whatever reason believe the government on this issue not call them crooks otherwise. Wake up. And if you're going to try and prove a point using numbers, understand how numbers actually work.

2 years ago
1 score