Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Women are 69% of the reports.

Since these are strictly voluntary reports, its difficult to say how much of this due to actual gender reaction differences and how much is due to social gender differences (men complain about pain less frequently than women e.g. (at least publicly)).

Nervous system disorders appear to be the majority complaints at just shy of 1 million which is almost half of the reports

Each individual report can have multiple "adverse reactions". That doesn't negate the statement, but it is necessary context to keep in mind.

This is despite the fact that cardiac and blood disorders get most of the coverage of what is reported by main stream news.

Looking at the breakdown of the "nervous system" reactions, about 2/3rds were "headache." A headache by itself is hardly surprising, and is a very likely outcome for any proper immune reaction (getting sick from a real virus, a "good" reaction to a real vaccine, etc.). Headaches to me are not concerning at all (as a statistical data point).

Most of the nervous systems disorders are really not that bad. Some are of course, and there may be long term nervous system effects (multiple sclerosis e.g.) caused by the autoimmune nature of these immunotherapies.

Its important to separate these two types of responses though, and recognize the likely impacts of each. Many (though not all) of the cardiovascular issues are caused by an attack of the spike protein on the ACE-2 receptor. While both types of responses can be debilitating, one is an immune response, the other is a toxin attack (in this case a venom since it is an injected toxin).

Could this be deliberate to deflect from where the real problems are lurking?

I don't think so. I think the reports give reasonably good statistics, but like all statistics you have to dig, and you have to recognize the regime that they are reporting. In this case they are only reporting short term effects. Long term effects require actual study and of course time. Both of these are currently insufficient in general, without any specific mal-intent outside of the general evil of the whole endeavor.

I am sure that the US numbers are dramatically underreported if VAERS is any indication.

I imagine the underreporting rate is similar in both regions and all reaction types (that second may not be true). My guess is it is around 10-20 times underreported based on what info I have been able to put together. Its an educated guess, but only a guess.

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders follow neurological issues and I am sure there is a common link between the two.

These particular nervous system disorders are relatively rare by the numbers (at least short term reactions). While there is evidence these have occurred, and they will likely occur in the long term, they are still not in the same scope as the cardiovascular issues (toxin v. immune reaction) according to the data.

2 years ago
1 score