yes, that's exactly the point. injecting tens of millions of tons of nanoparticulate in the atmosphere while studying the impact is how research is done. you could say it's a "study", it is -- but not from or for a public health interest. the "research" is not being done under any regulatory agency or law.

you can read from the US House of Representatives hearings on Geoengineering from 2009-2010 , there's plenty of discussion on geoengineering being somewhat outside the scope of governmental agencies.

here David Keith says: "there could be something terrible we find tomorrow that we haven't look at"

yes, that's exactly the point. injecting tens of millions of tons of nanoparticulate in the atmosphere while studying the impact is how research is done. you could say it's a "study", it is -- but not from or for a public health interest. the "research" is not being done under any regulatory agency or law.

you can read from the US House of Representatives hearings on Geoengineering from 2009-2010 , there's plenty of discussion on geoengineering being somewhat outside the scope of governmental agencies.

here David Keith says: there could be something terrible we find tomorrow that we haven't look at