So ... This is actually a fun read, AND serious analysis. Everybody should read it, and maybe watch a longer video of the wrestling match. Like he says, it's a hoot! And it's very instructive as to how Trump operates.
But the speculation about the future is just that: pure speculation. Personally I think the speculation is pretty far out there, derived from a mistake in an early assumption, that assumption being that the current session of congress is legitimate. And that Trump needs the Supreme Court as part of his comeback. I won't dismiss those ideas or the speculation, but it's important to acknowledge where the difference is. Also that going through the SC means that it won't be done militarily with a flurry of mass arrests and tribunals, but instead through the current civil court system.
I think devolution based on illegitimate elections precludes the legitimacy of this session of congress, and of their presidential election, and therefore any need for SCOTUS to be involved, unless they could overturn all the down-ballot elections at one fell swoop installing a 100% new congress. And if we're going to prosecute the indictments of 300K+ assorted traitors, pedos, criminals and spies, dragging things through SCOTUS first, just doesn't seem a practical way to get it done. It also does nothing about the Fed, or the gradual choking of our freedoms through unconstitutional regulations by states and congress.
There is a possibility that this stuff can happen just for show, window dressing for the masses, with the tribunals having been already done secretly while we've been talking on GA. I hate that idea, but it's possible despite my feelings. Q did tell us "the choice to know will be yours," after all. That could mean a real solution in the background with an easy & fake solution for the masses. But I think we'll need to see tribunals broadcast and proof of treason presented to the public, to avoid civil war.
(I'm on the other extreme, thinking that we'll restore the Old Republic before the corporation, roll all federal laws back to 1870, and have martial law while a new election is set up to elect president #19, with the military ensuring fair state elections, governing the then-unadmitted states as territories until then. But I don't have proof of that, either, plus it sounds too good to be true.)
TLDR. It's good analysis of Trump's style, and logical speculation based premises that I disagree with. And a fun read!
So ... This is actually a fun read, AND serious analysis. Everybody should read it, and maybe watch a longer video of the wrestling match. Like he says, it's a hoot! And it's very instructive as to how Trump operates.
But the speculation about the future is just that: pure speculation. Personally I think the speculation is pretty far out there, derived from a mistake in an early assumption, that assumption being that the current session of congress is legitimate. And that Trump needs the Supreme Court as part of his comeback. I won't dismiss those ideas or the speculation, but it's important to acknowledge where the difference is. Also that going through the SC means that it won't be done militarily with a flurry of mass arrests and tribunals, but instead through the current civil court system.
I think devolution based on illegitimate elections precludes the legitimacy of this session of congress, and of their presidential election, and therefore any need for SCOTUS to be involved. And if we're going to prosecute the indictments of 300K+ assorted traitors, pedos, criminals and spies, dragging things through SCOTUS first, just doesn't seem a practical way to get it done. It also does nothing about the Fed, or the gradual choking of our freedoms through unconstitutional regulations by states and congress.
There is a possibility that this stuff can happen just for show, window dressing for the masses, with the tribunals having been already done secretly while we've been talking on GA. I hate that idea, but it's possible despite my feelings. Q did tell us "the choice to know will be yours," after all. That could mean a real solution in the background with an easy & fake solution for the masses. But I think we'll need to see tribunals broadcast and proof of treason presented to the public, to avoid civil war.
(I'm on the other extreme, thinking that we'll restore the Old Republic before the corporation, roll all federal laws back to 1870, and have martial law while a new election is set up to elect president #19, with the military ensuring fair state elections, governing the then-unadmitted states as territories until then. But I don't have proof of that, either, plus it sounds too good to be true.)
TLDR. It's good analysis of Trump's style, and logical speculation based premises that I disagree with. And a fun read!